NCT04421157

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of two different exercises in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In total, 28 subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were randomly divided into two groups: Schroth (n = 14) and stabilization group (n = 14). The Schroth group received Schroth exercises in addition to traditional rehabilitation, and the stabilization group received core stabilization in addition to traditional rehabilitation for 10 weeks. The outcome measures were based on Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, spinal mobility, cosmetic trunk deformity, muscle strength, and quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 17, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 28, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 3, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2020

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 30, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

May 12, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 25, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Scoliosis, Exercise

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cobb's angle

    Cobb's angles were measured on standard standing anterior-posterior spine radiograph and recorded as degrees. Cobb angle is considered the gold standard to evaluate the curve magnitude. The Cobb angle is the angle from a posterior-anterior full spine radiographs between the upper endplate of the upper-end vertebra of the largest curve and the lower endplate of the lower end vertebra from the largest curve.

    10 week

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Trunk rotation angles

    10 week

  • Muscle strength

    10 week

  • Spinal mobility

    10 week

  • Cosmetic trunk deformity

    10 week

  • SRS-22 Questionnaire

    10 week

Study Arms (2)

Schroth group

EXPERIMENTAL

The Schroth group received Schroth exercises in addition to traditional rehabilitation.

Other: Schroth Exercises

Stabilization group

EXPERIMENTAL

The stabilization group received core stabilization in addition to traditional rehabilitation.

Other: Core stabilization Exercises

Interventions

The Schroth approach consists of 3D scoliosis-specific exercises based on kinesthetic and sensorimotor principles. The goal of Schroth exercises is to teach patients to consciously maintain the correct posture in daily living activities in order to improve the curve, pain, and self-image. The treatment program consists of scoliotic posture correction and a breathing pattern with the help of proprioceptive and exteroceptive stimulations and mirror control. Traditional exercises program included strengthening back, abdominal, pelvis and shoulder girdle muscles and also muscles in the convex side of the curve, stretching exercises especially for the concave side of the curve, postural training, flexibility exercises for the spine, and breathing exercises. Schroth group received Schroth exercises in addition to traditional rehabilitation for 10 weeks. Patients received 30 sessions for 90 minutes at the clinic for ten-week treatment period.

Also known as: Schroth Method, Scoliosis specific exercises
Schroth group

Each exercise session consisted of a warm-up exercise, core stabilization exercise, and a cool-down exercise. The core stabilization exercise was designed with consideration of local, global muscle stability training, global muscle mobility training,and strengthening training of these core structures was carried out progressively advancing more difficult. Traditional exercises program included strengthening back, abdominal, pelvis and shoulder girdle muscles and also muscles in the convex side of the curve, stretching exercises especially for the concave side of the curve, postural training, flexibility exercises for the spine, and breathing exercises. The Stabilization group received Core stabilization in addition to traditional rehabilitation for 10 weeks. Patients received 30 sessions for 90 minutes at the clinic for ten-week treatment period.

Stabilization group

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Having a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,
  • A Cobb angle of 10 to 30 degrees
  • Having Lenke type 1 curve
  • No other treatment which might affect scoliosis

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-idiopathic scoliosis
  • Prescribed brace
  • Surgical correction history
  • Who were unable to participate in the supervised sessions,or those who refused to follow treatment were excluded.
  • Contraindications to exercise -Accompanying mental problems, neurological- muscular or rheumatic diseases,

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University

Karaman, 70200, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Romano M, Minozzi S, Zaina F, Saltikov JB, Chockalingam N, Kotwicki T, Hennes AM, Negrini S. Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Cochrane systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):E883-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829459f8.

    PMID: 23558442BACKGROUND
  • Shneerson JM, Madgwick R. The effect of physical training on exercise ability in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979 Jun;50(3):303-6. doi: 10.3109/17453677908989771.

    PMID: 474101BACKGROUND
  • Negrini S, Fusco C, Minozzi S, Atanasio S, Zaina F, Romano M. Exercises reduce the progression rate of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of a comprehensive systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):772-85. doi: 10.1080/09638280801889568.

    PMID: 18432435BACKGROUND
  • Schreiber S, Parent EC, Khodayari Moez E, Hedden DM, Hill DL, Moreau M, Lou E, Watkins EM, Southon SC. Schroth Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises Added to the Standard of Care Lead to Better Cobb Angle Outcomes in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis - an Assessor and Statistician Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 29;11(12):e0168746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168746. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 28033399BACKGROUND
  • Schreiber S, Parent EC, Hill DL, Hedden DM, Moreau MJ, Southon SC. Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis perceive positive improvements regardless of change in the Cobb angle - Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month Schroth intervention added to standard care and standard care alone. SOSORT 2018 Award winner. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2695-9.

    PMID: 31286903BACKGROUND
  • Thompson JY, Williamson EM, Williams MA, Heine PJ, Lamb SE; ACTIvATeS Study Group. Effectiveness of scoliosis-specific exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis compared with other non-surgical interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2019 Jun;105(2):214-234. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 27.

    PMID: 30824243BACKGROUND
  • Ceballos Laita L, Tejedor Cubillo C, Mingo Gomez T, Jimenez Del Barrio S. Effects of corrective, therapeutic exercise techniques on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A systematic review. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2018 Aug 1;116(4):e582-e589. doi: 10.5546/aap.2018.eng.e582. English, Spanish.

    PMID: 30016036BACKGROUND
  • Kim G, HwangBo PN. Effects of Schroth and Pilates exercises on the Cobb angle and weight distribution of patients with scoliosis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Mar;28(3):1012-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

    PMID: 27134403BACKGROUND
  • Nault ML, Allard P, Hinse S, Le Blanc R, Caron O, Labelle H, Sadeghi H. Relations between standing stability and body posture parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Sep 1;27(17):1911-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00018.

    PMID: 12221357BACKGROUND
  • Sanders JO, Polly DW Jr, Cats-Baril W, Jones J, Lenke LG, O'Brien MF, Stephens Richards B, Sucato DJ; AIS Section of the Spinal Deformity Study Group. Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 15;28(18):2158-63. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084629.97042.0B.

    PMID: 14501929BACKGROUND
  • Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;17(2):179-84. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000081.

    PMID: 23778766BACKGROUND
  • Alves de Araujo ME, Bezerra da Silva E, Bragade Mello D, Cader SA, Shiguemi Inoue Salgado A, Dantas EH. The effectiveness of the Pilates method: reducing the degree of non-structural scoliosis, and improving flexibility and pain in female college students. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012 Apr;16(2):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.04.002. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

    PMID: 22464116BACKGROUND
  • Martinez-Llorens J, Ramirez M, Colomina MJ, Bago J, Molina A, Caceres E, Gea J. Muscle dysfunction and exercise limitation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Respir J. 2010 Aug;36(2):393-400. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00025509. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

    PMID: 20032022BACKGROUND
  • Gur G, Ayhan C, Yakut Y. The effectiveness of core stabilization exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized controlled trial. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Jun;41(3):303-310. doi: 10.1177/0309364616664151. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

    PMID: 27625122BACKGROUND
  • Ameer MA, Kamel MI, Elhafez YM. A comparison of sagittal spine deformities among elementary school students using spinal mouse device. Work. 2019;64(3):545-550. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193015.

    PMID: 31658087BACKGROUND
  • Livanelioglu A, Kaya F, Nabiyev V, Demirkiran G, Firat T. The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves. Eur Spine J. 2016 Feb;25(2):476-82. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3945-7. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

    PMID: 25900295BACKGROUND
  • Cheshire J, Gardner A, Berryman F, Pynsent P. Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017 Dec 11;12:37. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0144-9. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 29238754BACKGROUND
  • Tsai YT, Leong CP, Huang YC, Kuo SH, Wang HC, Yeh HC, Lau YC. The electromyographic responses of paraspinal muscles during isokinetic exercise in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis with a Cobb's angle less than fifty degrees. Chang Gung Med J. 2010 Sep-Oct;33(5):540-50.

    PMID: 20979705BACKGROUND
  • Lin JJ, Chen WH, Chen PQ, Tsauo JY. Alteration in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 15;35(11):1151-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cd5923.

    PMID: 20421854BACKGROUND
  • Kocaman H, Bek N, Kaya MH, Buyukturan B, Yetis M, Buyukturan O. The effectiveness of two different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single-blind, randomized-controlled trial. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249492. eCollection 2021.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ScoliosisMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal CurvaturesSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesBehavior

Study Officials

  • Hikmet Kocaman, MSc

    Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Assessments were undertaken at baseline, and after the 10 week treatment period for each patient by the investigator, who was blind to the allocation of the participants.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Each patient selected a number in a closed envelope, which was sorted via the 'Research Randomiser' program for the randomisation process, and the patients were separated into the following two groups; Schroth group (n=14) and stabilization group (n=14)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2020

First Posted

June 9, 2020

Study Start

October 17, 2019

Primary Completion

January 28, 2020

Study Completion

March 3, 2020

Last Updated

November 30, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations