Sungurtekin Technique vs. Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: Currently, the lateral internal sphincterotomy is the treatment of choice for a chronic anal fissure. However, the length of the internal sphincter incision varies, due to lack of standardization. Insufficient length increases the risk of recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To compare a new ultra-modified internal sphincterotomy technique to the closed lateral sphincterotomy for treating chronic anal fissures, based on internal anal sphincter function and postoperative complications. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial (block randomization method) SETTING: Pamukkale University hospital in Denizli-Turkey PARTICIPANTS: 200 patients with chronic anal fissures INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Sungurtekin technique (n = 100; ultra-modified group), or the closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (n = 100; closed-lateral group). Follow-up was 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was chronic anal fissure healing. The secondary outcomes were complications, visual analog scale pain scores, sphincter pressures, and incontinence scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedJune 11, 2020
June 1, 2020
7 years
May 22, 2020
June 10, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Recurrence
It has been reported in the literature that healing was completed in 6-8 weeks in patients undergoing this operation. During this period, it was accepted that the fissure was no longer detected as a visual examination finding and that patient complaints disappeared.
1-24 month
Postoperatif pain
The patients asked to record postoperative pain scores with VAS(Visual Analog Scale)Graded from 0.0 to 10.0. and measured postoperative day 3 .As low as possible this pain score value indicates that the patient is exposed to less pain.
Postopetaive 3th day
Incontinence Rate
Pre and postoperative fecal continence were scored using the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) scores. Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) scores were used to assess the severity of fecal incontinence at baseline, and at 12 months. The scores from 0 indicate perfect continence to a maximum of 20 indicates complete incontinence The CCF FI scale combines loss of flatus, liquid and solid stool, use of a pad and the impact on the quality of life a assess the severity of fecal incontinence.
12th month
Complications
Urinary retansion,ecchymosis,itching,bleeding,abscess,fistula has been accepted as postoperative complications
1-24 month
Study Arms (2)
Sungurtekin Technique
EXPERIMENTALSungurtekin technique was performed through the base of the posterior fissure; thus, no additional incision was necessary in the lithotomy position. The mucosa was dissected along the submucosal plane, starting at the hypertrophic papilla, and extended for 1.5 cm. After identifying both the internal and external sphincters completely, under direct vision, a 0.5-cm section of the bottom part of the internal anal sphincter was measured and marked with a ruler. This section was preserved during the operation in a standard fashion for all patients . Next, the internal sphincter bundle was measured with a sterile scale and a mark was placed at 1 cm towards the proximal end. The internal sphincter bundle was elevated with a right angle clamp, then cut with cautery . The operation was completed with meticulous hemostasis and additional suturing (3/0 absorbable suture) of the proximally dissected mucosal flap underlying the muscularis layer
Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe sphincterotomy was performed through a new incision, guided by the surgeon's finger, as described by Boulos et al Boulos PB, Araujo JG. Adequate internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: subcutaneous or open technique? The British journal of surgery 1984;71:360-2.
Interventions
Sungurtekin technique was performed through the base of the posterior fissure; thus, no additional incision was necessary in the lithotomy position. The mucosa was dissected along the submucosal plane, starting at the hypertrophic papilla, and extended for 1.5 cm, a 0.5-cm section of the bottom part of the internal anal sphincter was measured and marked with a ruler. Next, the internal sphincter bundle was measured with a sterile scale and a mark was placed at 1 cm towards the proximal end. The internal sphincter cut with cautery .
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with CAFs that had failed conservative therapy and required surgical treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have a low resting anal pressure in manometric study (lower than 40 mmHg)
- Recurrent anal fissure
- Fissure location other than the posterior anal canal
- Fissure due to inflammatory bowel or infectious disease
- Acute anal fissure,
- Fissure due to chronic diarrhea or anal stenosis
- Anorectal malignancy
- Patients undergone pelvic radiotherapy
- Pregnancy
- Patients with history of diabetes, neurological disease and spinal cord lesions
- Previous episiotomy history
- Painless fissures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (25)
Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, Cassini D, Bettelli E, Brozzetti S. Total lateral sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 May;19(3):245-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0525-9. Epub 2003 Sep 9.
PMID: 13680282RESULTGandomkar H, Zeinoddini A, Heidari R, Amoli HA. Partial lateral internal sphincterotomy versus combined botulinum toxin A injection and topical diltiazem in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):228-34. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000307.
PMID: 25585082RESULTSalih AM. Chronic anal fissures: Open lateral internal sphincterotomy result; a case series study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Feb 14;15:56-58. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.005. eCollection 2017 Mar.
PMID: 28239456RESULTLiang J, Church JM. Lateral internal sphincterotomy for surgically recurrent chronic anal fissure. Am J Surg. 2015 Oct;210(4):715-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
PMID: 26231724RESULTWiley M, Day P, Rieger N, Stephens J, Moore J. Open vs. closed lateral internal sphincterotomy for idiopathic fissure-in-ano: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jun;47(6):847-52. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0530-2. Epub 2004 May 6.
