Leader and Team Performance During PPH Simulated Scenario
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is the progress of the performance of the leader and of the team for the postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) before and after four high-fidelity standardized scenarios of severe PPH (1500 mL blood loss) due to refractory uterine atony with anesthesia trainees.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2020
CompletedMay 26, 2020
May 1, 2020
4 months
May 18, 2020
May 21, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
leader behavior
The behavioral scores (Likert Scale)) were assigned by two independent observers, experts in communication and evaluation in simulation, who reviewed the videos of each simulation.
15 minutes
team performance
A study investigator, expert in both PPH and simulation debriefing, not involved in the simulation, observed each scenario to record and check the team's technical skills according to the established 23 PPH key task.
15 minutes
leader self assessment
After each simulation all the leaders were asked to complete a survey related to the leader and the team behaviors. Questions required a yes/no answer or an answer based on an ordinal scale (1=poor, 5=excellent).
15 minutes
team self assessment
After each simulation all participants were asked to complete a survey related to the leader and the team behaviors. Questions required a yes/no answer or an answer based on an ordinal scale (1=poor, 5=excellent).
15 minutes
Interventions
A study investigator, expert in both PPH and simulation debriefing, not involved in the simulation, observed each scenario to record and check the team's technical skills according to the established 23 PPH key tasks. The behavioral scores were assigned by two independent observers, experts in communication and evaluation in simulation, who reviewed the videos of each simulation each simulation all participants were asked to complete a survey related to the leader and the team behaviors. Questions required a yes/no answer or an answer based on an ordinal scale (1=poor, 5=excellent).
Eligibility Criteria
anesthesia trainees
You may qualify if:
- anesthesia trainee
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Capogna Giorgiolead
Study Sites (1)
Eesoa Simulation Center
Roma, 00151, Italy
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Giorgio Capogna, MD
European e-Learning School in Obstetric Anesthesia
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, EESOA Simulation Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2020
First Posted
May 21, 2020
Study Start
January 10, 2020
Primary Completion
April 30, 2020
Study Completion
April 30, 2020
Last Updated
May 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share