The Assessment of the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients With Alzheimer Disease or Parkinson Disease With Cognitive Impairment by Using Diffusion MRI
1 other identifier
observational
212
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The hypothesis is that the differential extent of microstructural damages in the affected brain regions can be specific to the disease of interest and could reflect the clinical severity. Therefore, the investigator propose that whole brain parcellation of diffusion MRI can be used to improve diagnosis and prediction of clinical outcomes in Parkinson's Disease.
- 1.A regression model between clinical severity and two year clinical outcomes and diffusion properties from multiple parcellated regions will be developed.
- 2.Blind validation will be performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2017
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedAugust 6, 2021
August 1, 2021
1 year
July 17, 2018
August 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
An objective image-based evidence for the diagnosis, differential diagnosis and prognosis of Parkinson's Disease
The following will be measured for the diagnostic performance of diffusion MRI: 1. Regression between cognitive performance and baseline diffusion MRI using Pearson correlation 2. Leave one out cross validation
end of the third year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Imaging
end of the third year
Imaging
end of the third year
Deep learning techniques
end of the third year
Prognosis
end of the third year
Prognosis
end of the third year
Study Arms (3)
Mild cognitive impairment patients
The patients with mild cognitive impairment have a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0.5. First, we will evaluate the correlation between diffusion MRI and the clinical severity and cognitive decline of patients. Second, we will evaluate if diffusion MRI can predict if these patients will develop Alzheimer's Disease and hence be involved in the third year of the study. Patients with mild cognitive impairment should meet the following criteria: 1. Between 50-80 years old 2. Right-handed 3. Clinical Dementia Rating score equal to 0.5 4. For patients who have a CDR score of 0.5, should be diagnosed by clinician's judgement of clinical information, daily living activities, and extent of neuropsychological disorders 5. Able to understand study requirements and give informed consent
Parkinson's Disease patients
This group consists of patients starting from 2012 to 2013 and includes 87 patients with typical Parkinson's Disease (PD), 15 patients with Progressive Supranuclear Paralysis (PSP), 15 patients with Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), and 15 patients with Cortico-Basal Degeneration (CBD). In differential diagnosis in the first year of the study, diffusion MRI will be used for a retrospective study.
Healthy volunteers
The healthy volunteers should meet the following criteria: 1. Between 50-80 years old 2. Right-handed 3. MMSE score greater than or equal to 26 4. Able to understand study requirements and give informed consent
Eligibility Criteria
For each specific disease group, the following criteria should be meet: Healthy volunteers: MMSE score greater than or equal to 26. Mild cognitive impairment patients: a) Clinical Dementia Rating score equal to 0.5, b) Be diagnosed by clinician's judgement of clinical information. MSA patients should fulfill the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health criteria. PSP patients should fulfil the NINDS-SPSP and Litvan criteria. CBD patients should fulfil the NINDS-SPSP criteria, including limb stiffness or hypokinesia, dystonia, myoclonus, speaking disorders, and cortical sensory loss. The PD patients should be besides the age of onset, fulfil the NINDS-SPSP criteria.
You may qualify if:
- All subjects should meet the following criteria:
- Between 50-80 years old
- Right-handed
- Able to understand study requirements and give informed consent
- Agree to return for follow-up checks
- Able to suspend intake of medication for at least 12 hours
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator implantation Intracranial metal device implantation
- Other major systemic diseases, such as renal failure, heart failure, stroke, AMI/unstable angina, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, poorly controlled hypertension
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Moderate to severe dementia
- Severe movement disorders
- History of intracranial surgery including thalamotomy, pallidotomy, and/or deep brain stimulation
- Major physical or neuropsychiatric disorders
- Structural abnormalities that may cause dementia, such as cortical infarction, tumour, or subdural hematoma
- Besides medication for Parkinson's Disease, taking other medication with substances that can pass through the blood-brain barrier
- Besides medication for Parkinson's Disease, taking other medication for more than 10 years
- Treatments or concurrent illnesses other than Alzheimer's Disease that could interfere with cognitive function
- Meet the criteria for dementia (DSM-IV)
- Head trauma with loss of consciousness greater than 10 minutes
- Severe loss of sensation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ChangGung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
Taoyuan District, 333, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Study Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2018
First Posted
June 17, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
August 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08