Feasibility of Wearable Activity Trackers for Detection of TOXicity in People Receiving Systemic Anticancer Treatment
WATTOX
Remote Monitoring of Wearable Activity Trackers for Detection of TOXicity in People Receiving Systemic Anticancer Treatment: a Feasibility Study
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Accurate evaluation of activity status is an important part of the assessment of people with cancer. Clinician assessments currently used are valuable but have limitations; in particular, assessment only occurs when the patient attends clinic and is often subjective. Activity trackers, such as FitBits, give the opportunity to objectively assess activity status continuously, independent of clinic visits. Previous studies have shown that a reduction in 1000 steps while receiving cancer treatment is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation but it is not known if using information from activity trackers to allow early intervention is feasible or if it can reduce admission to hospital and improve outcomes. The investigators propose a prospective feasibility study in people with advanced lung cancer or upper gastrointestinal cancers who are starting a new line of systemic anti-cancer therapy. Participants will receive a FitBit, which is a commercially available wearable activity tracker for the duration of their treatment or 4 months (whichever is shorter). Step counts will be monitored and a reduction in daily steps of \>1000 from baseline will trigger contact by the study team and an ambulatory review. Participants will not receive treatment within the context of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedJune 22, 2020
June 1, 2020
1 year
February 19, 2020
June 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of monitoring reductions in step count in people with advanced lung cancer or upper gastrointestinal cancers starting systemic anti-cancer therapy.
Feasibility of step count monitoring will be determined by measuring the proportion of participants for whom step count was successfully monitored (step count checked for at least 4 out 5 weekdays) for at least 80% of the treatment weeks during the study period. Successful monitoring is defined as a member of the study team logging in to the Fitabase system to review the step count. If 80% of participants are monitored for 80% of the observational time (from the start until the end of treatment - either at completion or if treatment is stopped), this will be considered feasible.
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
Feasibility of undertaking a timely ambulatory review, of participants in whom a reduction of steps is detected
Feasibility of a timely ambulatory review will be determined by measuring the proportion of participants who are invited for an ambulatory review and attend within 24 hours. If 70% of participants invited for a review attend, this will be considered feasible.
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Participant compliance with use of activity monitor
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
Utility of monitoring steps counts as a trigger for ambulatory assessment for the identification of new or worsening adverse events in people with cancer.
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
Sensitivity of monitoring steps counts for the identification of new or worsening adverse events in people with cancer
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
Number of hospitalisation episodes.
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
Proportion of hospitalisation episodes associated with WAT-triggered ambulatory reviews.
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Correlation between steps count, physician assessed WHO performance status (PS), quality of life (QoL) and muscle mass/attenuation/function
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
Correlation between resting heart rate, hospitalisation and muscle mass/attenuation/function
Analysis 4 months after last patient recruited
Study Arms (1)
Study participants
All patients will receive the intervention
Interventions
Participants will be given a wearable activity tracker and their daily step count recorded. If there is a reduction from baseline of over 1000 steps, the participant will be contacted and an ambulatory review organised if the reduction is not due to a device compliance issue
Eligibility Criteria
The participant population whose data will be subjected to the study analysis includes registered patients for whom baseline median daily step count was available and who were compliant with wearing the device during the follow up.
You may qualify if:
- Age \>/= 18.
- Advanced lung (NSCLC or SCLC) cancer or patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer (gastric, oesophageal, pancreatic) starting a new line of systemic anti-cancer therapy.
- Willingness to wear an activity tracker and undergo remote monitoring
- Access to a smart phone.
- Willingness to have a Fitbit App installed on their smartphone
- Willingness to have a pseudo- anonymised FitBit account created for the purposes of the study
- PS 0-2.
- or more previous lines of treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Physical conditions that preclude daily walking
- Inability to give informed consent.
- Medical or psychiatric condition which in the investigators opinion would affect the successful completion of the study.
- Immediate need to start systemic anticancer therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust - London and Surrey
London, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Ohri N, Kabarriti R, Bodner WR, Mehta KJ, Shankar V, Halmos B, Haigentz M Jr, Rapkin B, Guha C, Kalnicki S, Garg M. Continuous Activity Monitoring During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):1061-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.030. Epub 2016 Dec 25.
PMID: 28332990BACKGROUNDGresham G, Hendifar AE, Spiegel B, Neeman E, Tuli R, Rimel BJ, Figlin RA, Meinert CL, Piantadosi S, Shinde AM. Wearable activity monitors to assess performance status and predict clinical outcomes in advanced cancer patients. NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Jul 5;1:27. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0032-6. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 31304309BACKGROUNDPrince RM, Powis M, Zer A, Atenafu EG, Krzyzanowska MK. Hospitalisations and emergency department visits in cancer patients receiving systemic therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12909. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12909. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
PMID: 30238542BACKGROUNDBennett AV, Reeve BB, Basch EM, Mitchell SA, Meeneghan M, Battaglini CL, Smith-Ryan AE, Phillips B, Shea TC, Wood WA. Evaluation of pedometry as a patient-centered outcome in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT): a comparison of pedometry and patient reports of symptoms, health, and quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar;25(3):535-46. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1179-0. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
PMID: 26577763BACKGROUNDSpruit MA, Sillen MJ, Groenen MT, Wouters EF, Franssen FM. New normative values for handgrip strength: results from the UK Biobank. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Oct;14(10):775.e5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
PMID: 23958225BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nadia Yousaf
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2020
First Posted
June 22, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
June 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share