NCT04448210

Brief Summary

The overall aims of this project are to: 1) create a developmentally appropriate interactive educational website for adolescents called DigiKnowIt News: Teen, and 2) examine the feasibility of DigiKnowIt News: Teen in a small randomized control trial with adolescents.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 22, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 25, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 30, 2020

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 19, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 2, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 19, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

19 days

First QC Date

June 22, 2020

Results QC Date

September 28, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 23, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Knowledge Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will respond to 25 questions that assess their factual knowledge about clinical research (e.g., Who is part of a clinical trial?). Questions are in multiple choice format and some questions have multiple correct answers. The correct responses were summed across the questions. The range of scores is from 0 to 46. Higher scores indicate more knowledge about clinical research.

    1 week

  • Attitudes Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will be asked to respond to 6 questions that assess their positive attitudes about clinical trials (e.g., How do you feel about kids participating in clinical trials?; 1=Not good at all; 2=Not very good; 3=Not sure; 4=Good; 5=Very good). Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward clinical trials.

    1 week

  • Beliefs Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will be asked to respond to 5 questions that assess their beliefs about positive aspects of pediatric clinical research (e.g., I believe that clinical trials can help kids; 1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Unsure; 4=Agree; 5=Strongly Agree). Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more positive beliefs about clinical research.

    1 week

  • Self-Efficacy to Communicate Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will be asked to respond to 10 questions related to their self-efficacy for making decisions related to participation in clinical trials for communicating about clinical trials (e.g., Tell the researcher that I don't want to participate in the clinical trial, even if they really want me to do it; 1 = I cannot do it at all; 5 = I know I can do it.). Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy about communicating about clinical trials.

    1 week

  • Self-Efficacy to Gather Information Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will be asked to respond to 9 questions related to their self-efficacy for making decisions related to participation in clinical trials for gathering information about clinical trials (e.g., How sure are you that you can do the following things: Ask my parents questions for more information about clinical trials?; 1 = I cannot do it at all; 5 = I know I can do it.). Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy for gathering information about clinical trials.

    1 week

  • Confidence Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will be asked to respond to 3 questions to measure youths' confidence for participating clinical trials (e.g., I know what rights I have in a clinical trial. I know whom to ask if I need more information about a clinical trial.; 1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Unsure; 4=Agree; 5=Strongly Agree). Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more confidence for participating in clinical trials.

    1 week

  • Procedural Fears Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will be asked to respond to 4 questions related to their perceptions of fear or anxiety about different types of medical procedures, including getting a needle in the arm, injection in the leg, getting a scan, and taking new medicine, on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all afraid or anxious, 2 = Somewhat afraid or anxious, 3 = Moderately afraid or anxious, 4 = Very afraid or anxious, 5 = Extremely afraid or anxious). Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more fears about medical procedures.

    1 week

  • Likelihood of Participation Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will be asked to respond to one question about the likelihood of participating in a clinical trial (i.e., If you were asked to be in a clinical trial, how likely would you be to participate?) using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not likely; 5 = Extremely likely). The minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate increased likelihood of participating in a clinical trial.

    1 week

  • Fear Preventing Participation Scores at 1 Week

    Youth will be asked to respond to one question about the likelihood of their fear preventing them from participating in a clinical trial (i.e., How likely is it that your fearful or anxious feelings could stop you from participating in a clinical trial in the future?) using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not likely; 5 = Extremely likely). The minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate increased likelihood of fear preventing them from participating in a clinical trial.

    1 week

Study Arms (2)

Educational website intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention is an educational website designed to teach youth (12-17 years) about pediatric clinical trials.

Behavioral: DigiKnowIt News: Teen

Wait-list control

NO INTERVENTION

The wait-list control group did not receive the intervention between the pre-test and post-test assessments. After completing the post-test questionnaire, youth in the wait-list control group had the option to receive access to the intervention (DigiKnowIt News).

Interventions

Teens will interact with a multimedia educational website that will teach them about pediatric clinical trials including topics such as participant rights and safety, benefits and costs to participating in a study, and different types of procedures used in trials.

Educational website intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must be between the ages of 12 and 17 years.
  • Participants must have access to a computer or tablet with Internet connection.
  • Participants must be able to read and write in English fluently.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants must NOT have previously participated in a clinical trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

innovation Research & Training

Durham, North Carolina, 27713, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Chronic Conditions

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Alison Parker
Organization
innovation Research & Training

Study Officials

  • Alison Parker, PhD

    Innovation Research & Training

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2020

First Posted

June 25, 2020

Study Start

June 30, 2020

Primary Completion

July 19, 2020

Study Completion

August 2, 2020

Last Updated

December 19, 2020

Results First Posted

December 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations