A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of RESP301 Plus Standard of Care (SOC) Compared to SOC Alone in Hospitalized Participants With COVID-19
An Open-label, Adaptive Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RESP301 Plus Standard of Care (SOC) Compared to SOC Alone in Hospitalized Participants With COVID-19 WHO Grade 3&4 (NOCoV2)
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The effect of RESP301 as an add on treatment to SOC will be evaluated for its efficacy in reducing rate of progression to a more severe level of COVID-19 and for safety, by comparison with SOC alone in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 covid19
Started Jul 2020
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 29, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 21, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 2, 2022
CompletedJune 2, 2022
April 1, 2022
9 months
July 3, 2020
April 7, 2022
June 1, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale
A modified WHO ordinal scale was used for consistency with the recent study in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, to record the participant's status at the time of assessment. The modified WHO ordinal scale included the following levels : 1= Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2= Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 3= Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4= Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 6= Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 7= Death. Higher scores mean worse outcome. The number of participants that had an increase in at least one level higher score on the modified WHO ordinal scale was assessed.
Baseline, Day 2 and Day 3
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over Time
Day 1 (Baseline) Post-Nebulization, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over Time
Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each Visit
Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
Time to Improvement of at Least One Level Lower on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale
From Baseline to Day 28
Time to Progression of at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale
From Baseline to Day 28
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Investigational arm
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive inhaled RESP301 administered using a nebulizer three times a day for up to 10 days in addition to the standard of care.
Control arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive institutional SOC for the treatment of COVID-19
Interventions
Product application requires inhalation using a standard handheld nebulizer.
Participants will receive institutional SOC for the treatment of COVID-19.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant has laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection as determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or other approved clinical testing prior to randomization.
- Participant is hospitalized in relation to COVID-19, requiring supplemental oxygen to maintain SpO2 at a safe level (WHO level 3 \& 4).
- Participant is capable of giving signed informed consent
- Participant is male or female. All females of childbearing potential, including pregnant females, must consent to urine pregnancy testing at screening to be eligible for the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Rapidly deteriorating or likely to require escalation to high flow oxygen, invasive or non-invasive ventilatory support within 24 hours according to Investigator's opinion.
- Unable to safely receive a nebulized treatment for approximately 8 minutes according to Investigator's opinion.
- Unable to receive or considered ineligible for invasive or non-invasive ventilatory support.
- History of methemoglobinemia.
- Presence of uncontrolled asthma, history of severe bronchospasm.
- Presence of severe chronic respiratory disease and tracheostomy.
- Suspected or confirmed untreated, active tuberculosis.
- Severely immune-compromised participants in Investigator's opinion.
- Recent active coronary artery disease or decompensated heart failure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital
London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
Royal Preston Hospital
Preston, PR2 9HT, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Alison Bracchi, MSc
- Organization
- Thirty Respiratory Ltd
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2020
First Posted
July 7, 2020
Study Start
July 29, 2020
Primary Completion
April 24, 2021
Study Completion
May 21, 2021
Last Updated
June 2, 2022
Results First Posted
June 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04