Retrospective Review of Xen Gel Stent Implantation With Open vs. Closed Conjunctiva Approach
2 other identifiers
observational
137
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To measure surgical success of open vs closed conjunctiva with Xen implantation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2017
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 26, 2020
CompletedMay 25, 2023
August 1, 2020
2.8 years
May 24, 2020
May 24, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
re-intervention rate
This will be assessed as the proportion of patients that will need fibrosis relief by stent re-implantation
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in intraocular pressure
1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Interventions
Ab-interno or Ab-Externa Xen with closed or open conjunctiva.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients presenting to the two institutions with elevated IOP and required surgery to lower IOP.
You may qualify if:
- Require surgery for uncontrolled glaucoma
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- New York Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Univeristy
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Related Publications (2)
Panarelli JF, Yan DB, Francis B, Craven ER. XEN Gel Stent Open Conjunctiva Technique: A Practical Approach Paper. Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2538-2549. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01278-1. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
PMID: 32200534BACKGROUNDDo A, McGlumphy E, Shukla A, Dangda S, Schuman JS, Boland MV, Yohannan J, Panarelli JF, Craven ER. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Open Versus Closed Conjunctiva Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021 Jul-Aug;4(4):343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
PMID: 33321200DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2020
First Posted
May 28, 2020
Study Start
November 19, 2017
Primary Completion
August 26, 2020
Study Completion
August 26, 2020
Last Updated
May 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
De-identified internal use data.