NCT04416932

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study would be to evaluate a group of patients status post post-total shoulder arthroplasty to assess the integrity of the rotator cuff using ultrasound. We believe ultrasonography imaging to be a comparable and efficacious modality to evalute tenotomy healing rates and diagnose rotator cuff failure after total shoulder arthroplasty. In addition, we believe ultrasonography to be a cost-effective modality to asses the rotator cuff after total shoulder arthroplasty. Our population would consist of patients that received total shoulder arthroplasty within the last 5 years.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 4, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 20, 2021

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 22, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 22, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

June 2, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of confirmed healed rotator cuff tear as measured by ultrasound

    time of procedure, up to 1 hour

  • Number of confirmed non-healed tenotomy

    time of procedure, up to 1 hour

  • Number of confirmed rotator cuff tears

    time of procedure, up to 1 hour

Study Arms (1)

Post-operative patients who had total shoulder arthroplasty

Patients who have had a total shoulder replacement will be scheduled for an ultrasound at Duke Radiology. An ultrasound will be completed on the shoulder that has been replaced, which takes no more than an hour. This ends all study involvement.

Procedure: Ultasound

Interventions

UltasoundPROCEDURE

Evaluation of post-operative patients who have had total shoulder arthroplasty and will assess the integrity of the rotator cuff using ultrasound.

Post-operative patients who had total shoulder arthroplasty

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Duke patients who have had prior total shoulder arthroplasy surgery within the past 5 years who are 18 years of age or older.

You may qualify if:

  • Primary or revision total shoulder arthroplasty with or without subscapularis tenotomy
  • Primary or revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty with or without subscapularis tenotomy
  • English speaking patients only
  • Shoulder arthroplasty within the last 5 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Revision shoulder arthroplasty for infection
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Armstrong A, Lashgari C, Teefey S, Menendez J, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM. Ultrasound evaluation and clinical correlation of subscapularis repair after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;15(5):541-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.013. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

    PMID: 16979047BACKGROUND
  • Dines JS. Editorial Commentary: Rotator Cuff Surgery Planning: Yet Another Reason for Orthopedic Surgeons to Learn to Use Ultrasound.... Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2285-2286. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.019.

    PMID: 30077254BACKGROUND
  • Gilat R, Atoun E, Cohen O, Tsvieli O, Rath E, Lakstein D, Levy O. Recurrent rotator cuff tear: is ultrasound imaging reliable? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jul;27(7):1263-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

    PMID: 29398398BACKGROUND
  • Horner NS, de Sa D, Heaven S, Simunovic N, Bedi A, Athwal GS, Ayeni OR. Indications and outcomes of shoulder arthroscopy after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Mar;25(3):510-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

    PMID: 26652703BACKGROUND
  • Iannotti JP, Ciccone J, Buss DD, Visotsky JL, Mascha E, Cotman K, Rawool NM. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1305-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02100.

    PMID: 15930541BACKGROUND
  • Karthikeyan S, Rai SB, Parsons H, Drew S, Smith CD, Griffin DR. Ultrasound dimensions of the rotator cuff in young healthy adults. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.012. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

    PMID: 24439247BACKGROUND
  • Levy DM, Abrams GD, Harris JD, Bach BR Jr, Nicholson GP, Romeo AA. Rotator cuff tears after total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):78-84. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.180720.

    PMID: 27186060BACKGROUND
  • Narasimhan R, Shamse K, Nash C, Dhingra D, Kennedy S. Prevalence of subscapularis tears and accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in pre-operative diagnosis. Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):975-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3043-9. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

    PMID: 26585865BACKGROUND
  • Okoroha KR, Fidai MS, Tramer JS, Davis KD, Kolowich PA. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears. Ultrasonography. 2019 Jul;38(3):215-220. doi: 10.14366/usg.18058. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

    PMID: 30744304BACKGROUND
  • Okoroha KR, Mehran N, Duncan J, Washington T, Spiering T, Bey MJ, Van Holsbeeck M, Moutzouros V. Characterization of Rotator Cuff Tears: Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Orthopedics. 2017 Jan 1;40(1):e124-e130. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161013-04. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

    PMID: 27755645BACKGROUND
  • Ostrander RV, Klauser JM, Menon S, Hackel JG. Ultrasound and Functional Assessment of Transtendinous Repairs of Partial-Thickness Articular-Sided Rotator Cuff Tears. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Mar 27;5(3):2325967117697375. doi: 10.1177/2325967117697375. eCollection 2017 Mar.

    PMID: 28451606BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Christopher Klifto, MD

    Duke University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2020

First Posted

June 4, 2020

Study Start

May 20, 2021

Primary Completion

March 22, 2023

Study Completion

March 22, 2023

Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations