NCT04428697

Brief Summary

BACKGROUND: Currently, the lateral internal sphincterotomy is the treatment of choice for a chronic anal fissure. However, the length of the internal sphincter incision varies, due to lack of standardization. Insufficient length increases the risk of recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To compare a new ultra-modified internal sphincterotomy technique to the closed lateral sphincterotomy for treating chronic anal fissures, based on internal anal sphincter function and postoperative complications. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial (block randomization method) SETTING: Pamukkale University hospital in Denizli-Turkey PARTICIPANTS: 200 patients with chronic anal fissures INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Sungurtekin technique (n = 100; ultra-modified group), or the closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (n = 100; closed-lateral group). Follow-up was 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was chronic anal fissure healing. The secondary outcomes were complications, visual analog scale pain scores, sphincter pressures, and incontinence scores.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2020

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2020

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7 years

First QC Date

May 22, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 10, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Fissure-in-anoSphincterotomyİncontinenceSurgical technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Recurrence

    It has been reported in the literature that healing was completed in 6-8 weeks in patients undergoing this operation. During this period, it was accepted that the fissure was no longer detected as a visual examination finding and that patient complaints disappeared.

    1-24 month

  • Postoperatif pain

    The patients asked to record postoperative pain scores with VAS(Visual Analog Scale)Graded from 0.0 to 10.0. and measured postoperative day 3 .As low as possible this pain score value indicates that the patient is exposed to less pain.

    Postopetaive 3th day

  • Incontinence Rate

    Pre and postoperative fecal continence were scored using the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) scores. Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) scores were used to assess the severity of fecal incontinence at baseline, and at 12 months. The scores from 0 indicate perfect continence to a maximum of 20 indicates complete incontinence The CCF FI scale combines loss of flatus, liquid and solid stool, use of a pad and the impact on the quality of life a assess the severity of fecal incontinence.

    12th month

  • Complications

    Urinary retansion,ecchymosis,itching,bleeding,abscess,fistula has been accepted as postoperative complications

    1-24 month

Study Arms (2)

Sungurtekin Technique

EXPERIMENTAL

Sungurtekin technique was performed through the base of the posterior fissure; thus, no additional incision was necessary in the lithotomy position. The mucosa was dissected along the submucosal plane, starting at the hypertrophic papilla, and extended for 1.5 cm. After identifying both the internal and external sphincters completely, under direct vision, a 0.5-cm section of the bottom part of the internal anal sphincter was measured and marked with a ruler. This section was preserved during the operation in a standard fashion for all patients . Next, the internal sphincter bundle was measured with a sterile scale and a mark was placed at 1 cm towards the proximal end. The internal sphincter bundle was elevated with a right angle clamp, then cut with cautery . The operation was completed with meticulous hemostasis and additional suturing (3/0 absorbable suture) of the proximally dissected mucosal flap underlying the muscularis layer

Procedure: Sungurtekin Technique

Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The sphincterotomy was performed through a new incision, guided by the surgeon's finger, as described by Boulos et al Boulos PB, Araujo JG. Adequate internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: subcutaneous or open technique? The British journal of surgery 1984;71:360-2.

Procedure: Sungurtekin Technique

Interventions

Sungurtekin technique was performed through the base of the posterior fissure; thus, no additional incision was necessary in the lithotomy position. The mucosa was dissected along the submucosal plane, starting at the hypertrophic papilla, and extended for 1.5 cm, a 0.5-cm section of the bottom part of the internal anal sphincter was measured and marked with a ruler. Next, the internal sphincter bundle was measured with a sterile scale and a mark was placed at 1 cm towards the proximal end. The internal sphincter cut with cautery .

Closed Lateral Internal SphincterotomySungurtekin Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with CAFs that had failed conservative therapy and required surgical treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have a low resting anal pressure in manometric study (lower than 40 mmHg)
  • Recurrent anal fissure
  • Fissure location other than the posterior anal canal
  • Fissure due to inflammatory bowel or infectious disease
  • Acute anal fissure,
  • Fissure due to chronic diarrhea or anal stenosis
  • Anorectal malignancy
  • Patients undergone pelvic radiotherapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with history of diabetes, neurological disease and spinal cord lesions
  • Previous episiotomy history
  • Painless fissures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (25)

  • Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, Cassini D, Bettelli E, Brozzetti S. Total lateral sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 May;19(3):245-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0525-9. Epub 2003 Sep 9.

  • Gandomkar H, Zeinoddini A, Heidari R, Amoli HA. Partial lateral internal sphincterotomy versus combined botulinum toxin A injection and topical diltiazem in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):228-34. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000307.

  • Salih AM. Chronic anal fissures: Open lateral internal sphincterotomy result; a case series study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Feb 14;15:56-58. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.005. eCollection 2017 Mar.

