Laparoscopic Versus Open Mesh Repair of Bilateral Primary Inguinal Hernia
1 other identifier
interventional
180
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The best approach for simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernia is controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes after laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2020
CompletedJune 18, 2020
June 1, 2020
3 years
June 16, 2020
June 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Operative time
Operative time (in minutes)
From skin incision until incision closure at the end of surgery
Postoperative pain after 24 hours
Pain intensity was assessed 24 hours after surgery using the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) with values ranging from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)
24 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain after 7 days
Pain intensity was assessed 7 days after surgery using the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) with values ranging from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)
7 days after surgery
Early postoperative complications
All complication related to surgery developed within 30 days after the surgery
Within 30 days after the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Chronic Groin pain
After 3 months postoperatively
3 years hernia recurrence rate
within 3 years after surgery
Patient's satisfaction score
within 3 years after surgery
Study Arms (3)
Laparoscopic Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (Lap TAPP group))
ACTIVE COMPARATORBoth hernias were treated by laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair using 2 separate meshes fixed by endoscopic tackers
Open Pre-Peritoneal Repair ( Open PP group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORBoth hernias were treated by open pre-peritoneal single mesh repair with suture fixation
Bilateral Lichtenstein repair (LICHT group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORtreated by bilateral standard Lichtenstein repair using 2 separate meshes with suture fixation
Interventions
Laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair using 2 separate meshes fixed by endoscopic tackers
Open pre-peritoneal single mesh repair with suture fixation
Bilateral standard Lichtenstein repair using 2 separate meshes with suture fixation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with painless uncomplicated primary bilateral inguinal hernias
You may not qualify if:
- Immune compromised patients
- Coagulopathy
- Chronic liver or renal disease
- High-risk patients unfit for major surgery (ASA III or IV),
- Massive scrotal hernias, Recurrent or Complicated hernias
- Groin pain due to any other pathology
- Previous infra-umbilical surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Sarli L, Iusco DR, Sansebastiano G, Costi R. Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of open, tension-free versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Aug;11(4):262-7. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200108000-00007.
PMID: 11525372BACKGROUNDFeliu X, Claveria R, Besora P, Camps J, Fernandez-Sallent E, Vinas X, Abad JM. Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or open approach? Hernia. 2011 Feb;15(1):15-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0736-2. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
PMID: 20960019BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Elmessiry, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Sealed opaque envelopes containing computer generated random numbers
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2020
First Posted
June 18, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share