Comparison of the Effects of Home Exercise and Isokinetic Exercise Program in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of home exercise program and isokinetic exercise program on pain, muscle strength, functionality, proprioception sensation and quality of life in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedJune 18, 2020
June 1, 2020
6 months
June 9, 2020
June 16, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Assessment of shoulder examination findings
The investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment shoulder examination findings. The investigators used to painful arc test consisting of 13 questions that scored from zero to ten.
3 months
Assessment of shoulder functions
The investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment shoulder functions and muscle strenght. The investigators used to Constant-Murley functional evaluate scale consisting of four parameters that scored from zero to one hundered.
3 months
Assessment of muscle strenght
The investigators evaluated it with isokinetic cybex dynamometer. The isokinetic cybex dynamometer assessments using newton-meter for muscle strenght and angle degree for velocity measurements.
3 months
Assessment of quality of life
The investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment quality of life values with Pittsburg sleep quality index. The Pittsburg sleep quality index consisting of 23 questions that scored from zero to three.
3 months
Assessment of sense of proprioseption
The investigators evaluated it with isokinetic cybex dynamometer. The isokinetic cybex dynamometer assessments using angle degree for sense of position.
3 months
Assessment of shoulder pain
The investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment for shoulder pain. The investigators used to visual analog score for pain that scored from zero to ten.
3 months
Assessment of shoulder disability
The investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment for shoulder disability. The investigators used to shoulder disability questionnare consisting of 16 questions that scored yes or no. Calculation; score = \[Yes counts / (Yes counts + No counts)\]x100. The score seems, zero point is maximal fine health and 100 points (maximal point) is poor health.
3 months
Assessment of physical health situation
The investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment for physical health situation. The investigators used to health evaluated inventory. The inventroy consisting of 20 questions that scored from zero to three per question. Zero point is maximal fine health and 60 points are maximal poor health.
3 months
Study Arms (2)
isokinetic exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group (isokinetic exercise group, n = 25) was given isokinetic exercise.
home exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group(home exercise group, n=25) was given home exercise program.
Interventions
Compare and evaluate of the effects of the routin physical medicine and rehabilitation programs in impingement patients
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Shoulder pain and functional disability at least 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Instability of shoulder, Stage 2-3 adhesive capsulitis, tendinitis or bursitis, cervical radiculopathy, underwent surgery, norological diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prof Dr Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital
Istanbul, 34384, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Akman S, Kucukkaya M. [Subacromial impingement syndrome: pathogenesis, clinical features, and examination methods]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2003;37 Suppl 1:27-34. Turkish.
PMID: 14578662RESULTCampbell RS, Dunn A. External impingement of the shoulder. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2008 Jun;12(2):107-26. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1078699.
PMID: 18509791RESULT
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
OMER KURU, FULL PROF
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Administrative Director of PMR Clinic
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2020
First Posted
June 16, 2020
Study Start
May 30, 2018
Primary Completion
November 30, 2018
Study Completion
November 30, 2018
Last Updated
June 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share