Covid-19 Breath Test
Breath Test Feasibility Trial for Covid-19 Infection Diagnosis
1 other identifier
interventional
330
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Can Nanotechnology Biomarker Tagging (NBT) be used to detect COVID-19 infection in people presenting for COVID-19 testing? NBT can be used to detect the substances present in a person's breath. In this study the breath of people presenting for COVID-19 testing is going to be analysed. Analysing a large number of samples from people with COVID-19 (as confirmed by the standard swab test used by the NHS) will enable a breath profile to be produced, ie the substances present in the breath when someone has COVID-19. After the profile has been validated, NBT can be used to test whether or not a person has COVID-19 by seeing if their breath matches the profile. Using this technology for COVID-19 testing has advantages over the current standard test. The sample can be analysed immediately in the clinical setting and the results are available in 5-10 minutes, so if the person tests negative they can go back to their normal life straight away. The current swab test takes around 72 hours for the results to be available, and the person needs to self-isolate during this time in case they test positive, resulting in potentially unnecessary days of work missed and inconvenience. The breath test is non-invasive and is unlikely to cause any discomfort, as the person is only required to breath normally into the device. This study will also review the practicalities of using this test. It is quick and easy to train people in how to carry out the test, so it could potentially easily be rolled out to testing sites.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 7, 2021
CompletedJanuary 29, 2021
July 1, 2020
6 months
July 3, 2020
January 28, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To investigate/ examine the effectiveness of Nanotechnology Biomarker Tagging (NBT) in detecting COVID-19 infection using breath samples of patients with COVID-19 symptoms
This will be measured by identification of VOCs present in the breath sample of the COVID-19 positive and their relative concentrations compared to a COVID-19 negative breath sample. These will be combined to provide a COVID-19 positive profile
6 Months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
-To profile the unique pattern of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) found in the expired breath of COVID-19 patients using the NBT system (VOC analysis and ML).
6 months
To differentiate this unique profile from the patients that are found to be negative for COVID-19
6 months
Study Arms (1)
Study Arm
EXPERIMENTALBreath Test and Cheek Swab collection
Interventions
Breath Sample and Cheek Swab of participants will be used for machine learning (NBT - Nanobiotechnology Biomarkers Tagging) system to develop a profile which can be used later on for Covid-19 Diagnosis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male \& Females.
- Age Above 16 years old
- All Ethnicity
- Any patients that come for COVID-19 testing
- COVID Negative Patients (Further participants may be selected as control groups who have no current diagnosis of COVID-19.)
- COVID Positive In-Patients
You may not qualify if:
- Outside of stated age range - below 16
- Unable to consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 0PZ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (10)
Ajibola OA, Smith D, Spanel P, Ferns GA. Effects of dietary nutrients on volatile breath metabolites. J Nutr Sci. 2013 Oct 31;2:e34. doi: 10.1017/jns.2013.26. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 25191584BACKGROUNDSmith D, Spanel P. The challenge of breath analysis for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring. Analyst. 2007 May;132(5):390-6. doi: 10.1039/b700542n. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
PMID: 17471381BACKGROUNDAmann A, Spanel P, Smith D. Breath analysis: the approach towards clinical applications. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2007 Feb;7(2):115-29. doi: 10.2174/138955707779802606.
PMID: 17305586BACKGROUNDGouma PI, Wang L, Simon SR, Stanacevic M. Novel Isoprene Sensor for a Flu Virus Breath Monitor. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 20;17(1):199. doi: 10.3390/s17010199.
PMID: 28117692BACKGROUNDKim, K.-H.Kim., Jahan, S.A., Kabir, E., (2012) A review of breath analysis for diagnosis of human health. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. v.33, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2011.09.013
BACKGROUNDLake MA. What we know so far: COVID-19 current clinical knowledge and research. Clin Med (Lond). 2020 Mar;20(2):124-127. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-coron. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
PMID: 32139372BACKGROUNDMarczin N, Kharitonov S (2003) Lung Biology in Health and Disease. Disease Markers in Exhaled Breath Edited by: New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003.
BACKGROUNDNHS-England, (2020) Guidance and standard operating procedure COVID-19 virus testing in NHS laboratories.
BACKGROUNDSethi S, Nanda R, Chakraborty T. Clinical application of volatile organic compound analysis for detecting infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):462-75. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00020-13.
PMID: 23824368BACKGROUNDRisby T., (2005): Current status of clinical breath analysis. In Breath Analysis for Clinical Diagnosis and Therapeutic Monitoring Edited by: Amann A, Smith D. Singapore: World Scientific; 2005:251-265.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen Winchester, MBBS, MSc
Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2020
First Posted
July 7, 2020
Study Start
June 29, 2020
Primary Completion
January 7, 2021
Study Completion
January 7, 2021
Last Updated
January 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share