Live Birth Rate Between PPOS and GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Anticipated High Ovarian Response
A Randomized Control Trial to Compare the Live Birth Rate Between the Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol and the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Anticipated High Ovarian Response Undergoing IVF
1 other identifier
interventional
784
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Progestin can inhibit the pituitary LH surge during ovarian stimulation and various studies show progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective in blocking the LH surge in IVF. More and more centers in China are using PPOS because this regimen appears simpler and cheaper.A randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF in terms of the live birth rate is urgently needed. Trial objectives: To compare the live birth rate between the PPOS protocol and the antagonist protocol used for ovarian stimulation during IVF Eligible women will be randomised into one of the two groups: Antagonist group : Women will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix or Ganirelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger. PPOS group: Women will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or duphaston 10mg bd daily from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger. There will be no fresh transfer. Only one blastocyst will be allowed to replaced in the first FET and a maximum of two blastocysts will be replaced in the subsequent FET cycles. The primary outcome is the live birth rate of the first frozen-thawed transfer cycle.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jun 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2022
CompletedAugust 30, 2023
March 1, 2023
2.4 years
May 26, 2020
August 28, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
live birth rate
live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer cycle
deliveries ≥22 weeks gestation with heartbeat and breath
Secondary Outcomes (16)
positive serum hCG
2 weeks after FET
clinical pregnancy
6 weeks' gestation
biochemical pregnancy
6 weeks' gestation
implantation rate
6 weeks' gestation
ongoing pregnancy
12 weeks' gestation
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Antagonist group
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix or Ganirelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger.
PPOS group
EXPERIMENTALWomen will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or duphaston 10mg bd daily from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger.
Interventions
oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or duphaston 10mg bd daily from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger
GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix or Ganirelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of women \<43 years at the time of ovarian stimulation for IVF
- The first IVF cycle
- Antral follicle count (AFC) \>15 on day 2-5 of the period
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of a functional ovarian cyst with E2\>100 pg/mL
- Recipient of oocyte donation
- Undergoing preimplantation genetic testing
- Presence of hydrosalpinx or endometrial polyp which is not surgically treated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ShangHai JIAI Genetics&IVF Institute
Shanghai, China
Related Publications (7)
Begueria R, Garcia D, Vassena R, Rodriguez A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.
PMID: 30927417BACKGROUNDYu S, Long H, Chang HY, Liu Y, Gao H, Zhu J, Quan X, Lyu Q, Kuang Y, Ai A. New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex367.
PMID: 29300975BACKGROUNDMassin N. New stimulation regimens: endogenous and exogenous progesterone use to block the LH surge during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):211-220. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw047.
PMID: 28062551BACKGROUNDKuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Wang Y, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Shoham Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 May 5.
PMID: 25956370BACKGROUNDDong J, Wang Y, Chai WR, Hong QQ, Wang NL, Sun LH, Long H, Wang L, Tian H, Lyu QF, Lu XF, Chen QJ, Kuang YP. The pregnancy outcome of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using 4 versus 10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):1048-1055. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14622.
PMID: 28276192BACKGROUNDAlexandru P, Cekic SG, Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Ata B. Progestins versus GnRH analogues for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
PMID: 32327297BACKGROUNDChen ZQ, Ai A, Zhang Y, Li H, Wang JY, Wang L, Ng EHY. A randomized controlled trial to compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer following the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response. Fertil Steril. 2024 Jun;121(6):937-945. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.027. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
PMID: 38272383DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
XIAOXI SUN, PHD
Shanghai JiAi Genetics & IVF Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2020
First Posted
June 4, 2020
Study Start
June 4, 2020
Primary Completion
October 10, 2022
Study Completion
October 10, 2022
Last Updated
August 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will be available when beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- To achieve aims in the approved proposal, researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal will be shared with. Proposals should be sent to lihe198900@163.com.
Individual participant data that underlie the results after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) and study protocol will be shared.