Immature Granulocyte [IG] Count and Percentage for Medical Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis
[IG]
Are the Changes in Immature Granulocyte Count and Percentage Significant in the Decision to Continue Medical Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis Cases
1 other identifier
observational
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
After appendectomy was first described by Mcburney in 1889, it has been the most practiced emergency surgery in the world with the lifetime incidence of acute appendicitis being 5%-25%. Most cases are uncomplicated cases without any complications and perforation (20%-30%). Although appendectomy is still a curative therapy, medical treatment has come to the fore in uncomplicated cases after improvements in imaging methods for diagnosing acute appendicitis and especially the developments in antibiotherapy. Medical treatment for acute appendicitis is, in fact, not a new condition. Practicing the option of elective surgery following intravenous antibiotherapy for plastron appendicitis that is among the complicated acute appendicitis has lead to further consideration of medical treatment. A number of studies conducted for this purpose suggest that conservative treatment in uncomplicated acute appendicitis may be a first-line treatment. Medical treatment of the uncomplicated acute appendicitis prevents negative appendectomies, which indicates that surgical removal of non-inflamed appendix ranging from 6% to 20%. In addition to preventing unnecessary organ loss, it ensures eliminating postoperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and wound site complications due to surgery. Immature granulocytes (IG) are monitored in peripheral blood as immature polymorphonuclear cells because of the activation of bone marrow. Although their counts can be determined through direct inspection, they can be provided with automated systems within complete blood count parameters as well as technological developments. The increase in their number specifically suggests the activation of the bone marrow and can provide information about the infectious process before leukocytosis is observed. This study aimed to determine the importance of IG count and percentage to evaluate the role of medical treatment and control its success in cases of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedOctober 17, 2023
October 1, 2023
1 year
June 27, 2020
October 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Medical treatment success
Defining medical treatment success with immature granulocyte count (/mm3) comparing with appendectomy group's samples
Started with administration to the clinic and finished with the 24th hour of the follow up
Medical treatment success
Defining medical treatment success with immature granulocyte percentage (immature granulocyte count/total white blood cell count x100) comparing with appendectomy group's samples
Started with administration to the clinic and finished with the 24th hour of the follow up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Medical treatment continue
Started with administration to the clinic and finished with the 24th hour of the follow up
Medical treatment continue
Started with administration to the clinic and finished with the 24th hour of the follow up
Medical treatment continue
ALVARADO Score in the first administration to the clinic and the 24th hour of the follow up
Study Arms (2)
Medical Treatment Group
Medical treatment group of uncomplicated acute appendisitis
Surgery
Operated group of uncomplicated acute appendisitis
Interventions
medical tratment group
medical tratment group
appendectomy (open or laparascopic)
Eligibility Criteria
Uncomplicated acute appendicitis cases
You may qualify if:
- Clinically diagnosed uncomplicated acute appendisitis cases Uncomplicated acute appendicitis cases who accepted the study protocol Successfully medical treated acute appendicitis Operated uncomplicated acute appendicitis cases -
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically diagnosed complicated acute appendisitis cases Uncomplicated acute appendicitis cases who do not accept the study protocol Patients with any type of malignancy (appendix or other organ) Patients with rheumatologic disease or blood diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University
Kahramanmaraş, 46000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (12)
Kirkil C, Yigit MV, Aygen E. Long-term results of nonoperative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug;25(4):393-7. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2014.7192.
PMID: 25254521BACKGROUNDOkus A, Ay S, Karahan O, Eryilmaz MA, Sevinc B, Aksoy N. Monitoring C-reactive protein levels during medical management of acute appendicitis to predict the need for surgery. Surg Today. 2015 Apr;45(4):451-6. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1099-6. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
PMID: 25542081BACKGROUNDUnal Y. A new and early marker in the diagnosis of acute complicated appendicitis: immature granulocytes. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Sep;24(5):434-439. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2018.91661.
PMID: 30394497BACKGROUNDSalminen P, Tuominen R, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordstrom P, Aarnio M, Rantanen T, Hurme S, Mecklin JP, Sand J, Virtanen J, Jartti A, Gronroos JM. Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1259-1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13201.
PMID: 30264120BACKGROUNDBecker P, Fichtner-Feigl S, Schilling D. Clinical Management of Appendicitis. Visc Med. 2018 Dec;34(6):453-458. doi: 10.1159/000494883. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
PMID: 30675493BACKGROUNDWojciechowicz KH, Hoffkamp HJ, van Hulst RA. Conservative treatment of acute appendicitis: an overview. Int Marit Health. 2010;62(4):265-72.
PMID: 21348022BACKGROUNDCoccolini F, Fugazzola P, Sartelli M, Cicuttin E, Sibilla MG, Leandro G, De' Angelis GL, Gaiani F, Di Mario F, Tomasoni M, Catena F, Ansaloni L. Conservative treatment of acute appendicitis. Acta Biomed. 2018 Dec 17;89(9-S):119-134. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i9-S.7905.
PMID: 30561405BACKGROUNDKaron BS, Tolan NV, Wockenfus AM, Block DR, Baumann NA, Bryant SC, Clements CM. Evaluation of lactate, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, procalcitonin and immature granulocyte count as biomarkers for sepsis in emergency department patients. Clin Biochem. 2017 Nov;50(16-17):956-958. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 25.
PMID: 28552399BACKGROUNDNahm CH, Choi JW, Lee J. Delta neutrophil index in automated immature granulocyte counts for assessing disease severity of patients with sepsis. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2008 Summer;38(3):241-6.
PMID: 18715852BACKGROUNDUnal Y, Barlas AM. Role of increased immature granulocyte percentage in the early prediction of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019 Mar;25(2):177-182. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.70679.
PMID: 30892679BACKGROUNDPark JS, Kim JS, Kim YJ, Kim WY. Utility of the immature granulocyte percentage for diagnosing acute appendicitis among clinically suspected appendicitis in adult. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Sep;32(7):e22458. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22458. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
PMID: 29708633BACKGROUNDKirkil C, Karabulut K, Aygen E, Ilhan YS, Yur M, Binnetoglu K, Bulbuller N. Appendicitis scores may be useful in reducing the costs of treatment for right lower quadrant pain. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Jan;19(1):13-9. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.88714.
PMID: 23588973BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2020
First Posted
July 8, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share