  • Liang J, Church JM. Lateral internal sphincterotomy for surgically recurrent chronic anal fissure. Am J Surg. 2015 Oct;210(4):715-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 27.

  • Wiley M, Day P, Rieger N, Stephens J, Moore J. Open vs. closed lateral internal sphincterotomy for idiopathic fissure-in-ano: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jun;47(6):847-52. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0530-2. Epub 2004 May 6.

  • Gupta V, Rodrigues G, Prabhu R, Ravi C. Open versus closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the management of chronic anal fissures: a prospective randomized study. Asian J Surg. 2014 Oct;37(4):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

  • Alawady M, Emile SH, Abdelnaby M, Elbanna H, Farid M. Posterolateral versus lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1461-1467. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3087-6. Epub 2018 May 19.

  • Mentes BB, Guner MK, Leventoglu S, Akyurek N. Fine-tuning of the extent of lateral internal sphincterotomy: spasm-controlled vs. up to the fissure apex. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jan;51(1):128-33. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9121-3. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

  • Murad-Regadas SM, Fernandes GO, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Pereira Jde J, Regadas Filho FS, Dealcanfreitas ID, Holanda Ede C. How much of the internal sphincter may be divided during lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure in women? Morphologic and functional evaluation after sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):645-51. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827a7416.

  • Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Kusanagi H. Fissurectomy with vertical non-full-thickness sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;23(10):1009-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02087-7. Epub 2019 Sep 24. No abstract available.

  • Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02050307.

  • Boulos PB, Araujo JG. Adequate internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: subcutaneous or open technique? Br J Surg. 1984 May;71(5):360-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710517.

  • Stewart DB Sr, Gaertner W, Glasgow S, Migaly J, Feingold D, Steele SR. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Anal Fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):7-14. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000735. No abstract available.

  • Cross KL, Massey EJ, Fowler AL, Monson JR; ACPGBI. The management of anal fissure: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov;10 Suppl 3:1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01681.x. No abstract available.

  • Brady JT, Althans AR, Neupane R, Dosokey EMG, Jabir MA, Reynolds HL, Steele SR, Stein SL. Treatment for anal fissure: Is there a safe option? Am J Surg. 2017 Oct;214(4):623-628. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

  • Manoharan R, Jacob T, Benjamin S, Kirishnan S. Lateral Anal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissures- A Comparison of Outcomes and Complications under Local Anaesthesia Versus Spinal Anaesthesia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):PC08-PC12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21779.9299. Epub 2017 Jan 1.

  • Garcia-Granero E, Sanahuja A, Garcia-Botello SA, Faiz O, Esclapez P, Espi A, Flor B, Minguez M, Lledo S. The ideal lateral internal sphincterotomy: clinical and endosonographic evaluation following open and closed internal anal sphincterotomy. Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jun;11(5):502-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01645.x. Epub 2008 Jul 15.

  • Garcia-Granero E, Sanahuja A, Garcia-Armengol J, Jimenez E, Esclapez P, Minguez M, Espi A, Lopez F, Lledo S. Anal endosonographic evaluation after closed lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 May;41(5):598-601. doi: 10.1007/BF02235266.

  • Lindsey I, Jones OM, Smilgin-Humphreys MM, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ. Patterns of fecal incontinence after anal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Oct;47(10):1643-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0651-7.

  • Elsebae MM. A study of fecal incontinence in patients with chronic anal fissure: prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. World J Surg. 2007 Oct;31(10):2052-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9177-1.

  • Ribas Y, Hotouras A, Munoz-Duyos A, Murphy J, Chan CL. Sphincterotomy in women with chronic anal fissure? Are we asking for trouble? Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):e404. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000184. No abstract available.

  • Garg P, Garg M, Menon GR. Long-term continence disturbance after lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Mar;15(3):e104-17. doi: 10.1111/codi.12108.

  • Davies I, Dafydd L, Davies L, Beynon J. Long term outcomes after lateral anal sphincterotomy for anal fissure: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Today. 2014 Jun;44(6):1032-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0785-0. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

  • Ghayas N, Younus SM, Mirani AJ, Ghayasuddin M, Qazi A, Suchdev SD, Bakshi SK. FREQUENCY OF POST-OPERATIVE FAECAL INCONTINENCE IN PATIENTS WITH CLOSED AND OPEN INTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTEROTOMY. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015 Oct-Dec;27(4):878-82.

  • Casillas S, Hull TL, Zutshi M, Trzcinski R, Bast JF, Xu M. Incontinence after a lateral internal sphincterotomy: are we underestimating it? Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun;48(6):1193-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0914-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fissure in Ano

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anus DiseasesRectal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ugur Sungurtekin, MD

    Pamukkale University Department Of Surgery,Colorectal Surgery Division

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome Assessor doesn't know the type of the surgery.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor in Anesthesiology and Critical Care

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2020

First Posted

June 11, 2020

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2020

Study Completion

August 1, 2020

Last Updated

June 11, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share