NCT04434742

Brief Summary

Previous studies supporting discharged patients are hospital-based which admission criteria tend to include mainly those with complex needs and/or specific disease conditions. This study captured the service gap where these non-frail older patients might have no specific medical problem upon discharge but they might encounter residual health and social issues when returning home.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 19, 2017

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 11, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 17, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

June 11, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 13, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline Health-related quality of life: SF-12 at 3 months

    The goal for this program was to enable older adults to live with optimum quality of life in their own environment through receiving support from the collaboration of nurse case managers and social workers. Quality of life was measured by SF-12, which has been shown to be useful in Chinese elderly patients. The questionnaire has 12 items organized into eight categories (physical functioning, role limitation due to emotional and physical problems, mental health scale, general health, bodily pain, social functioning, and vitality), and has been validated in numerous studies.

    At baseline pre-intervention and at three months when the interventions were completed.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from baseline Activity of daily living at 3 months

    At baseline pre-intervention and at three months when the interventions were completed.

  • Change from baseline Presence of depressive symptoms at 3 months

    At baseline pre-intervention and at three months when the interventions were completed.

  • Change from Total number of unplanned outpatient department, general practitioner, and emergency department visits, hospital admissions and total number of health service attendances at 3 months

    At baseline pre-intervention and at three months when the interventions were completed.

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

The subjects in this group receive complex interventions, including structured assessment, health education, goal empowerment, and care coordination supported by a health-social team.

Other: Complex interventions

Control group

OTHER

The control group received usual discharge care and community resources that were made available to them as appropriate. A monthly social call was made to each client in the control group in order to exclude social effects. The contents of the social call, such as asking about entertainment and clients' hobbies, were set in the protocol.

Other: Usual care

Interventions

An advanced practice nurse (APN) from a hospital discharge team visited them to familiarize him/herself with their condition and prepare a discharge plan. A face-to-face or telephone call handover between the APN and the project nurse case manager (NCM) was performed before the client was discharged. The past and current medical conditions, medical and nursing management, and follow-up appointments were discussed. After discharge home, the NCM, functioning as the leader of health-social care team, conducted the initial assessment in the first home visit to identify the client's health and social problems within one week of discharge. Community workers, supervised by both the nurse case manager and social worker, provided telephone follow-up and subsequent home visits to monitor the client's progress and provide support when necessary.

Intervention group

Social call was given to this group.

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • resided in the service areas of the study hospital,
  • were aged 60 or over,
  • were cognitively competent with a score greater than 26 in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hong Kong version,
  • were living at home before and after discharge from the hospital,
  • had scores of \<5 on the Clinical Frailty Scale (Note: a patient is considered to be non-frail if they have a score less than 5), and
  • were fit for medical discharge

You may not qualify if:

  • were not able to communicate,
  • could not be reached by phone,
  • were bed-bound,
  • had active psychiatric problems,
  • were already engaged in other structured health or social programs, and
  • would not be staying in Hong Kong for the three months of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Kowloon, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Wong AKC, Wong FKY, Ngai JSC, Hung SYK, Li WC. Effectiveness of a health-social partnership program for discharged non-frail older adults: a pilot study. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01722-5.

Study Officials

  • Arkers KC Wong, Dr

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical associate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2020

First Posted

June 17, 2020

Study Start

June 19, 2017

Primary Completion

April 30, 2020

Study Completion

April 30, 2020

Last Updated

June 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Locations