Risk of Asymptomatic Cerebral Embolism During AF Ablation With AI-HPSD Strategy Versus Standard Settings
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study is to evaluate the risk of asymptomatic cerebral embolism during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) with AI-HPSD strategy versus standard radiofrequency ablation settings, with the diagnosis of asymptomatic cerebral embolism is determined by brain high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Jun 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 13, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedNovember 28, 2023
November 1, 2023
1.2 years
May 26, 2020
November 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The incidence of new asymptomatic cerebral embolic lesions determined by hDWI.
The brain hDWI should be performed within 3 days prior to the ablation procedure to investigate previous cerebral lesions and reevaluated within 24-72 hours post ablation to determine the occurrence of new asymptomatic cerebral embolic lesions. The acute cerebral embolic lesion is typically defined as a new focal hyper-intense area detected on the diffusion-weighted sequence, and a hyper-intense signal intensity in the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence, and meantime confirmed by apparent diffusion coefficient mapping as corresponding area of restricted diffusion to rule out a shine-through artifact.
Within 3 days prior to the ablation;24-72 hours after AF catheter ablation procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Cognitive functional status evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test.
On the 1 day before and 24-72 hours and 3 months after the catheter ablation procedure.
Overall complication rate during catheter ablation and up to 3 months follow up.
3 months after the catheter ablation procedure.
Study Arms (2)
Ablation Index Guided High-Power Short-Duration Group
EXPERIMENTALFor patients assigned to undergo AF ablation with ablation index guided high-power short-duration strategy, point-by-point circumferential pulmonary vein ablation will be performed using the advanced STSF catheter under ablation index guided high power short duration strategy (Radiofrequency energy is set up at a power of 50 W, temperature of 43 °C, contact force of 5-20 gram, and flow rate of 20 mL/min; Target ablation index is set to 500 at the anterior wall and 350 at the posterior wall of left atrium).
Standard Radiofrequency Ablation Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients assigned to undergo AF ablation with standard radiofrequency ablation group, point-by-point circumferential pulmonary vein ablation will be performed using the ST catheter under standard radiofrequency ablation settings (Radiofrequency energy is set up at a power of 30 to 35 W, temperature of 43 °C, contact force of 5-20 gram, and flow rate of 17 to 30 mL/min. Target ablation index is set to 500 at the anterior wall and 350 at the posterior wall of left atrium).
Interventions
Point-by-point circumferential pulmonary vein ablation will be performed using the advanced STSF catheter under ablation index guided high power short duration strategy (Radiofrequency energy is set up at a power of 50 W, temperature of 43 °C, contact force of 5-20 gram, and flow rate of 20 mL/min; Target ablation index is set to 500 at the anterior wall and 350 at the posterior wall of left atrium).
Point-by-point circumferential pulmonary vein ablation will be performed using the ST catheter under standard radiofrequency ablation settings (Radiofrequency energy is set up at a power of 30 to 35 W, temperature of 43 °C, contact force of 5-20 gram, and flow rate of 17 to 30 mL/min. Target ablation index is set to 500 at the anterior wall and 350 at the posterior wall of left atrium).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients≥18 years of age prior to obtaining the written informed consent.
- Patients with electrocardiographically documented, symptomatic atrial fibrillation.
- Patients is scheduled to undergo circumferential pulmonary vein antrum radiofrequency ablation.
- Patient or patient's legal representative is able and willing to give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Moderate to severe valvular heart disease.
- Contraindication for anticoagulation therapy.
- Contraindication for Diffusion-Weighted MRI.
- Ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to the consent date.
- Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months prior to the consent date.
- Prior left atrial appendage occlusion device.
- Prior septal occlusion device.
- Left atrial size greater than 55 mm.
- Conditions that prevent patient's participation in neurocognitive assessment (at physician's discretion).
- Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding or plan a pregnancy during the course of the study.
- Simultaneous participation in another study.
- Unwilling or unable to comply fully with the study procedures and follow-up requirements.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Second Affilliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400010, China
Related Publications (9)
Schmidt B, Szeplaki G, Merkely B, Kautzner J, van Driel V, Bourier F, Kuniss M, Bulava A, Nolker G, Khan M, Lewalter T, Klein N, Wenzel B, Chun JK, Shah D. Silent cerebral lesions and cognitive function after pulmonary vein isolation with an irrigated gold-tip catheter: REDUCE-TE Pilot study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;30(6):877-885. doi: 10.1111/jce.13902. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
PMID: 30848001BACKGROUNDYu Y, Wang X, Li X, Zhou X, Liao S, Yang W, Yu J, Zhang F, Ju W, Chen H, Yang G, Li M, Gu K, Tang L, Xu Y, Chan JY, Kojodjojo P, Cao K, Fan J, Yang B, Chen M. Higher Incidence of Asymptomatic Cerebral Emboli After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Found With High-Resolution Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;13(1):e007548. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007548. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
PMID: 31937118BACKGROUNDProvidencia R, Albenque JP, Boveda S. The unfinished issue of ischaemic stroke and embolic events during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):881. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw027. No abstract available.
PMID: 28340141BACKGROUNDYamane T. Silent Cerebral Embolism After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation - Unresolved Issue or Too Much Concern? Circ J. 2016;80(4):814-5. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0186. Epub 2016 Mar 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 26948985BACKGROUNDKyriakopoulou M, Wielandts JY, Strisciuglio T, El Haddad M, Pooter J, Almorad A, Hilfiker G, Phlips T, Unger P, Lycke M, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Duytschaever M, Knecht S. Evaluation of higher power delivery during RF pulmonary vein isolation using optimized and contiguous lesions. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1091-1098. doi: 10.1111/jce.14438. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
PMID: 32147899BACKGROUNDCastrejon-Castrejon S, Martinez Cossiani M, Ortega Molina M, Escobar C, Froilan Torres C, Gonzalo Bada N, Diaz de la Torre M, Suarez Parga JM, Lopez Sendon JL, Merino JL. Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;57(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00645-5. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
PMID: 31713704BACKGROUNDOkamatsu H, Koyama J, Sakai Y, Negishi K, Hayashi K, Tsurugi T, Tanaka Y, Nakao K, Sakamoto T, Okumura K. High-power application is associated with shorter procedure time and higher rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;30(12):2751-2758. doi: 10.1111/jce.14223. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
PMID: 31600006BACKGROUNDChen S, Schmidt B, Bordignon S, Urbanek L, Tohoku S, Bologna F, Angelkov L, Garvanski I, Tsianakas N, Konstantinou A, Trolese L, Weise F, Perrotta L, Chun KRJ. Ablation index-guided 50 W ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Procedural data, lesion analysis, and initial results from the FAFA AI High Power Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;30(12):2724-2731. doi: 10.1111/jce.14219. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
PMID: 31588620BACKGROUNDChen WJ, Gan CX, Cai YW, Liu YY, Xiao PL, Zou LL, Xiong QS, Qin F, Tao XX, Li R, Du HA, Liu ZZ, Yin YH, Ling ZY. Impact of high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation technique on the incidence of silent cerebral embolism: a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Med. 2023 Nov 23;21(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03180-3.
PMID: 37996906DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2020
First Posted
May 29, 2020
Study Start
June 17, 2020
Primary Completion
September 13, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
November 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share