Hyperbaric Prilocaine Compared With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Cervical Cerclage?
PRILOCC
Does Subarachnoid Administration of Hyperbaric Prilocaine Produce an Improved Recovery From Anaesthesia When Compared With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine When Used to Make Cervical Cerclage Easier in Pregnant Women at Risk of Pre-term Loss?
2 other identifiers
interventional
135
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients that have a "cervical stitch" (cervical cerclage) require an anaesthetic. The most common choice is a spinal block. This is an injection in the back that makes the lower half of the body become temporarily numb and weak. The key aims when choosing which type of anaesthetic are safety for mother and baby, comfort during and after the procedure as well as patient convenience and satisfaction. There are two commonly available choices for the drug used in spinal anaesthesia, bupivacaine and prilocaine. Both have a long history of being safe and effective. One difference observed in studies of these drugs used for spinal anaesthetics in other surgeries is that prilocaine is shorter-acting and it, therefore, takes less time for the return of full strength and sensation of the lower body. This means patients are able to leave hospital sooner and are less likely to need a urinary catheter. The investigators want to see if these benefits can apply to patients having a cervical stitch too, by comparing the recovery of patients having a spinal anaesthetic with one of these two local anaesthetic medications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2021
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 27, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2024
CompletedMarch 18, 2024
March 1, 2024
3 years
May 14, 2020
March 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time from SAB to Bromage score of I
Difference in time taken for regression of lower limb block between the two groups
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Time from SAB until loss of cold sensation to ethyl chloride spray at tenth thoracic dermatomal level (T10)
30 minutes
Time from SAB until motor block Bromage IV
30 minutes
Determine uppermost level of sensory block
20 minutes
Degree of motor block
20 minutes
Maximum intraoperative Numerical Rating Score (NRS) [0-10]
1 hour
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Prilocaine (Intervention) Group
EXPERIMENTALSubarachnoid block (SAB) with 40 mg (2 ml) of hyperbaric 20 mg/ml prilocaine and 15 mcg (0.3 ml) fentanyl (50 mcg/ml)
Bupivacaine (Control) Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubarachnoid block (SAB) with 10 mg (2 ml) of hyperbaric 5 mg/ml bupivacaine and 15 mcg (0.3 ml) fentanyl (50 mcg/ml)
Interventions
2 ml hyperbaric prilocaine
2 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy (ASA score 2 or 3) pregnant women presenting for elective cervical cerclage under SAB.
- Age \> 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to read or understand the patient information sheet (PIS)
- Age \< 18 years
- Unable or unwilling to consent to participation
- non-elective procedure
- serious co-morbidities (ASA score 4 or above)
- any contraindication to SAB, e.g. local or generalised infection, active central nervous system disease, coagulation disorders or anti-coagulant medication
- any history of allergic reaction to any of the medications in the protocol
- concomitant use of class III anti-arrhythmics (sulfonamides, antimalarials, sodium nitroprussate, nitroglycerin, other local anaesthetics)
- any contraindication to the use of bupivacaine or prilocaine as listed in the SmPCs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE1 7RT, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Desire Onwochei, MBBS
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2020
First Posted
May 19, 2020
Study Start
August 27, 2021
Primary Completion
August 31, 2024
Study Completion
August 31, 2024
Last Updated
March 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share