Early Oral Feeding vs Traditional Post-operative Care In Emergency Abdominal Surgeries
EARLY ORAL FEEDING VS TRADITIONAL POST-OPERATIVE CARE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING EMERGENCY ABDOMINAL SURGERY FOR PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER(Emergency Abdominal Surgeries)
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely studied in elective abdominal surgeries and have shown better outcomes. However the utility of these protocols in emergency abdominal surgeries has not been widely investigated. OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of application of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcers repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Surgical Unit 1 BBH from August 2018 to December 2019 with a total sample size of 36 patients with the diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer. Patients were randomly divided in two groups. Group A consisted of early oral feeding group and group B consisted of traditional postoperative care group. Outcome results studied were the length of hospital stay, duodenal repair site leak, severity of pain (VAS score) and duration of post-operative ileus. Results were analysed on SPSS version 20 and chi-square and independent t-test were applied. KEY WORDS: Perforated duodenal ulcer, ERAS protocol, randomized controlled trial, duodenal repair site leak, length of hospital stay, VAS score, post-operative ileus
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedJune 16, 2020
June 1, 2020
1.2 years
June 3, 2020
June 12, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay is defined as duration of single episode of hospitalization. Inpatient days are calculated by subtracting day of admission from day of discharge
upto 10 Days
DAYS OF RETURN OF BOWEL FUNCTION.
It is defined as time to passage of flatus or stools after abdominal surgery.
Upto 24 hours
Pain score by Visual Analog Scale
Pain is defined as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience that is associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in such terms" according to International Association for the Study of Pain,measured by Visual Analog Scale(VAS).
upto 36 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Bleeding peptic ulcer
intraoperative period
Mortality rate
immediate postoperative period
Other Outcomes (1)
Gender distribution
Perioperative period
Study Arms (2)
Early oral feeding group(A)
EXPERIMENTALPatients admitted in the HDU postoperatively.NG tube and foley's catheter removed within 12 hours and patients allowed oral sips on day 1 with gradual shift to liquid diet after 12 hrs and semisolid food started after 24 hours later.Patients were given i/v antibiotics,painkillers and i/v PPIs and shifted to oral pain killers on 2nd POD.
Traditional postoperative care group(B)
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in this group were managed traditionally
Interventions
Early oral feeding refers to NG tube and foley's catheter removed within 12 hours and patients allowed oral sips on day 1 with gradual shift to liquid diet after 12 hrs and semisolid food started after 24 hours later.Patients were given i/v antibiotics,painkillers and i/v PPIs and shifted to oral pain killers on 2nd POD.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients older than 15 years with acute abdominal symptoms admitted in ER department, suspected as perforated duodenal ulcer and operated within 24 hours of admission by emergency department surgeon.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients presenting with the following criteria were excluded:
- Refusal to join the study
- Peptic ulcers with both bleeding and perforation.
- Spontaneously sealed off perforations.
- Malignant ulcers
- Concurrent extra-abdominal surgery
- Oral incapacity i.e endotracheal intubation
- Reoperation within a month
- ASA grade III/IV
- Alternative per operative diagnosis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Surgical Unit I,Benazir Bhutto Hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Patients admitted in the emergency department were randomly assigned into treatment group or control group in postoperative period.Neither the researcher nor the patient were aware of the patient allocation.Patients were management by the oncall surgical team irrespective of the researcher.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Postgraduate trainee, General Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2020
First Posted
June 16, 2020
Study Start
August 13, 2018
Primary Completion
October 30, 2019
Study Completion
December 27, 2019
Last Updated
June 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data can be shared on request.Only that described in the text of full article.