TeamSTEPPS in School Mental Health
Adapting and Implementing TeamSTEPPS in School Mental Health
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) is an evidence-based approach for teams that can be adapted for school mental health. TeamSTEPPS has been widely disseminated in health care settings with promising outcomes. TeamSTEPPS is designed to build competencies in the areas of leadership, situation monitoring, mutual support, and communication and has been associated with improvements in teamwork and communication as well as patient outcomes, such as decreased seclusion in psychiatric hospitals. This approach has yet to be extended as an implementation strategy in school or community mental health teams. If an evidence-based team approach like TeamSTEPPS can be successfully applied to school mental health teams, it could provide a cost-effective strategy for improving student mental health services and bolstering existing EBP implementation efforts, which to date generally have been insufficient in producing long-term clinician behavior change. In Aim 1 the investigators will capture key stakeholder perspectives about challenges in collocated school mental health services through formative work to inform collaborative planning and capacity building activities in Aim 2. Then, in Aim 2 the investigators will identify inter-organizational challenges and required components of TeamSTEPPS to adapt. The investigators will establish an advisory board and adapt TeamSTEPPS. The product of Aim 2 will be an adapted TeamSTEPPS, directed toward both school mental health and school-employed personnel, and specific, tailored implementation strategies to improve services in schools in conjunction with TeamSTEPPS. Finally, In Aim 3 the investigators will explore the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of TeamSTEPPS and the strategies generated in Aim 2 on inter-professional collaboration, teamwork, and student outcomes in eight schools.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 12, 2025
CompletedNovember 12, 2025
October 1, 2025
1.9 years
June 8, 2020
August 28, 2025
October 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Reliable and validated 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the feasibility of an intervention (in this case, TeamSTEPPS training). Each item may be scored 1 = "completely disagree", 2 = "disagree", 3 = "neither agree nor disagree", 4 = "agree", or 5 = "completely agree." An overall mean score (possible score range from 1 to 5) across the 4 items is computed, where higher scores indicate more positive perceptions of intervention feasibility.
assessed immediately post-training in TeamSTEPPS (on average, 4 hours after completion of baseline measures)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Reliable and validated 4-item observational tool to assess perceptions of the acceptability of an intervention (in this case, TeamSTEPPS training). Each item may be scored 1 = "completely disagree", 2 = "disagree", 3 = "neither agree nor disagree", 4 = "agree", or 5 = "completely agree." An overall mean score (possible score range from 1 to 5) across the 4 items is computed, where higher scores indicate greater perceptions of intervention acceptability.
assessed immediately post-training in TeamSTEPPS (on average, 4 hours after completion of baseline measures)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Oxford Non-Technical Skills (NOTECHS) Scale
Assessed at baseline (i.e., on average, 1 week prior to training in TeamSTEPPS), immediately post-training in TeamSTEPPS (on average, 1 week after completion of baseline observation), and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups.
Other Outcomes (3)
Expanded School Mental Health Collaboration Instrument (ESMHCI)
Assessed at baseline (i.e., pre-training in TeamSTEPPS) and and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Six- and 12-month follow-up scores were averaged to create a single follow-up score.
TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ)
Assessed at baseline (i.e., pre-training in TeamSTEPPS) and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Six- and 12-month follow-up scores were averaged to create a single follow-up score.
TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ)
Assessed at baseline (i.e., pre-training in TeamSTEPPS) and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Six- and 12-month follow-up scores were averaged to create a single follow-up score.
Study Arms (1)
Schools implementing TeamSTEPPS
EXPERIMENTALSelect schools will take a participatory approach to collaboratively identify solutions to challenges in collocated school-based mental health services based upon the feedback of stakeholders and use TeamSTEPPS to support mental health team-school collaboration.
Interventions
TeamSTEPPS is an evidence-based approach for teams that can be adapted for school mental health. Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS), has been widely disseminated in health care settings with promising outcomes. TeamSTEPPS is designed to build competencies in the areas of leadership, situation monitoring, mutual support, and communication and has been associated with improvements in teamwork and communication as well as patient outcomes, such as decreased seclusion in psychiatric hospitals.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be one of the following: mental health providers, teachers, leaders from schools (e.g., principals), leaders from community mental health agencies (i.e., executive directors, clinical supervisors), and leadership personnel from the payer or partner school district.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kuriyan A, Kinkler G, Cidav Z, Kang-Yi C, Eiraldi R, Salas E, Wolk CB. Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) to Improve Collaboration in School Mental Health: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Feb 8;10(2):e26567. doi: 10.2196/26567.
PMID: 33555258DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Courtney Wolk
- Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Courtney Benjamin Wolk, PhD
University of Pennsylvania
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2020
First Posted
June 19, 2020
Study Start
May 23, 2022
Primary Completion
April 30, 2024
Study Completion
April 30, 2024
Last Updated
November 12, 2025
Results First Posted
November 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- The descriptive data will be uploaded every six months during data collection periods of the study. All other data will be submitted at time of the publication of the manuscripts describing our main findings.
- Access Criteria
- Any data directly shared with other investigators would entail a data-use agreement, signed by the research team, our system partners, and the individual(s) requesting data, and that accounts for (1) commitment to using the data only for research and as outlined and approved in the agreement; (2) IRB approval at the host institution, (3) a plan for securing the data using appropriate technology, and (4) an agreed upon plan to destroy or return the data upon completion. In such cases, we will make the data and associated documentation available to users under our own auspices, such as by sending an encrypted hard-drive to users.
We will make data from our trial available for other researchers by uploading it to the National Clinical Trials Database. The proposed research will include data from 95 school mental health providers, teachers, and administrators and supervisors overseeing school mental health services in Philadelphia public schools. The final dataset will include quantitative (socio-demographic characteristics, school characteristics, outcomes, and contextual predictors of implementation) data. We will collect identifiers required to create a Global Unique Identifier (GUID) that will allow for inclusions in the National Database of Clinical Trials. We also will include recommended language in our consent forms related to obtain participant permission to upload their data to the National Database.