Tooth Whitening Evaluation With Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effect of Commercial Whitening Toothpastes on Oral Mucosal Cells
2 other identifiers
interventional
210
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bleaching discolored vital teeth is one of the most popular aesthetic treatment in dentistry in the last decade. Teeth whitening can be performed by professionals/dentists in the dental office ("in-office") and by the patients themselves at home (over-the-counter). A generally available method for teeth whitening is to use toothpastes which contain whitening ingredients. This method presents commercial option to remove discolorations on the enamel surface of vital teeth. There are many commercially available dentifrices that contain whitening agents, such as abrasives, chemical or optical agents. It has been noticed that whitening agents added in toothpastes can provide whitening effect visible to human eye that can objectively be evaluated by using sprectrophotometers. The results of teeth whitening can also be obtained subjectively by observation and comparison to tooth shade guide. Also, these products must be used with caution as they may cause some negative effects, such as dentinal hypersensitivity, irritations, peeling/exfoliation, dry mouth, rougher teeth and cytotoxic and genotoxic effect on oral mucosa cells. Studies that have already been conducted with whitening agents are based on abrasives, peroxides, optical agents and activated charcoal. The main objective in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of different brands of toothpastes with whitening effect and their performance (effect) on oral mucosa cells. As a measure of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in cells, the number of micronuclei and other morphological changes of the nucleus are determined (micronucleus assay). Other specific objectives are to investigate the patient satisfaction with the characteristic of treatment such as final tooth color, color stability, length of treatment, comfort during treatment and overall participant satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedJuly 8, 2020
July 1, 2020
1.6 years
June 27, 2020
July 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Color assessment before the treatment (T0)
The following measurements were will be recorded: L\*,a\*, b\* values for all teeth as well as the tooth shade. The color was will be established by CIELAB color space. ΔE is will be calculated using the following formula: ΔE=√(〖(ΔL\*)〗\^2+〖(Δa\*)〗\^2+〖(Δb\*)〗\^2 ). The color changes between the evaluation times in each tested group and between groups were will be analysed using the ΔE, ΔL\*, Δa\* and Δb\*values. To calculate the difference in tooth shade according to the Vita Classical scale, the recorded values were will be ordered in scores from 1 to 16 in a luminosity sequence.
0 days
Color change after 30 days of treatment (T1)
The following measurements were will be recorded: L\*,a\*, b\* values for all teeth as well as the tooth shade. The color was will be established by CIELAB color space. ΔE is will be calculated using the following formula: ΔE=√(〖(ΔL\*)〗\^2+〖(Δa\*)〗\^2+〖(Δb\*)〗\^2 ). The color changes between the evaluation times in each tested group and between groups were will be analysed using the ΔE, ΔL\*, Δa\* and Δb\*values. To calculate the difference in tooth shade according to the Vita Classical scale, the recorded values were will be ordered in scores from 1 to 16 in a luminosity sequence.
30 days
Color change after 60 days of treatment (T2)
The following measurements were will be recorded: L\*,a\*, b\* values for all teeth as well as the tooth shade. The color was will be established by CIELAB color space. ΔE is will be calculated using the following formula: ΔE=√(〖(ΔL\*)〗\^2+〖(Δa\*)〗\^2+〖(Δb\*)〗\^2 ). The color changes between the evaluation times in each tested group and between groups were will be analysed using the ΔE, ΔL\*, Δa\* and Δb\*values. To calculate the difference in tooth shade according to the Vita Classical scale, the recorded values were will be ordered in scores from 1 to 16 in a luminosity sequence.
60 days
Color change 30 days after the treatment (90 days from the beginning of treatment) (T3)
The following measurements were will be recorded: L\*,a\*, b\* values for all teeth as well as the tooth shade. The color was will be established by CIELAB color space. ΔE is will be calculated using the following formula: ΔE=√(〖(ΔL\*)〗\^2+〖(Δa\*)〗\^2+〖(Δb\*)〗\^2 ). The color changes between the evaluation times in each tested group and between groups were will be analysed using the ΔE, ΔL\*, Δa\* and Δb\*values. To calculate the difference in tooth shade according to the Vita Classical scale, the recorded values were will be ordered in scores from 1 to 16 in a luminosity sequence.
90 days
Assessment of biocompatibility before the treatment (T0)
Assessment of biocompatibility through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity parameters of commercially available toothpastes with whitening effect will be performed using micronucleus assay.
0 days
Assessment of biocompatibility after 30 days of treatment (T1)
Assessment of biocompatibility through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity parameters of commercially available toothpastes with whitening effect will be performed using micronucleus assay.
