NCT04424186

Brief Summary

Despite implementing hospital quality programs after hip fracture surgery older adults often experience a decline in the level of physical function, reduced quality of life; and the mortality and readmission rates are high. Early mobilization is important in order to prevent loss of muscle mass; however to prevent morbidity an early start of strength training is also necessary. Furthermore, the risk of complications, morbidity, and mortality are associated with insufficient management of pain. The project aims to examine the effect of measuring vital signs and consistent rehabilitation in the primary and secondary sectors in older adults after hip fracture surgery. Method/ design: The study is a cluster-randomized stepped wedge study. Participants will be recruited among patients admitted to an orthogeriatric ward who are 65 years of age or older and citizens in one of six municipalities. Participants are also the health professionals in the orthogeriatric ward and the six municipalities. The six municipalities form six clusters, which are randomized, and every three-month one cluster cross from control to intervention. The study compares usual practice (control) to an intervention named 'Rehabilitation of Life'. An intervention best described as an empowerment-oriented cross-sectorial program including vital sign measurement and systematic progressive rehabilitation and combined with convenient access for collaboration among professionals. Primary outcomes: Timed Up and Go (TUG) measured 2 months after the time of operation. The investigators hypothesize that 'Rehabilitation of Life' for older adults with a hip fracture will result in a significant reduced TUG-score in comparison to a practice not offering 'Rehabilitation of Life'. And as the study is organised across two sectors, the Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS) makes a second primary outcome. It is hypothesised that patients in the intervention group will achieve a significantly reduced TUG score compared to usual care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
339

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 22, 2020

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 9, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 9, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Rehabilitationcross-sectorial cooperationolder

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Timed up and go

    Measures functional mobility, as the time in seconds it takes a person to rise from a chair with arms, walk 3 m and return to the chair. A higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Two months after the time of operation

  • Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS)

    Measures basic mobility. The score 0-6. Higher scores mean a better outcome

    One months after the time of operation

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Timed up and go

    Three and six months after the time of operation

  • Barthel-20

    2, 3, 6 and 12 months after the time of surgery

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Eq-5D

    2, 3, 6 and 12 months after the time of surgery

  • Mortality 30 days and 1 year.

    Mortality measured after 30 days and one year

  • Readmission

    Readmission measured 30 days after discharge

Study Arms (2)

'Rehabilitation for Life'

EXPERIMENTAL

Vital sign measurement and rehabilitation

Other: 'Rehabilitation for Life'

Usual care and rehabilitation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual care and rehabilitation provided in primary and secondary sectors

Other: Usual care and rehabilitation

Interventions

An empowerment-oriented cross-sectorial program including vital sign measurement and systematic progressive rehabilitation combined with convenient access for collaboration among professionals.

'Rehabilitation for Life'

The care and rehabilitation usual provided to patients after hip fracture surgery

Usual care and rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a hip fracture
  • Patients of 65 years of age or older
  • Patients admitted to an orthogeriatric ward
  • Patient who are citizens in one og three municipalities

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients discharged for permanent residence in nursing homes
  • Patients who cannot participate in a conversation
  • Terminal registered patients.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Inge Bruun

Kolding, Southern Denmark, 6000, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ipsen JA, Pedersen LT, Viberg B, Norgaard B, Suetta C, Bruun IH. Rehabilitation for life: the effect on physical function of rehabilitation and care in older adults after hip fracture-study protocol for a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial. Trials. 2022 May 7;23(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06321-w.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hip Fractures

Interventions

Rehabilitation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesHip InjuriesLeg Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Inge Bruun, post doc

    The Region of Southern Denmark and University of Southern Denmark

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: A cluster-randomized stepped wedge study. A design that is initiated with a period without interventions followed by a form of cross-over, in which each cluster systematic cross from control to intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2020

First Posted

June 9, 2020

Study Start

September 22, 2020

Primary Completion

April 9, 2023

Study Completion

February 9, 2024

Last Updated

April 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations