Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM (Comparative Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Limited mobility of the uterine cervix and alignment with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). Currently, the available instruments are traumatic tenacula, which could cause pain and bleeding and therefore represent an obstacle for certain patients to pursue their medical follow-up. AspivixTM is a new device, which enables atraumatic traction of the cervix while respecting its specific semi-circular anatomic shape through a system powered by a vacuum chamber. The aim of our comparative study is to assess the patient's pain and bleeding using the AspivixTM device in comparison with a commonly used single-tooth tenaculum (Pozzi forceps). Additionally, the comparative study aims to assess and compare the safety of the AspivixTM device with the single-tooth tenaculum (Pozzi forceps). Note: Study is made of 2 phases (pilot phase followed by a comparative phase). Details regarding pilot study is registered separately.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2022
CompletedFebruary 15, 2022
February 1, 2022
10 months
June 15, 2020
February 14, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale
Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.
Before the procedure
Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale
Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.
During speculum insertion
Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale
Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.
During AspivixTM / standard tenaculum application
Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale
Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.
During application of cervical traction
Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale
Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.
During IUD insertion
Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale
Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.
During AspivixTM / standard tenaculum release
Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale
Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The number of placement attempts before traction can be applied
During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.
The number of spontaneous releases
During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.
Assessment of the efficacy of the investigational device and its comparator by the practitioner
During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.
Assessment of bleeding
During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.
Assessment of adverse events
During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Single-tooth tenaculum (Pozzi forceps)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the control arm, a single-tooth tenaculum, Pozzi forceps, used during routine IUD insertion, is employed to hold and stabilize the cervix.
AspivixTM cervical vacuum tenaculum
EXPERIMENTALIn the experimental arm, the investigational AspivixTM cervical vacuum tenaculum is employed to hold and stabilize the cervix.
Interventions
Limited mobility of the uterine cervix and alignment with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants older than 18 years
- Participants presenting at the outpatient clinic IUD insertion of Mirena (BAYER), Kyleena (BAYER), Jaydess (BAYER), NOVAT 380 (BAYER), NT Cu380 mini (MONALISA), NT Cu380 (MONALISA), CuT 380A (MONALISA) or CuT 380A QL (MONALISA).
- Participants able to provide informed consent as documented by signature with at least 24 hours of reflection time
- Good understanding of written and oral speaking used at the centre where the study will be carried out.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who are contraindicated for the insertion of the IUD Mirena (BAYER), Kyleena (BAYER), Jaydess (BAYER), NOVAT 380 (BAYER), NT Cu380 mini (MONALISA), NT Cu380 (MONALISA), CuT 380A (MONALISA) or CuT 380A QL (MONALISA).
- Participants under use of excessive alcohol, narcotics or benzodiazepines prior to procedure
- Participants who do not wish to be informed of a chance discovery
- Participant receiving anaesthetics prior to IUD insertion procedure
- Participants on anticoagulant medication
- Participants under use of an analgesic (\< 12 hours)
- Previous cervical operation
- Severe vaginal bleeding of unknown origin
- Participant previously enrolled in this study
- Cervix diameter smaller than 26 mm
- Nabothian cyst
- Cervical myomas
- Cervical condylomas
- Squamous intraepithelial lesion (Cervical dysplasia)
- Cervical endometriosis
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aspivix SAlead
Study Sites (2)
HUG - Department Women, Child & Adolescent
Geneva, Canton of Vaud, 1205, Switzerland
Department Women, Mother & Child, University Hospital
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrice Mathevet, Prof.
DFME CHUV Lausanne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Single-blinded - Participants will be blinded towards the intervention used. Additionally, the type of device used will only be revealed to the practitioner after randomization, immediately prior IUD insertion.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2020
First Posted
June 22, 2020
Study Start
April 30, 2021
Primary Completion
February 14, 2022
Study Completion
February 15, 2022
Last Updated
February 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02