Comparison of Continuous Feeding and Sequential Feeding on Gut Microbiota and Metabolomics in Critically Ill Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
158
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Continuous feeding is the most popular enteral feeding mode in the ICU because of its lower nursing burden and theoretically better intestinal toleration. However, continuous feeding is nonphysiological. We proposed a feeding mode called sequential feeding, as it utilizes a combination of continuous feeding in the beginning, time-restricted feeding in the second stage, and oral feeding at last. The gut microbiota plays a critical role in human health due to its many useful functions. Not only dietary structure but also eating mode (eating time for example) influenced the gut microbiota in a healthy population. Therefore, we think this new feeding mode, sequential feeding, also has different influences on gut microbiota and metabolomics in critically ill patients compared to continuous feeding.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2022
CompletedNovember 14, 2022
November 1, 2022
2 years
June 21, 2020
November 9, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Shannon index
Shannon index is a paramater of α diversity in gut microbiota Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis using QIIME software
at the time point of 7th feeding day after achieving ≥80% of the nutrition target calories
Secondary Outcomes (2)
bacteria bundance
at the time point of 7th feeding day after achieving ≥80% of the nutrition target calories
numbers of compounds
at the time point of 7th feeding day after achieving ≥80% of the nutrition target calories
Study Arms (2)
continuous feeding
SHAM COMPARATORThe total amount of every days' Enteral Nutritional Suspension was fed at constant speed for 24h
sequential feeding
EXPERIMENTALThis feeding mode utilizes a combination of continuous feeding in the beginning, time-restricted feeding in the second stage and oral feeding in the last stage
Interventions
At the beginning, all the patients received continuous feeding. After achieving ≥80% of the nutrition target calories (25-30 kcal/kg/d) through continuous feeding, the patients were randomly assigned into the sequential feeding (SF) group or the continuous feeding (CF) group with a random number table. Patients in the CF group received continuous feeding with constant velocity by enteral feeding pump over one day.
At the beginning, all the patients received continuous feeding. After achieving ≥80% of the nutrition target calories (25-30 kcal/kg/d) through continuous feeding, the patients were randomly assigned into the sequential feeding (SF) group or the continuous feeding (CF) group with a random number table. In the SF group, continuous feeding was changed into time-restricted feeding. The total daily dosage of enteral nutrition was equally distributed during three time periods at 7-9:00, 11-13:00 and 17-19:00. Other times of the day were fasting times. Enteral nutritional suspension in each time period was administered at a uniform rate within two hours by an enteral feeding pump.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ●Patients newly admitted to the ICU and fed through gastric tubes
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with the ability to eat orally at admission
- Patients with diabetes or gastrointestinal disease
- Patients who are unable to tolerate enteral feeding
- An estimated feeding time of less than 7 days
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The affiliated hospital of qingdao university
Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
Related Publications (6)
McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, McCarthy MS, Davanos E, Rice TW, Cresci GA, Gervasio JM, Sacks GS, Roberts PR, Compher C; Society of Critical Care Medicine; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Feb;40(2):159-211. doi: 10.1177/0148607115621863. No abstract available.
PMID: 26773077RESULTSinger P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, Hiesmayr M, Mayer K, Montejo JC, Pichard C, Preiser JC, van Zanten ARH, Oczkowski S, Szczeklik W, Bischoff SC. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):48-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
PMID: 30348463RESULTLynch SV, Pedersen O. The Human Intestinal Microbiome in Health and Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2369-2379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1600266. No abstract available.
PMID: 27974040RESULTMcDonald D, Ackermann G, Khailova L, Baird C, Heyland D, Kozar R, Lemieux M, Derenski K, King J, Vis-Kampen C, Knight R, Wischmeyer PE. Extreme Dysbiosis of the Microbiome in Critical Illness. mSphere. 2016 Aug 31;1(4):e00199-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00199-16. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.
PMID: 27602409RESULTKaczmarek JL, Thompson SV, Holscher HD. Complex interactions of circadian rhythms, eating behaviors, and the gastrointestinal microbiota and their potential impact on health. Nutr Rev. 2017 Sep 1;75(9):673-682. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux036.
PMID: 28938796RESULTYao B, Liu JY, Liu Y, Song XX, Wang SB, Liu N, Dong ZH, Yuan ZY, Han XN, Xing JY. Sequential versus continuous feeding and its effect on the gut microbiota in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025 Apr;66:245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.019. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
PMID: 39798866DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bo Yao, phD
The affiliated hospital of Qingdao
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinician of critical care medicine, principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2020
First Posted
June 23, 2020
Study Start
July 2, 2020
Primary Completion
June 28, 2022
Study Completion
June 28, 2022
Last Updated
November 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
- Time Frame
- connect to corresponding author by email after paper publication
- Access Criteria
- by appropriate reasons
connect to corresponding author by email after paper publication