Bubble: A New VR-AI Way of Treatment for Hot Flashes in Women With Breast Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the potential of a unique artificial intelligence-virtual reality intervention called Bubble, to reduce the number and intensity of hot flashes and their accompanying psychological symptoms in women, aged 28-55, with breast cancer. A sample of 37 women with breast cancer were selected to the study. Participants were asked to answer a survey before and after using Bubble. The treatment period was 24 days. The findings are positive and show that the use of Bubble help to reduce several psychological symptoms connected to hot flashes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedJanuary 27, 2022
January 1, 2022
1.1 years
May 15, 2020
January 12, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Demographic and background (disease & treatment-elated) information
A form was used to assess demographic information, including birth date, race, education, marital status, employment status, and household income. Women also were asked to record their height and weight, which was used to calculate body mass index. Routine information regarding date of diagnosis, stage of disease, and types and dates of cancer treatments was obtained from medical records
Through study completion, an average of 1 month
HFRDIS, The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale
The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS;Carpenter, 2001) is a 10-item scale measuring the degree to which hot flashes interfere with nine daily activities; the tenth item measures the degree hot flashes interfere with overall quality of life. The HFRDIS was developed to include daily life activities specific to the impact of hot flashes. Participants rate the degree to which hot flashes have interfered with each item during the previous week using a 0 (do not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) point scale. A total score is computed by summing items. Higher scores indicate higher interference due to hot flashes and thus, greater impact on quality of life.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, before the manipulation
HFRDIS, The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale
The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS;Carpenter, 2001) is a 10-item scale measuring the degree to which hot flashes interfere with nine daily activities; the tenth item measures the degree hot flashes interfere with overall quality of life. The HFRDIS was developed to include daily life activities specific to the impact of hot flashes. Participants rate the degree to which hot flashes have interfered with each item during the previous week using a 0 (do not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) point scale. A total score is computed by summing items. Higher scores indicate higher interference due to hot flashes and thus, greater impact on quality of life.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, after the manipulation
HFRS, The Hot Flash Rating Scale
measures the frequency and intensity of hot flashes and night sweats per day and per week. It also estimates chronicity and average duration of the hot flashes, as well as provides rating on three separate ten-point scales (1/10 being the least and 10/10 being the most) for the amount of distress, the extent to which HFs interfered with daily life and the degree to which HFs were a problem in patients' lives. A higher score indicates more HF per day.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, before the manipulation
HFRS, The Hot Flash Rating Scale
measures the frequency and intensity of hot flashes and night sweats per day and per week. It also estimates chronicity and average duration of the hot flashes, as well as provides rating on three separate ten-point scales (1/10 being the least and 10/10 being the most) for the amount of distress, the extent to which HFs interfered with daily life and the degree to which HFs were a problem in patients' lives. A higher score indicates more HF per day.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, after the manipulation
PSS, The Perceived Stress Scale
a self-reported questionnaire that was designed to measure the degree to which situations in one's life over the past week are appraised as unpredictable, uncontrollable and overwhelming. It posits that people appraise potentially-threatening or challenging events in relation to their available coping resources. Items are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). A higher score indicates a greater degree of perceived stress.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, before the manipulation
PSS, The Perceived Stress Scale
a self-reported questionnaire that was designed to measure the degree to which situations in one's life over the past week are appraised as unpredictable, uncontrollable and overwhelming. It posits that people appraise potentially-threatening or challenging events in relation to their available coping resources. Items are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). A higher score indicates a greater degree of perceived stress.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, after the manipulation
K10, The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale
10-item measure of psychological distress in the past month, which reliably predicts the presence of a current depressive or anxiety disorder at a cut-off score of 17. The K10 is a 10-item questionnaire rated on a five-point Likert-type scale (from "none of the time" = 1 to "all of the time" = 5). A higher score indicates a greater degree of distress.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, before the manipulation
K10, The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale
10-item measure of psychological distress in the past month, which reliably predicts the presence of a current depressive or anxiety disorder at a cut-off score of 17. The K10 is a 10-item questionnaire rated on a five-point Likert-type scale (from "none of the time" = 1 to "all of the time" = 5). A higher score indicates a greater degree of distress.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, after the manipulation
B-IPQ, The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
is designed to provide simple and rapid assessment of illness perceptions, using single items on a scale from 1-10 to assess each item including; perceived consequences, timeline (acute vs chronic), amount of perceived personal control, treatment control, identity (symptoms), concern about the illness, coherence of the illness and emotional representation of the illness.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, before the manipulation
B-IPQ, The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
is designed to provide simple and rapid assessment of illness perceptions, using single items on a scale from 1-10 to assess each item including; perceived consequences, timeline (acute vs chronic), amount of perceived personal control, treatment control, identity (symptoms), concern about the illness, coherence of the illness and emotional representation of the illness.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, after the manipulation
PSQI, The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
a retrospective self-report questionnaire that measures sleep quality over the previous month. Seven clinically derived domains of sleep difficulties (sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications, and daytime dysfunction) are assessed. The PSQI global score allowed discriminating between healthy controls and patients, and between groups of patients affected by different pathologies. Results also indicated that the best cut-off score (differentiating "good" from "bad" sleepers) is 5.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, before the manipulation
PSQI, The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
a retrospective self-report questionnaire that measures sleep quality over the previous month. Seven clinically derived domains of sleep difficulties (sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications, and daytime dysfunction) are assessed. The PSQI global score allowed discriminating between healthy controls and patients, and between groups of patients affected by different pathologies. Results also indicated that the best cut-off score (differentiating "good" from "bad" sleepers) is 5.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, after the manipulation
WHOQOL-BREF, The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale
assesses individuals' perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns. The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100 scale, and as the WHOQOL-100 it includes four domains: physical, psychological, social and environmental QOL and 5-point response scales (5,Very satisfied-1,Very dissatisfied;1,Not at all-5,Extremely; 1,Not at all-5,Completely; and 1,Never-5,Always) and Domain scores are scaled in a positive direction (i.e. higher scores denote higher quality of life).
