Proton Versus Photon Therapy in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
SWANCA
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Dosimetric studies suggest that radiotherapy with protons has a potential to reduce side effects compared to treatment with photons for patients with anal carcinoma (AC). There are so far no studies comparing these treatment techniques in a randomised setting. The aim of this study is to compare side effects following photon therapy versus proton therapy within the framework of a randomised controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 7, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 28, 2031
ExpectedApril 3, 2025
March 1, 2025
5 years
June 24, 2020
March 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Acute grade >2 hematological side effects
Acute hematological side effects will be assessed by weekly full blood cell counts during radiotherapy and the first three weeks after treatment completion. Side Grade \>2 acute GI and haematological side-effects during therapy and up to three weeks after the end of treatment. Thereafter, every six weeks for up to three months after treatment. Results will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NTCAE) v5.0 scoring system. Haematological adverse events will also be assessed by registering febrile episodes during an after treatment as well as the frequency of chemotherapy dose reduction or delayed chemotherapy.
Treatment start until three months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Acute grade >2 gastrointestinal side effects
Treatment start until three months after treatment
Acute side effects from skin
Treatment start until three months after treatment
Acute side effects from the genitourinary tract
Treatment start until three months after treatment
Pain due to acute radiation reaction
Treatment start until three months after treatment
Late side effects from the gastro-intestinal system
From three months after treatment up to five years after treatment
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Cost-utility analysis
From randomisation until 5 years or death
Study Arms (2)
Photon radiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional photon radiation is delivered by volumetric arc therapy/intensity modulated radiotherapy/helical tomotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. The total dose to the primary tumour target and node metastases \>2 cm is 57.5 Gy in 27 fractions, one fraction/day, five fractions/week during 5.5 weeks. Node metastases up to 2 cm will receive 50.5 Gy in 27 fractions. Elective lymph nodes will receive a total dose of 41.6 Gy.
Proton radiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALProton radiation is delivered by spot scanning. Proton plans will be produced by single field optimisation/single field uniform dose or multifield optimisation/intensity modulated proton therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. The total dose to the primary tumour target and node metastases \>2 cm is 57.5 Gy(RBE) in 27 fractions, one fraction/day, five fractions/week during 5.5 weeks. Node metastases up to 2 cm will receive 50.5 Gy(RBE) in 27 fractions. Elective lymph nodes will receive a total dose of 41.6 Gy(RBE).
Interventions
Proton radiotherapy
Conventional photon radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient must be at least 18 years old
- Histologically confirmed, previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma (p16-positive or p16-negative) of the anal canal (ICD-O-3 C21), i.e. cancer of the perianal skin without connection to the anal canal are not included. The patients may have primary tumour, regional nodes, metastasis (TNM)-stage T2 (\>4 cm) -4,N0-1c,M0 (UICC 8th edition).
- World Health Organisation/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (WHO/ECOG) performance status 0-1
- The patient must be able to understand the information about the treatment and give a written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with cancer of the perianal skin without involvement of the anal canal (ICD-O-3 C44.5) are not eligible.
- Patient judged to have any other treatment than radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy as the preferred treatment
- Concomitant or previous malignancies. Exceptions are, adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or, other previous malignancy with a disease-free interval of at least 5 years.
- Two or more synchronous primary cancers in the pelvic region at time of diagnosis
- Previous radiotherapy, surgery or chemotherapy that may interfere with the planned treatment for the present disease, as judged by the investigator.
- Co-existing disease prejudicing survival (expected survival should be \>2 years).
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- When prosthetic materials (e.g. hip prostheses) are present close to the target volume it must be considered if this may introduce uncertainties in dose calculations that precludes especially, proton therapy.
- Patients with pacemaker/ICD are not eligible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Umeå Universitylead
- Region Västerbottencollaborator
- Uppsala County Council, Swedencollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, Sweden
Lund University Hospital
Lund, Sweden
Umeå University Hospital
Umeå, Sweden
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nina Cavalli Björkman, MD
Uppsala University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2020
First Posted
July 8, 2020
Study Start
April 7, 2021
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 28, 2031
Last Updated
April 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data may be made available upon request from other researchers to the study group