Prospective RCT Lidocaine & Levobupivacaine on Block Dynamics After Subparaneural Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Levobupivacaine on Block Dynamics After a Subparaneural Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa is indicated for foot or ankle surgery, and the introduction of ultrasound guidance (USG) has improved the ease and accuracy of the performance of this block. Recent studies proved that subparaneural injection is associated with faster block onset, higher block success rate, and prolonged block duration suggesting subparaneural compartment of the sciatic nerve is a desirable site for local anaesthetic injection. Data from an ongoing trial in the investigator's institution comparing the block dynamics of subparaneural injection of 30ml 0.5% levobupivacaine (Chirocaine) above and below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve at popliteal fossa has also shown that the time to 'readiness for surgery' was faster when the injection was performed below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve. Lidocaine (Xylocaine) has a better pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profile than levobupivacaine and is also widely used as local anaesthetic agent in clinical practice. Since there is no data comparing the block dynamics of lidocaine and levobupivacaine, this study aims to study and compare the block dynamics of lidocaine and levobupivacaine when given as a subparaneural injection below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa. In this study, the investigator hypothesizes that the use of lidocaine as the sole agent for this block will fasten the time to 'readiness for surgery' as compared to levobupivacaine when given as a subparaneural injection below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2023
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
April 13, 2025
April 1, 2025
3 years
May 13, 2020
April 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete sensory blockade
Proportion of patients achieving complete sensory blockade (sensory score=0) at 30 minutes; Sensory score: VRS 0-100; 0=no sensation, 100=normal sensation
assessed within the first 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Complete motor blockade
assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Time to readiness for surgery
assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Time to complete sensory and motor block
assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Paresthesia
Intraoperative (during the period of undergoing the nerve block)
complications
after the nerve block till the end of surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Levobupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.5% levobupivacaine (0.5% Chirocaine) 30ml (150mg) will be injected once for regional anaesthesia before surgery
Xylocaine + adrenaline
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2% Xylocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 30ml (450mg) will be injected once for regional anaesthesia before surgery
Interventions
The plane where the sciatic nerve bifurcates will at first be identified by utlrasound. 22-gauge insulated nerve block needle will be inserted in the short axis (out-of-plane) of the ultrasound transducer, and advanced toward the cleavage between the common peroneal nerve and the tibial nerve, which is the easiest location for needle access into subparaneural compartment.Once the needle tip enters the subparaneural compartment 2-3 ml of normal saline will be injected (hydro-distension) to create a halo around both the common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve distally and the sciatic nerve proximally. The needle is then redirected to place its tip into the paraneural sheath of the common peroneal and tibial nerve through the same skin puncture and 15ml of study drug will be injected at each site (total 30ml).
The plane where the sciatic nerve bifurcates will at first be identified by utlrasound. 22-gauge insulated nerve block needle will be inserted in the short axis (out-of-plane) of the ultrasound transducer, and advanced toward the cleavage between the common peroneal nerve and the tibial nerve, which is the easiest location for needle access into subparaneural compartment.Once the needle tip enters the subparaneural compartment 2-3 ml of normal saline will be injected (hydro-distension) to create a halo around both the common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve distally and the sciatic nerve proximally. The needle is then redirected to place its tip into the paraneural sheath of the common peroneal and tibial nerve through the same skin puncture and 15ml of study drug will be injected at each site (total 30ml).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- adult and scheduled to undergo elective forefoot surgery under regional anaesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- patient refusal
- ASA physical status \> III
- pregnancy
- neuromuscular disorder
- prior surgery in the popliteal fossa
- coagulopathy
- allergy to local anaesthetic drugs
- skin infection at the site of needle insertion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manoj K Karmakar, MD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- 1. Patients will be blinded to the treatment arm in which he/she is allocated to. 2. Anesthesiologist performing the block will receive identical syringes with equal volume of local anaesthetics, prepared by a nurse/ pharmacist who is not involved in the study. 3. Anaesthesiologist performing the block will be blinded. 4. Outcome assessor assessing the outcomes will be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2020
First Posted
May 21, 2020
Study Start
September 20, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share