Study Stopped
monitoring equipment used in the study is not available
Mechanical Ventilation Based on Driving Pressure in Lateral Position
Mechanical Ventilation in Lateral Position During Total Hip Replacement Surgery : Comparison of Driving Pressure With Conventional Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous studies showed that, best lung protective strategies of ventilation parameters are based on driving pressure in damaged lungs. But there are few studies concerning the effects of different positions during different types of surgery on driving pressure with normal lungs.So the investigators decided to compare mechanical ventilation based on driving pressure with conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with lateral decubitus position during total hip replacement surgery. The investigators hypothesised that, there will be better intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory parameters with better early postoperative results in patients whom mechanical ventilation parameters are adjusted according to driving pressure. In this randomised, controlled, double blind study, 60 patients who will have total hip replacement surgery will be recruited to the study. 30 patients will be ventilated by 8 ml/kg tidal volume and 5 cmH20 PEEP, in conventional lung protective group. And the other 30 patients will be ventilated by 8 ml/kg tidal volume and PEEP level with the lowest driving pressure. The investigators primary goal in this study study is to compare the effects of conventional lung protective ventilation with ventilation based on driving pressure on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. And secondly, the investigators aim to compare the effects of these two techniques s on early postoperative outcome. The investigators primary result parameters are intra operative fluid consumption, lactate, etC02 and mix venous oxygen saturation levels.The investigators secondary result parameters are postoperative mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and discharge times.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 31, 2024
January 1, 2024
3 years
June 25, 2020
January 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
volume of intraoperative fluid administration
the patients will receive intraoperative fluids according to a protocol based on PVI.
during intraoperative period
intraoperative etCO2 levels
et CO2 levels will be recorded form the anesthesia machine monitor
during mechanical ventilation
lactate levels
lactate levels will be obtained from the serial blood gas analysis
during intraoperative period
Secondary Outcomes (3)
postoperative mechanical ventilation duration
From end of surgery to the end of mechanical ventilation duration in the intensive care unit until the patient is extubated, up to 3 days
postoperative intensive care stay
From end of operation to the end of intensive care stay, up to 1 week
length of hospital stay after the operation
form end of surgery to the end of hospital stay, up to 10 days
Study Arms (2)
conventional mechanical ventilation
EXPERIMENTALroutine mechanical ventilation will be adjusted based on conventional mechanical ventilation settings with tidal volume of 8 ml/kg and PEEP level of 5
mechanical ventilation adjusted according to driving pressure
EXPERIMENTALroutine mechanical ventilation adjusted based on driving pressure during lateral position. After patients are put to lateral position incremental increase in PEEP will be applied and the driving pressures will be recorded for each PEEP level and the patients will be ventilated with this PEEP during anesthesia. the other setting will be same with conventional group. tidal volume of 8 ml/kg
Interventions
routine lung protective, conventional mechanical ventilation with stabil PEEP
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients planned to have total hip replacement
You may not qualify if:
- High intracranial pressure Bronchopleural fistula Hypovolemic shock Right ventricular failure Left ventricular failure(Ejection fraction lower than 50%) Arrythmia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akdeniz University Hospital
Antalya, 07070, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zekiye Bigat, Prof
Akdeniz University Medical School Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
İlker O Aycan, Ass Prof
Akdeniz University Medical school Anesthesiology and Reanimation Departmnet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2020
First Posted
July 2, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 1, 2022
Study Completion
August 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 31, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share