30 days
Assessment of biocompatibility after 60 days of treatment (T2)
Assessment of biocompatibility through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity parameters of commercially available toothpastes with whitening effect will be performed using micronucleus assay.
60 days
Assessment of biocompatibility 30 days after the treatment (90 days from the beginning of treatment) (T3)
Assessment of biocompatibility through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity parameters of commercially available toothpastes with whitening effect will be performed using micronucleus assay.
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of participant's satisfaction with treatment and used toothpaste after 60 days of treatment
60 days
Assessment of participant's satisfaction with treatment of used toothpaste 30 days after the treatment (90 days from the beginning of treatment)
90 days
Study Arms (6)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORA group of participants that will be using toothpaste without tooth whitening ingredients.
Whitening toothpaste 1
EXPERIMENTALA group of participants that will be using urea peroxide whitening toothpastes.
Whitening toothpaste 2
EXPERIMENTALA group of participants that will be using hydrogen peroxide whitening toothpastes.
Whitening toothpaste 3
EXPERIMENTALA group of participants that will be using whitening toothpastes that contain abrasive ingredients.
Whitening toothpaste 4
EXPERIMENTALA group of participants that will be using whitening toothpastes that contain enzymes as whitening ingredients.
Whitening toothpaste 5
EXPERIMENTALA group of participants that will be using toothpastes that contain an activated charcoal.
Interventions
A sample of cells from the buccal mucosa area will be taken with cytological sampling brush and will be fixed on on a microscopy slide and stained with a Feulgen fast green solution. The samples will be analyzed by electron microscopy. Tooth color will be measured, verified and evaluated with a Vita Easyshade V digital spectrophotometer in initial phase, after one month of usage, after two months of usage and one month after the end of usage. Before using any of the whitening toothpaste under test, every participant will use non whitening toothpaste for one month, twice a day. Satisfaction and impression with treatment will be recorded with the questionnaires provided for this study.
A sample of cells from the buccal mucosa area will be taken with cytological sampling brush and will be fixed on on a microscopy slide and stained with a Feulgen fast green solution. The samples will be analyzed by electron microscopy. Tooth color will be measured, verified and evaluated with a Vita Easyshade V digital spectrophotometer in initial phase, after one month of usage, after two months of usage and one month after the end of usage. Before using any of the whitening toothpaste under test, every participant will use non whitening toothpaste for one month, twice a day. Satisfaction and impression with treatment will be recorded with the questionnaires provided for this study.
A sample of cells from the buccal mucosa area will be taken with cytological sampling brush and will be fixed on on a microscopy slide and stained with a Feulgen fast green solution. The samples will be analyzed by electron microscopy. Tooth color will be measured, verified and evaluated with a Vita Easyshade V digital spectrophotometer in initial phase, after one month of usage, after two months of usage and one month after the end of usage. Before using any of the whitening toothpaste under test, every participant will use non whitening toothpaste for one month, twice a day. Satisfaction and impression with treatment will be recorded with the questionnaires provided for this study.
A sample of cells from the buccal mucosa area will be taken with cytological sampling brush and will be fixed on on a microscopy slide and stained with a Feulgen fast green solution. The samples will be analyzed by electron microscopy. Tooth color will be measured, verified and evaluated with a Vita Easyshade V digital spectrophotometer in initial phase, after one month of usage, after two months of usage and one month after the end of usage. Before using any of the whitening toothpaste under test, every participant will use non whitening toothpaste for one month, twice a day. Satisfaction and impression with treatment will be recorded with the questionnaires provided for this study.
A sample of cells from the buccal mucosa area will be taken with cytological sampling brush and will be fixed on on a microscopy slide and stained with a Feulgen fast green solution. The samples will be analyzed by electron microscopy. Tooth color will be measured, verified and evaluated with a Vita Easyshade V digital spectrophotometer in initial phase, after one month of usage, after two months of usage and one month after the end of usage. Before using any of the whitening toothpaste under test, every participant will use non whitening toothpaste for one month, twice a day. Satisfaction and impression with treatment will be recorded with the questionnaires provided for this study.
A sample of cells from the buccal mucosa area will be taken with cytological sampling brush and will be fixed on on a microscopy slide and stained with a Feulgen fast green solution. The samples will be analyzed by electron microscopy. Tooth color will be measured, verified and evaluated with a Vita Easyshade V digital spectrophotometer in initial phase, after one month of usage, after two months of usage and one month after the end of usage. Before using any of the whitening toothpaste under test, every participant will use non whitening toothpaste for one month, twice a day. Satisfaction and impression with treatment will be recorded with the questionnaires provided for this study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age of 18 and older
- non smokers
- good oral and general health
- excellent oral hygiene
- vital six anterior maxillary teeth free of caries or restorations
- tooth shade A2 or darker
- no cervical lesions or prosthodontic treatments
- no periodontal disease
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant women
- breastfeeding women
- individuals with discolored teeth (tetracycline stain, fluorosis)
- tooth sensitivity
- history of allergy to any dental hygiene product
- individuals who had previously undergone any tooth whitening treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of the Medicine, University of Split
Split, 21000, Croatia
Related Publications (36)
Joiner A. Whitening toothpastes: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 May 24.
PMID: 20562012BACKGROUNDEpple M, Meyer F, Enax J. A Critical Review of Modern Concepts for Teeth Whitening. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Aug 1;7(3):79. doi: 10.3390/dj7030079.
PMID: 31374877BACKGROUNDvan Loveren C, Duckworth RM. Anti-calculus and whitening toothpastes. Monogr Oral Sci. 2013;23:61-74. doi: 10.1159/000350698. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
PMID: 23817060BACKGROUNDLippert F. An introduction to toothpaste - its purpose, history and ingredients. Monogr Oral Sci. 2013;23:1-14. doi: 10.1159/000350456. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
PMID: 23817056BACKGROUNDPickles MJ, Evans M, Philpotts CJ, Joiner A, Lynch RJ, Noel N, Laucello M. In vitro efficacy of a whitening toothpaste containing calcium carbonate and perlite. Int Dent J. 2005;55(3 Suppl 1):197-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2005.tb00060.x.
PMID: 16004254BACKGROUNDCollins LZ, Naeeni M, Schafer F, Brignoli C, Schiavi A, Roberts J, Colgan P. The effect of a calcium carbonate/perlite toothpaste on the removal of extrinsic tooth stain in two weeks. Int Dent J. 2005;55(3 Suppl 1):179-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2005.tb00056.x.
PMID: 16004250BACKGROUNDKalliath C, Mukunda A, Pynadath M, Venugopal V, Prethweeraj J. Comparison between the effect of commercially available chemical teeth whitening paste and teeth whitening paste containing ingredients of herbal origin on human enamel. Ayu. 2018 Apr-Jun;39(2):113-117. doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_82_18.
PMID: 30783367BACKGROUNDPatil PA, Ankola AV, Hebbal MI, Patil AC. Comparison of effectiveness of abrasive and enzymatic action of whitening toothpastes in removal of extrinsic stains - a clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 Feb;13(1):25-9. doi: 10.1111/idh.12090. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
PMID: 25046241BACKGROUNDKalyana P, Shashidhar A, Meghashyam B, Sreevidya KR, Sweta S. Stain removal efficacy of a novel dentifrice containing papain and Bromelain extracts--an in vitro study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2011 Aug;9(3):229-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00473.x. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
PMID: 21356017BACKGROUNDHara AT, Turssi CP. Baking soda as an abrasive in toothpastes: Mechanism of action and safety and effectiveness considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Nov;148(11S):S27-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.09.007.
PMID: 29056187BACKGROUNDGhassemi A, Hooper W, Vorwerk L, Domke T, DeSciscio P, Nathoo S. Effectiveness of a new dentifrice with baking soda and peroxide in removing extrinsic stain and whitening teeth. J Clin Dent. 2012;23(3):86-91.
PMID: 23210419BACKGROUNDVaz VTP, Jubilato DP, Oliveira MRM, Bortolatto JF, Floros MC, Dantas AAR, Oliveira Junior OB. Whitening toothpaste containing activated charcoal, blue covarine, hydrogen peroxide or microbeads: which one is the most effective? J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Jan 14;27:e20180051. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0051.
PMID: 30673027BACKGROUNDFranco MC, Uehara J, Meroni BM, Zuttion GS, Cenci MS. The Effect of a Charcoal-based Powder for Enamel Dental Bleaching. Oper Dent. 2020 Nov 1;45(6):618-623. doi: 10.2341/19-122-L.
PMID: 32243248BACKGROUNDJoiner A, Luo W. Tooth colour and whiteness: A review. J Dent. 2017 Dec;67S:S3-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
PMID: 28928097BACKGROUNDKorifi R, Le Dreau Y, Antinelli JF, Valls R, Dupuy N. CIEL*a*b* color space predictive models for colorimetry devices--analysis of perfume quality. Talanta. 2013 Jan 30;104:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
PMID: 23597889BACKGROUNDMartin J, Rivas V, Vildosola P, Moncada L, Oliveira Junior OB, Saad JR, Fernandez E, Moncada G. Personality Style in Patients Looking for Tooth Bleaching and Its Correlation with Treatment Satisfaction. Braz Dent J. 2016 Jan-Feb;27(1):60-5. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600127.