PMID: 15129311RESULTGupta V, Rodrigues G, Prabhu R, Ravi C. Open versus closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the management of chronic anal fissures: a prospective randomized study. Asian J Surg. 2014 Oct;37(4):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
PMID: 24637183RESULTAlawady M, Emile SH, Abdelnaby M, Elbanna H, Farid M. Posterolateral versus lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1461-1467. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3087-6. Epub 2018 May 19.
PMID: 29779044RESULTMentes BB, Guner MK, Leventoglu S, Akyurek N. Fine-tuning of the extent of lateral internal sphincterotomy: spasm-controlled vs. up to the fissure apex. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jan;51(1):128-33. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9121-3. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
PMID: 18085337RESULTMurad-Regadas SM, Fernandes GO, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Pereira Jde J, Regadas Filho FS, Dealcanfreitas ID, Holanda Ede C. How much of the internal sphincter may be divided during lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure in women? Morphologic and functional evaluation after sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):645-51. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827a7416.
PMID: 23575405RESULTTsunoda A, Takahashi T, Kusanagi H. Fissurectomy with vertical non-full-thickness sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;23(10):1009-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02087-7. Epub 2019 Sep 24. No abstract available.
PMID: 31552509RESULTJorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02050307.
PMID: 8416784RESULTBoulos PB, Araujo JG. Adequate internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: subcutaneous or open technique? Br J Surg. 1984 May;71(5):360-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710517.
PMID: 6722464RESULTStewart DB Sr, Gaertner W, Glasgow S, Migaly J, Feingold D, Steele SR. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Anal Fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):7-14. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000735. No abstract available.
PMID: 27926552RESULTCross KL, Massey EJ, Fowler AL, Monson JR; ACPGBI. The management of anal fissure: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov;10 Suppl 3:1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01681.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 18954306RESULTBrady JT, Althans AR, Neupane R, Dosokey EMG, Jabir MA, Reynolds HL, Steele SR, Stein SL. Treatment for anal fissure: Is there a safe option? Am J Surg. 2017 Oct;214(4):623-628. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
PMID: 28701263RESULTManoharan R, Jacob T, Benjamin S, Kirishnan S. Lateral Anal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissures- A Comparison of Outcomes and Complications under Local Anaesthesia Versus Spinal Anaesthesia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):PC08-PC12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21779.9299. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
PMID: 28274000RESULTGarcia-Granero E, Sanahuja A, Garcia-Botello SA, Faiz O, Esclapez P, Espi A, Flor B, Minguez M, Lledo S. The ideal lateral internal sphincterotomy: clinical and endosonographic evaluation following open and closed internal anal sphincterotomy. Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jun;11(5):502-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01645.x. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
PMID: 18637925RESULTGarcia-Granero E, Sanahuja A, Garcia-Armengol J, Jimenez E, Esclapez P, Minguez M, Espi A, Lopez F, Lledo S. Anal endosonographic evaluation after closed lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 May;41(5):598-601. doi: 10.1007/BF02235266.
PMID: 9593242RESULTLindsey I, Jones OM, Smilgin-Humphreys MM, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ. Patterns of fecal incontinence after anal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Oct;47(10):1643-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0651-7.
PMID: 15540293RESULTElsebae MM. A study of fecal incontinence in patients with chronic anal fissure: prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. World J Surg. 2007 Oct;31(10):2052-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9177-1.
PMID: 17665247RESULTRibas Y, Hotouras A, Munoz-Duyos A, Murphy J, Chan CL. Sphincterotomy in women with chronic anal fissure? Are we asking for trouble? Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):e404. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000184. No abstract available.
PMID: 25101617RESULTGarg P, Garg M, Menon GR. Long-term continence disturbance after lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Mar;15(3):e104-17. doi: 10.1111/codi.12108.
PMID: 23320551RESULTDavies I, Dafydd L, Davies L, Beynon J. Long term outcomes after lateral anal sphincterotomy for anal fissure: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Today. 2014 Jun;44(6):1032-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0785-0. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
PMID: 24241581RESULTGhayas N, Younus SM, Mirani AJ, Ghayasuddin M, Qazi A, Suchdev SD, Bakshi SK. FREQUENCY OF POST-OPERATIVE FAECAL INCONTINENCE IN PATIENTS WITH CLOSED AND OPEN INTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTEROTOMY. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015 Oct-Dec;27(4):878-82.
PMID: 27004344RESULTCasillas S, Hull TL, Zutshi M, Trzcinski R, Bast JF, Xu M. Incontinence after a lateral internal sphincterotomy: are we underestimating it? Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun;48(6):1193-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0914-3.
PMID: 15906136RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ugur Sungurtekin, MD
Pamukkale University Department Of Surgery,Colorectal Surgery Division
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome Assessor doesn't know the type of the surgery.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Anesthesiology and Critical Care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2020
First Posted
June 11, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share