"Increasing Physical Activity in Canadian Adults Affected by COVID-19 Social Distancing Restrictions: A Feasibility Trial of an Online Intervention"
COVID-19
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Internet-based health promotion programs have the potential to reach more individuals than in person interventions, without overtaxing healthcare resources. Having a high quality, user-centered web-based program can help maximize user engagement and adherence. Thus, the primary objective of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility, time, cost, and acceptability of a web-based physical activity behavior change program with Canadian Adults who have had to start practising/following the social distancing guidelines due to the COVID-19 situation. We will also be examining changes other behavioral indicators related to PA as a secondary outcome measure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2021
CompletedOctober 21, 2021
October 1, 2021
1.3 years
May 21, 2020
October 19, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Recruitment rate (monthly)
For the full scale RCT, we are looking for a 1 day per week or 30 min MVPA change which equates to an approximate effect size of d = .35. This equates to roughly 65 per group (130 for a two group trial). If we recruit for 2 years in the large trial (assuming a six month time period for each person in the intervention) we need to be recruiting at least 6 per month.
4 months
Participant retention
Number of participants who complete both baseline and end of study (6 week) measures. A 80-100% retention rate is indicative of a strong trial (Jackson \& Waters, 2005).
6 weeks
Participant intervention satisfaction/evaluation
For satisfaction ratings, mean and standard deviations will be calculated for the quantitative satisfaction and evaluation questionnaire. Given that scores of 1 (ex. not helpful, did not use the tools) and 2 (ex. Somewhat helpful, used a little bit of the tools) indicated levels of dissatisfaction, and 3 (ex. Quite helpful, used a bit of the tools) and 4 (ex. Extremely helpful, used a lot of the tools) indicated some sort of satisfaction, a mean score of ≥ 2.5 will be deemed acceptable for recommendation for a full RCT.
6 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in self-reported physical activity from baseline to 6 weeks
6 Weeks
Change in physical activity beliefs, attitudes, barriers, and motivation from baseline to 6 weeks.
Baseline - 6 weeks
Change in physical activity behaviour regulation from baseline to 6 weeks.
Baseline - 6 weeks
Change in physical activity habits from baseline to 6 weeks
Baseline - 6 weeks
Change in physical activity identity from baseline to 6 weeks
Baseline - 6 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONNo Intervention: Control Group This group will complete baseline and final questionnaires (online). At the end of the study this group will have the option to receive access to the other group's materials (online platform) if they wish, for the 6 week period following the study.
Intervention
OTHERParticipants will complete a baseline questionnaire, and receive access to the our online platform for 6 weeks. Completing the online platform is designed to encourage participants to engage in physical activity. At 3 weeks, a check-in session will occur over the phone. At 6 weeks the participant will be contacted to complete the final questionnaire, and do a wrap up interview. The end-of-trial qualitative interview will evaluate participant satisfaction and feasibility of the intervention. For this reason a lab employee unaffiliated with this study will complete these in person interviews.
Interventions
The website has 10 lessons that the participant will gain access to on a bi-weekly basis. Lesson titles are as follows: Lesson 1 - Benefits of Physical Activity on Chronic Disease Lesson 2 - Mental benefits of Physical Activities Lesson 3 - Increasing Self Confidence for Physical Activities Lesson 4 - Learning about your Emotions Lesson 5 - Building Social Support Lesson 6 - Building Physical Activity Opportunity Lesson 7 - Goal Setting and Planning Lesson 8 - Self Monitoring Lesson 9 - Habit Lesson 10 - Identity
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Potential participants will be included if they have:
- started practising social distancing due to the current COVID-19 guidelines
- are currently not meeting the physical activity (PA) guidelines (less than 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous aerobic activity)
- participants must have access to the internet at home, and have a smart phone or home computer that can support the eHealth application we are using.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants will be excluded from the project if:
- they do not have access to the Internet,
- are unable to speak/read English,
- are engaging in moderate-to vigorous PA (MVPA) sufficient to meet the PA Guidelines,
- have an existing chronic medical condition potentially making them at risk of injury or ill health from increasing their physical activity (this will be assessed using the GAQ. Screening completed formally over the phone, and participants will give their consent online)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Behavioural Medicine Lab, University of Victoria
Victoria, British Columbia, V8P-5C2, Canada
University of Victoria
Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 2Y2, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Jackson N, Waters E; Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in Health Promotion and Public Health Taskforce. Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions. Health Promot Int. 2005 Dec;20(4):367-74. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai022. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
PMID: 16169885BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Ryan Rhodes
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2020
First Posted
May 22, 2020
Study Start
May 20, 2020
Primary Completion
August 30, 2021
Study Completion
August 30, 2021
Last Updated
October 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share