Study Stopped
lack of inclusion
Induced Motion Illusions Through Vision and Tendon Vibrations: Study of Interactions in Hemiplegic Subjects
OPTIVIBE
2 other identifiers
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Two movement illusion techniques can currently be used in clinical practice for motor rehabilitation after stroke hemiplegia: visual illusion (mirror therapy) and proprioceptive illusion (tendon vibration). Mirror therapy, in its computerized version (IVS3, Dessintey, Saint-Etienne, France), is based on the substitution of the deficient visual feedback by a visual feedback of a correctly realized movement. The proprioceptive illusion is based on the external application of a vibrator on muscle tendons at a frequency between 50 and 120 Hz. These two techniques are currently used independently. They are, in theory, complementary and additive. No study has described the combinatorial properties of the illusions generated by these 2 techniques in hemiplegic subjects and healthy subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 28, 2023
CompletedMay 30, 2023
May 1, 2023
2 years
June 22, 2020
May 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
subjective measure of the intensity of the perception of movements: change from baseline impression of movement at day 7
Measured impression of movement on conditions (visual and/or proprioceptive; yes/no/don't know)
Day: 0, 7
subjective measure of the intensity of the perception of movements: change from baseline nature of this impression at day 7
Measured nature of this impression of movement (flexion/extension)
Day: 0, 7
subjective measure of the intensity of the perception of movements: change from baseline intensity of the movement felt at day 7
Measured intensity of the movement felt by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) results (0 = no sense of movement and 10 = like real movement.)
Day: 0, 7
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Objective measurement of the perceived movement angle reproduced without motor intention by the hemiplegic subjects with the healthy limb
Day: 0, 7
Measurement of motor intention in hemiplegic subjects by experimental conditions
Day: 0, 7
To compare the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score according to the level of motor impairment
Day: 0
To compare the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score with the Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA) score
Day: 0
Intensity of the perception of movements using a visual analogue scale and the objective measurement of perceived movement angle reproduced by the healthy subjects with the vibrated arm
Day: 0, 7
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patient with first stroke causing hemiplegic
EXPERIMENTALPatient with first stroke causing hemiplegic will be included. They will have Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) associated at tendon vibration: * Visit 1: wrist flexion (right and left arms) with 5 randomized experimental conditions (vision+vibration, vision alone, vibration alone, static image+vibration, vision of extension+vibration(incongruence)) * Visit 2 (1 week later): wrist extension (right and left arms) with 5 randomized experimental conditions (vision+vibration, vision alone, vibration alone, static image+vibration, vision of flexion+vibration (incongruence)) These conditions will be recording by the Kinovea software, which allows the measurement of angles and amplitudes.
healthy subjects
SHAM COMPARATORHealthy subjects will be included. They will have Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) associated at tendon vibration: * Visit 1: wrist flexion (right and left arms) with 5 randomized experimental conditions (vision+vibration, vision alone, vibration alone, static image+vibration, vision of extension+vibration(incongruence)) * Visit 2 (1 week later): wrist extension (right and left arms) with 5 randomized experimental conditions (vision+vibration, vision alone, vibration alone, static image+vibration, vision of flexion+vibration (incongruence)) These conditions will be recording by the Kinovea software, which allows the measurement of angles and amplitudes.
Interventions
Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) will be realizing by the device Intensive Visual Simulation 3 (IVS3). The patient looks on a screen in front of him, mirroring the movements made by his hand, while attempting to perform the same movement with his other hand.
Transcutaneous vibrations are used. This device allows vibrations from 50 to 120 Hz with amplitude of 1 mm. This study the frequency used is 70 and 80 Hz.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hemiplegic subjects :
- Male or female
- Aged 18 to 70 years,
- First ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke causing hemiplegic
- Having signed the written consent
- Affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
- Healthy subjects :
- Male or female, aged 18 to 70 years,
- Matched in sex, age and laterally with hemiplegic subjects
- Having signed the written consent
- Affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
You may not qualify if:
- Hemiplegic subjects :
- With complete lesion of the primary motor cortex
- With an addiction to alcohol or drugs
- With psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment, uncontrolled disease/epilepsy, malignant illness severe kidney or lung disease
- With history of associated general disabling disease
- With cerebellar syndrome
- With clinical brain stem involvement
- Under legal protection
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Healthy subjects :
- Neurological, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal diseases
- Taking medication that can affect attention
- Unable to understand instructions of the study
- Under legal protection
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, France
Related Publications (1)
Adham A, Bessaguet H, Struber L, Rimaud D, Ojardias E, Giraux P. Distinct and additive effects of visual and vibratory feedback for motor rehabilitation: an EEG study in healthy subjects. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Sep 12;21(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01453-3.
PMID: 39267092DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pascal GIRAUX, PhD
CHU SAINT-ETIENNE
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2020
First Posted
June 26, 2020
Study Start
April 30, 2021
Primary Completion
April 25, 2023
Study Completion
April 28, 2023
Last Updated
May 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share