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, before the manipulation
WHOQOL-BREF, The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale
assesses individuals' perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns. The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100 scale, and as the WHOQOL-100 it includes four domains: physical, psychological, social and environmental QOL and 5-point response scales (5,Very satisfied-1,Very dissatisfied;1,Not at all-5,Extremely; 1,Not at all-5,Completely; and 1,Never-5,Always) and Domain scores are scaled in a positive direction (i.e. higher scores denote higher quality of life).
Through study completion, an average of 1 month, after the manipulation
Study Arms (1)
research group
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Bubble Bubble is a virtual reality (VR) mobile application. Bubble offers a psychological intervention based upon cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) protocols. The bubble mobile application offers the intervention in a virtual reality (VR) coaching environment and in a winter wonderland setting called Frosty. Frosty provides both a virtual reality winter wonderland experience as well as guided meditation. The cold, winter-like experience is designed to help patients calm down and feel cooler.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females between the ages of 18 and 60
- Having an existing diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer
- Receiving standard-of-care chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or estrogen blocking anti-cancer treatment
- The woman reported experiencing hot flashes at least once per day for a duration of at least 7 days prior to the beginning of the study and hot flashes for at least 30 days prior to the beginning of the study
- No chronic migraine headaches, seizure disorders, serious vestibular disorders, or pathological vertigo
- No serious psychiatric disorders
- Not pregnant
- No current substance abuse
- Not participating in other forms of therapy
- Not using medical marijuana.
You may not qualify if:
- \* women aged 28-55 with breast cancer suffering from hot flashes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bar-Ilan University, Israellead
- Hematology and Oncology Specialistscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Bar Ilan University
Ramat Gan, Israel
Related Links
- Andrews, G., \& Slade, T. (2001). Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 494-497.
- Blumel, J. E., Castelo-Branco, C., Binfa, L., Gramegna, G., Tacla, X., Aracena, B., … Sanjuan, A. (2000). Quality of life after the menopause: A population study. Maturitas, 34(1), 17-23.
- Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., \& Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research, 28(2), 193-213
- Fenlon, D. R., Corner, J. L., \& Haviland, J. S. (2008). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Relaxation Training to Reduce Hot Flashes in Women with Primary Breast Cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 35(4), 397-405
- Hardy, C. (2017). The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale: Cutoffs, minimally important differences, and a revised short version. Menopause, 24(8), 869-870.
- Kadakia, K. C., Loprinzi, C. L., \& Barton, D. L. (2012). Hot flashes: The ongoing search for effective interventions. Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, 19(7), 719-721.
- Lee, E.-H. (2012). Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale. Asian Nursing Research, 6(4), 121-127.
- Nilsson, S., Finnström, B., Kokinsky, E., \& Enskär, K. (2009). The use of Virtual Reality for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents in a paediatric oncology unit. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 13(2), 102-109
- Schneider, Susan M., Ellis, M., Coombs, W. T., Shonkwiler, E. L., \& Folsom, L. C. (2003). Virtual Reality Intervention for Older Women with Breast Cancer. CyberPsychology \& Behavior, 6(3), 301-307.
- Schneider, Susan M., \& Hood, L. E. (2007). Virtual Reality: A Distraction Intervention for Chemotherapy. Oncology Nursing Forum, 34(1), 39-46
- Schneider, Susan M., Prince-Paul, M., JoAllen, M., Silverman, P., \& Talaba, D. (2004). Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention for Women Receiving Chemotherapy. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31(1), 81-88.
- Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., \& O'Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial.
- Stearns, V., Ullmer, L., Lopez, J. F., Smith, Y., Isaacs, C., \& Hayes, D. F. (2002). Hot flushes. The Lancet, 360(9348), 1851-1861
- Tatrow, K., \& Montgomery, G. H. (2006). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Techniques for Distress and Pain in Breast Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(1), 17-27
- The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. (1995). Social Science \& Medicine, 41(10), 1403-1409.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior lecturer and head of the Trauma and Stress Research Lab at Bar-Ilan University's Department of Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2020
First Posted
June 4, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 28, 2019
Study Completion
February 28, 2019
Last Updated
January 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01