Perioperative Fluid Therapy in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Penile Hypospadias Repair
Role of Lung Ultrasound in Comparison of Different Fluid Replacement Regimens in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Penile Hypospadias Repair, Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Optimization of perioperative fluid management is important for preventing adverse events, such as hypovolemia, cardiogenic shock, volume overload, and pulmonary edema, in both adult and pediatric patients. If the intravascular (IV) fluid volume is not optimized, pediatric patients are at risk of dehydration or volume overload. Perioperative IV fluid therapy is important during and after induction of general anesthesia (GA).The aim of this study is to investigate the difference between conventional and restrictive fluid replacement regimens using lung ultrasound in pediatric patients undergoing penile hypospadias repair, as a surgery with minor fluid loss.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2020
CompletedJune 8, 2021
June 1, 2021
6 months
June 20, 2020
June 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
volume overload using lung ultrasound
volume overload using lung ultrasound according to The mean number of B-lines detected on the ultrasound image
intraoperative duration that is approximately 110 minutes.
Study Arms (2)
conventional group, CG
EXPERIMENTALreceives Ringer's lactate solution at a rate of 4 ml/kg/h for the first-10 kg of body weight, 2 ml/kg/h for the second-10 kg of body weight, and 1 ml/kg/h for each further kg of body weight. The deficit volume is calculated as the maintenance volume multiplied by fasting hours and given as follows: 50% of the volume in the first hour, 25% of the volume in the second hour, and 25% of the volume in the third hour, in addition to the aforementioned maintenance volume
restricted group, RG
EXPERIMENTALPatients in the RG receives Ringer's lactate solution at a rate of 3 ml/kg/h from the start to the end of surgery.
Interventions
Lung ultrasound with a curvilinear probe (DDED) is performed in all patients in a supine position on the lateral wall of the chest at approximately the level of the lower ribs using an ultrasound probe at a frequency of 4-12 MHz (AcusonX300, Siemens Korea, Seoul, South Korea). The mean number of B-lines detected on the ultrasound image and the percentage of patients who showed B-lines on their images were recorded. The mean of three measurements is used. Inter-observer variability is estimated to be 0.766 (95% confidence interval 0.675-0.847).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- scheduled for repair of penile hypospadias with American Society of Anaesthesiologists' physical status of class I-II.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with pulmonary, cardiovascular, or hematological disorders or a family history of allergy to local anesthetics or lung disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
anesthesia department at Cairo University
Cairo, Elmanial, 11562, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
1. Joshua IS. Perioperative fluid restriction. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2013;26:197-202. 2. Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, Cox BP, Fearon KC, Feldman LS, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: Consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016;60:289-334. 3. Varadhan KK, Lobo DN. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: Getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc 2010;69:488-9. 4. Shin CH, Long DR, McLean D, Grabitz SD, Ladha K, Timm FP, et al. Effects of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcomes: A hospital registry study. Ann Surg 2018;267:1084-92.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Elsonbaty, M.D.
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2020
First Posted
June 23, 2020
Study Start
August 2, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 25, 2020
Last Updated
June 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
not to be shared