NCT04455789

Brief Summary

Previous studies showed that, best lung protective strategies of ventilation parameters are based on driving pressure in damaged lungs. But there are few studies concerning the effects of different positions during different types of surgery on driving pressure with normal lungs.So the investigators decided to compare mechanical ventilation based on driving pressure with conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with lateral decubitus position during total hip replacement surgery. The investigators hypothesised that, there will be better intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory parameters with better early postoperative results in patients whom mechanical ventilation parameters are adjusted according to driving pressure. In this randomised, controlled, double blind study, 60 patients who will have total hip replacement surgery will be recruited to the study. 30 patients will be ventilated by 8 ml/kg tidal volume and 5 cmH20 PEEP, in conventional lung protective group. And the other 30 patients will be ventilated by 8 ml/kg tidal volume and PEEP level with the lowest driving pressure. The investigators primary goal in this study study is to compare the effects of conventional lung protective ventilation with ventilation based on driving pressure on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. And secondly, the investigators aim to compare the effects of these two techniques s on early postoperative outcome. The investigators primary result parameters are intra operative fluid consumption, lactate, etC02 and mix venous oxygen saturation levels.The investigators secondary result parameters are postoperative mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and discharge times.

Trial Health

33
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Trial recruitment is currently suspended
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
suspended

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 25, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 2, 2020

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 25, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Driving Pressurelung protective ventilationPEEPtotal hip replacementlateral position

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • volume of intraoperative fluid administration

    the patients will receive intraoperative fluids according to a protocol based on PVI.

    during intraoperative period

  • intraoperative etCO2 levels

    et CO2 levels will be recorded form the anesthesia machine monitor

    during mechanical ventilation

  • lactate levels

    lactate levels will be obtained from the serial blood gas analysis

    during intraoperative period

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • postoperative mechanical ventilation duration

    From end of surgery to the end of mechanical ventilation duration in the intensive care unit until the patient is extubated, up to 3 days

  • postoperative intensive care stay

    From end of operation to the end of intensive care stay, up to 1 week

  • length of hospital stay after the operation

    form end of surgery to the end of hospital stay, up to 10 days

Study Arms (2)

conventional mechanical ventilation

EXPERIMENTAL

routine mechanical ventilation will be adjusted based on conventional mechanical ventilation settings with tidal volume of 8 ml/kg and PEEP level of 5

Procedure: routine lung protective, conventional mechanical ventilation

mechanical ventilation adjusted according to driving pressure

EXPERIMENTAL

routine mechanical ventilation adjusted based on driving pressure during lateral position. After patients are put to lateral position incremental increase in PEEP will be applied and the driving pressures will be recorded for each PEEP level and the patients will be ventilated with this PEEP during anesthesia. the other setting will be same with conventional group. tidal volume of 8 ml/kg

Procedure: routine lung protective, conventional mechanical ventilation

Interventions

routine lung protective, conventional mechanical ventilation with stabil PEEP

Also known as: routine lung protective, conventional mechanical ventilation with PEEP adjusted to the lowest Driving Pressure level
conventional mechanical ventilationmechanical ventilation adjusted according to driving pressure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients planned to have total hip replacement

You may not qualify if:

  • High intracranial pressure Bronchopleural fistula Hypovolemic shock Right ventricular failure Left ventricular failure(Ejection fraction lower than 50%) Arrythmia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Akdeniz University Hospital

Antalya, 07070, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hip FracturesOsteoarthritis, Hip

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesHip InjuriesLeg InjuriesOsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Zekiye Bigat, Prof

    Akdeniz University Medical School Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • İlker O Aycan, Ass Prof

    Akdeniz University Medical school Anesthesiology and Reanimation Departmnet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2020

First Posted

July 2, 2020

Study Start

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion

August 1, 2022

Study Completion

August 1, 2024

Last Updated

January 31, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations