Ultrasound After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Advanced Imaging for Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
observational
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study would be to evaluate a group of patients status post post-total shoulder arthroplasty to assess the integrity of the rotator cuff using ultrasound. We believe ultrasonography imaging to be a comparable and efficacious modality to evalute tenotomy healing rates and diagnose rotator cuff failure after total shoulder arthroplasty. In addition, we believe ultrasonography to be a cost-effective modality to asses the rotator cuff after total shoulder arthroplasty. Our population would consist of patients that received total shoulder arthroplasty within the last 5 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 22, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2023
CompletedJuly 22, 2024
July 1, 2024
1.8 years
June 2, 2020
July 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of confirmed healed rotator cuff tear as measured by ultrasound
time of procedure, up to 1 hour
Number of confirmed non-healed tenotomy
time of procedure, up to 1 hour
Number of confirmed rotator cuff tears
time of procedure, up to 1 hour
Study Arms (1)
Post-operative patients who had total shoulder arthroplasty
Patients who have had a total shoulder replacement will be scheduled for an ultrasound at Duke Radiology. An ultrasound will be completed on the shoulder that has been replaced, which takes no more than an hour. This ends all study involvement.
Interventions
Evaluation of post-operative patients who have had total shoulder arthroplasty and will assess the integrity of the rotator cuff using ultrasound.
Eligibility Criteria
Duke patients who have had prior total shoulder arthroplasy surgery within the past 5 years who are 18 years of age or older.
You may qualify if:
- Primary or revision total shoulder arthroplasty with or without subscapularis tenotomy
- Primary or revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty with or without subscapularis tenotomy
- English speaking patients only
- Shoulder arthroplasty within the last 5 years
You may not qualify if:
- Revision shoulder arthroplasty for infection
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- Piedmont Orthopedic Societycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (11)
Armstrong A, Lashgari C, Teefey S, Menendez J, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM. Ultrasound evaluation and clinical correlation of subscapularis repair after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;15(5):541-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.013. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
PMID: 16979047BACKGROUNDDines JS. Editorial Commentary: Rotator Cuff Surgery Planning: Yet Another Reason for Orthopedic Surgeons to Learn to Use Ultrasound.... Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2285-2286. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.019.
PMID: 30077254BACKGROUNDGilat R, Atoun E, Cohen O, Tsvieli O, Rath E, Lakstein D, Levy O. Recurrent rotator cuff tear: is ultrasound imaging reliable? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jul;27(7):1263-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
PMID: 29398398BACKGROUNDHorner NS, de Sa D, Heaven S, Simunovic N, Bedi A, Athwal GS, Ayeni OR. Indications and outcomes of shoulder arthroscopy after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Mar;25(3):510-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
PMID: 26652703BACKGROUNDIannotti JP, Ciccone J, Buss DD, Visotsky JL, Mascha E, Cotman K, Rawool NM. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1305-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02100.
PMID: 15930541BACKGROUNDKarthikeyan S, Rai SB, Parsons H, Drew S, Smith CD, Griffin DR. Ultrasound dimensions of the rotator cuff in young healthy adults. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.012. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
PMID: 24439247BACKGROUNDLevy DM, Abrams GD, Harris JD, Bach BR Jr, Nicholson GP, Romeo AA. Rotator cuff tears after total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):78-84. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.180720.
PMID: 27186060BACKGROUNDNarasimhan R, Shamse K, Nash C, Dhingra D, Kennedy S. Prevalence of subscapularis tears and accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in pre-operative diagnosis. Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):975-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3043-9. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
PMID: 26585865BACKGROUNDOkoroha KR, Fidai MS, Tramer JS, Davis KD, Kolowich PA. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears. Ultrasonography. 2019 Jul;38(3):215-220. doi: 10.14366/usg.18058. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
PMID: 30744304BACKGROUNDOkoroha KR, Mehran N, Duncan J, Washington T, Spiering T, Bey MJ, Van Holsbeeck M, Moutzouros V. Characterization of Rotator Cuff Tears: Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Orthopedics. 2017 Jan 1;40(1):e124-e130. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161013-04. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
PMID: 27755645BACKGROUNDOstrander RV, Klauser JM, Menon S, Hackel JG. Ultrasound and Functional Assessment of Transtendinous Repairs of Partial-Thickness Articular-Sided Rotator Cuff Tears. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Mar 27;5(3):2325967117697375. doi: 10.1177/2325967117697375. eCollection 2017 Mar.
PMID: 28451606BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Klifto, MD
Duke University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2020
First Posted
June 4, 2020
Study Start
May 20, 2021
Primary Completion
March 22, 2023
Study Completion
March 22, 2023
Last Updated
July 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share