Study on the Development of Arthroscopic Treatment of Refractory Tennis Elbow

NCT04454060 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: M2018063
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 43
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the exploration history, key theories, methods, and techniques involved in the evolution from the intracapsular method to the extracapsular method for arthroscopic treatment of tennis elbow, and explore the effectiveness and safety of extracapsular method on the basis of retrospective analysis of 43 cases.

Conditions

Tennis Elbow

Keywords

Qualitative; Quantitative; Tennis Elbow; Arthroscopy; Surgical Techniques

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Mayo Elbow Performance Score

  Use Mayo Elbow Performance Score（MEPS） to evaluate the functional recovery of patients who received extracapsular arthroscopic treatment. MEPS ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome.

  12 months

• Visual Analog Scale

  Use Visual Analog Scale(VAS) to evaluate the pain recovery of patients who received extracapsular arthroscopic treatment. VAS ranges from 0 to 10, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  12 months

• Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score

  Use Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand(DASH) score to evaluate the functional and pain recovery of patients who received extracapsular arthroscopic treatment. DASH ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  12 months

• Activity of Daily Life recovery time

  Use Activity of Daily Life recovery time to evaluate the functional recovery of patients who received extracapsular arthroscopic treatment.

  12 months

Study Arms (1)

Extracapsular method group

consecutive 43 patients who received extracapsular method treatment for refractory tennis elbow

Procedure: Extracapsular arthroscopy

Interventions

Extracapsular arthroscopy PROCEDURE

Extracapsular arthroscopy method was used to treat refractory tennis elbow

Extracapsular method group

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

the quantitative data of 43 patients (14 men and 29 women) were reviewed. The minimum age was 35 years, and the maximum age was 55 years old, with an average of 44.4 years.

You may qualify if:

• Diagnosis was refractory tennis elbow;
• Standard extracapsular method was used for surgery.

You may not qualify if:

• Patient had past history of joint infection, joint tuberculosis, or osteomyelitis, or the upper limb had undergone surgery within the past 6 months;
• Diagnosis was combined with severe heart, brain, kidney, or another organ dysfunction;
• Case was complicated with other serious elbow joint diseases or injuries;
• Patient did not sign the informed consent form.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Peking University Third Hospital: lead

Study Sites (1)

Peking Univerisity Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tennis Elbow

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Elbow Tendinopathy; Tendinopathy; Muscular Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Elbow Injuries; Arm Injuries; Wounds and Injuries; Tendon Injuries

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 26, 2020
• First Posted: July 1, 2020
• Study Start: May 23, 2018
• Primary Completion: November 23, 2018
• Study Completion: May 2, 2019
• Last Updated: July 1, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

CN (1)