'Rehabilitation for Life'
Effect of Measuring Vital Signs and Coherent Rehabilitation in Primary and Secondary Sectors in Older Adults After Hip Fracture Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
339
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite implementing hospital quality programs after hip fracture surgery older adults often experience a decline in the level of physical function, reduced quality of life; and the mortality and readmission rates are high. Early mobilization is important in order to prevent loss of muscle mass; however to prevent morbidity an early start of strength training is also necessary. Furthermore, the risk of complications, morbidity, and mortality are associated with insufficient management of pain. The project aims to examine the effect of measuring vital signs and consistent rehabilitation in the primary and secondary sectors in older adults after hip fracture surgery. Method/ design: The study is a cluster-randomized stepped wedge study. Participants will be recruited among patients admitted to an orthogeriatric ward who are 65 years of age or older and citizens in one of six municipalities. Participants are also the health professionals in the orthogeriatric ward and the six municipalities. The six municipalities form six clusters, which are randomized, and every three-month one cluster cross from control to intervention. The study compares usual practice (control) to an intervention named 'Rehabilitation of Life'. An intervention best described as an empowerment-oriented cross-sectorial program including vital sign measurement and systematic progressive rehabilitation and combined with convenient access for collaboration among professionals. Primary outcomes: Timed Up and Go (TUG) measured 2 months after the time of operation. The investigators hypothesize that 'Rehabilitation of Life' for older adults with a hip fracture will result in a significant reduced TUG-score in comparison to a practice not offering 'Rehabilitation of Life'. And as the study is organised across two sectors, the Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS) makes a second primary outcome. It is hypothesised that patients in the intervention group will achieve a significantly reduced TUG score compared to usual care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 22, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 9, 2024
CompletedApril 27, 2025
April 1, 2025
2.5 years
June 5, 2020
April 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Timed up and go
Measures functional mobility, as the time in seconds it takes a person to rise from a chair with arms, walk 3 m and return to the chair. A higher scores mean a worse outcome
Two months after the time of operation
Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS)
Measures basic mobility. The score 0-6. Higher scores mean a better outcome
One months after the time of operation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Timed up and go
Three and six months after the time of operation
Barthel-20
2, 3, 6 and 12 months after the time of surgery
Other Outcomes (3)
Eq-5D
2, 3, 6 and 12 months after the time of surgery
Mortality 30 days and 1 year.
Mortality measured after 30 days and one year
Readmission
Readmission measured 30 days after discharge
Study Arms (2)
'Rehabilitation for Life'
EXPERIMENTALVital sign measurement and rehabilitation
Usual care and rehabilitation
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care and rehabilitation provided in primary and secondary sectors
Interventions
An empowerment-oriented cross-sectorial program including vital sign measurement and systematic progressive rehabilitation combined with convenient access for collaboration among professionals.
The care and rehabilitation usual provided to patients after hip fracture surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a hip fracture
- Patients of 65 years of age or older
- Patients admitted to an orthogeriatric ward
- Patient who are citizens in one og three municipalities
You may not qualify if:
- Patients discharged for permanent residence in nursing homes
- Patients who cannot participate in a conversation
- Terminal registered patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kolding Sygehuslead
Study Sites (1)
Inge Bruun
Kolding, Southern Denmark, 6000, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Ipsen JA, Pedersen LT, Viberg B, Norgaard B, Suetta C, Bruun IH. Rehabilitation for life: the effect on physical function of rehabilitation and care in older adults after hip fracture-study protocol for a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial. Trials. 2022 May 7;23(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06321-w.
PMID: 35526010DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Inge Bruun, post doc
The Region of Southern Denmark and University of Southern Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2020
First Posted
June 9, 2020
Study Start
September 22, 2020
Primary Completion
April 9, 2023
Study Completion
February 9, 2024
Last Updated
April 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share