PMID: 27007348BACKGROUNDParavina RD, Perez MM, Ghinea R. Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: A comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Mar;31(2):103-112. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12465. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
PMID: 30891913BACKGROUNDParameswaran V, Anilkumar S, Lylajam S, Rajesh C, Narayan V. Comparison of accuracies of an intraoral spectrophotometer and conventional visual method for shade matching using two shade guide systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Oct-Dec;16(4):352-358. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.176537.
PMID: 27746599BACKGROUNDParavina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Dental color standards: shade tab arrangement. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13(4):254-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00271.x.
PMID: 11572509BACKGROUNDChu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e2-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
PMID: 20621154BACKGROUNDPaul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res. 2002 Aug;81(8):578-82. doi: 10.1177/154405910208100815.
PMID: 12147751BACKGROUNDCamargo SE, Joias RP, Santana-Melo GF, Ferreira LT, El Achkar VN, Rode Sde M. Conventional and whitening toothpastes: cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and effect on the enamel surface. Am J Dent. 2014 Dec;27(6):307-11.
PMID: 25707084BACKGROUNDHolland N, Bolognesi C, Kirsch-Volders M, Bonassi S, Zeiger E, Knasmueller S, Fenech M. The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for biomonitoring DNA damage: the HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps. Mutat Res. 2008 Jul-Aug;659(1-2):93-108. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
PMID: 18514568BACKGROUNDThomas P, Fenech M. Buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;682:235-48. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-409-8_17.
PMID: 21057932BACKGROUNDTorres-Bugarin O, Zavala-Cerna MG, Nava A, Flores-Garcia A, Ramos-Ibarra ML. Potential uses, limitations, and basic procedures of micronuclei and nuclear abnormalities in buccal cells. Dis Markers. 2014;2014:956835. doi: 10.1155/2014/956835. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PMID: 24778463BACKGROUNDBolognesi C, Knasmueller S, Nersesyan A, Thomas P, Fenech M. The HUMNxl scoring criteria for different cell types and nuclear anomalies in the buccal micronucleus cytome assay - an update and expanded photogallery. Mutat Res. 2013 Oct-Dec;753(2):100-113. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
PMID: 23942275BACKGROUNDTolbert PE, Shy CM, Allen JW. Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development. Mutat Res. 1992 Feb;271(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(92)90033-i.
PMID: 1371831BACKGROUNDTadin A, Gavic L, Zeravica A, Ugrin K, Galic N, Zeljezic D. Assessment of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of conventional and whitening kinds of toothpaste on oral mucosa cells. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Jan;76(1):64-70. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1384567. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
PMID: 28959909BACKGROUNDTadin A, Gavic L, Govic T, Galic N, Zorica Vladislavic N, Zeljezic D. In vivo evaluation of fluoride and sodium lauryl sulphate in toothpaste on buccal epithelial cells toxicity. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Jul;77(5):386-393. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1577988. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
PMID: 30784350BACKGROUNDTadin A, Galic N, Mladinic M, Marovic D, Kovacic I, Zeljezic D. Genotoxicity in gingival cells of patients undergoing tooth restoration with two different dental composite materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Jan;18(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0933-3. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
PMID: 23385426BACKGROUNDAkarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E. Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Apr-Jun;20(2):195-200. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.52902.
PMID: 19553722BACKGROUNDSabherwal RS, Gonzalez J, Naini FB. Assessing the influence of skin color and tooth shade value on perceived smile attractiveness. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Jun;140(6):696-705. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0256.
PMID: 19491166BACKGROUNDKershaw S, Newton JT, Williams DM. The influence of tooth colour on the perceptions of personal characteristics among female dental patients: comparisons of unmodified, decayed and 'whitened' teeth. Br Dent J. 2008 Mar 8;204(5):E9; discussion 256-7. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.134. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
PMID: 18297050BACKGROUNDAngel P, Bersezio C, Estay J, Werner A, Retamal H, Araya C, Martin J, Fernandez E. Color stability, psychosocial impact, and effect on self-perception of esthetics of tooth whitening using low-concentration (6%) hydrogen peroxide. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(7):557-566. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a40468.
PMID: 29786702BACKGROUNDVladislavic NZ, Vladislavic J, Franic I, Tadin A. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of whitening toothpastes in buccal mucosal cells: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):6245-6259. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05241-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
PMID: 37704916DERIVEDVladislavic NZ, Tadin A, Gavic L, Jerkovic D, Franic I, Verzak Z. In vivo evaluation of whitening toothpaste efficiency and patient treatment satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):739-750. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04052-x. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
PMID: 34245356DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Tooth Whitening Evaluation With Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effect of Commercial Whitening Toothpastes on Oral Mucosal Cells
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2020
First Posted
July 8, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 31, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
July 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07