Ethical and Psychological Support for Health Care Professions in Intensive Care Units in the COVID19 Pandemic Context: Adequacy With Needs and Psychological Impact Crisis and Post-crisis

NCT04441476 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: QUENOT SERI 2020
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 3,080
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The intensive care unit occupies a particular place in our health care system. The urgency of the clinical situations, the proportion of deaths encountered, and the daily workload is likely to generate suffering among staff. The health crisis linked to SARS-COV-2 is unprecedented and has leads to the unprecedented mobilisation of care providers, particularly in the ICU. Faced with the massive and growing influx of patients, human, therapeutic and material resources are overwhelmed and the teams are faced with an unusually heavy workload in a context of extreme tension. These professionals are thus exposed to a risk of over-investment, in a context of acute and repetitive stress, over an indeterminate period of time combining workload, emotional intensity with specific ethical issues, simultaneously affecting the professional sphere but also the personal and family sphere (confinement, risk of contamination). Now more than ever, the mental health of caregivers is an important concern, as highlighted by the CCNE. Mental health is understood in the way in which the individual responds specifically to work-related suffering by developing individual and collective defensive strategies. Thus, the issue of mental health in the ICU cannot be considered without taking into account the strategies that professionals put in place to combat stress and to contribute or not to the construction and stabilization of the work collective (collaboration, support). Ethical and/or psychological support systems have been set up in most of the establishments involved in the care of Covid-19 patients. However, the adequacy of these systems relative to the needs of professionals during and after the crisis is not yet known. We hypothesize that the psychological and social repercussions of this pandemic as well as the individual and collective strategies deployed by ICU care providers to deal with it will evolve in view of the progression of the crisis but also of the various types of support, particularly psychological and/or ethical, available to them.

Conditions

Psychological Strain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• PS-ICU Scale Score

  This scale integrates generic stressors as well as factors specific to intensive care and crises.

  Through study completion, an average of 6 months after the epidemic peak

Study Arms (1)

ICU staff

Other: Questionnaires; Other: psychological and sociological interviews

Interventions

Questionnaires OTHER

An online questionnaire (Limesurvey platform) will be made available at 4 different times (M0, M1, M2 and M6). * The first questionnaires (M0 and M1) will include a component for professional characterization. Generic and specific stress factors related to ICU and the current pandemic and collective and individual defensive strategies will also be collected in M0 and M1. * At M2 and M6, the traumatic impact of the crisis, burnout, signs of depression and recourse to internal or external support in the department (occupational medicine, support unit) will be collected.

ICU staff

psychological and sociological interviews OTHER

conducting semi-directive psychological interviews (40 interviews in M2, 40 interviews in M6). sociological interviews: 40 (20 in M1-M2 then 20 in M6) in order to understand the consequences of the epidemic on daily life, both intra-family and micro-social.

ICU staff

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

nursing staff in French hospitals

You may qualify if:

• The study population is the entire ICU staff of the participating centres, whether they are permanently or transiently assigned to these units and/or the institution, whether they are students or not.
• Professionals involved in psychological and ethical support structures may also be interviewed to provide the information necessary to describe and evaluate the organisations and their evolution.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon: lead

Study Sites (1)

Chu Dijon Bourgogne

Dijon, 21000, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data Collection; Epidemiologic Methods; Investigative Techniques; Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms; Quality of Health Care; Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation; Public Health; Environment and Public Health

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 17, 2020
• First Posted: June 22, 2020
• Study Start: April 21, 2020
• Primary Completion: December 21, 2020
• Study Completion: December 21, 2020
• Last Updated: March 30, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-06

Locations

FR (1)