Pediatric Burn Treatment Using Tilapia Skin as a Xenograft for Superficial-Partial Thickness Wounds
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Nile tilapia skin as a xenograft for the treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2020
CompletedMay 18, 2020
May 1, 2020
12 months
April 30, 2020
May 12, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Complete burn wound healing
The number of days to complete burn wound healing (≥95% reepithelialization), calculated via clinical judgment from the consultant.
Day 11
Assessment of pain via the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).
The pain evaluation via the FPS-R was performed by the patient himself or herself if aged 5 years or more, or by their caregiver in patients under 5 years of age. The scale consists of six faces, presented horizontally, that depict different degrees of pain, from "no pain" to "most pain possible". A numerical value from 0 to 10 is assigned to each face.
Day 11
Assessment of pain via CONFORT-B scale.
The pain evaluation via CONFORT-B Scale was performed by the physician responsible and assessed the pain based in a behavioral that consisted in six factors: alertness, calmness/agitation, respiratory response (or crying), physical movement, muscle tone, and facial tension.Each factor was scored with values ranging between 1 and 5, generating scores between 6 and 30 points.
Day 11
Assessment of pain via FLACCr scale.
The pain evaluation via FLACCr scale was performed by the physician responsible and answered five evaluation categories based on behavioral parameters with combined scores ranging from zero to ten (classified the scores as follows: zero to three (mild pain); four to six (moderate pain) and seven to ten (severe pain).
Day 11
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of dressings performed.
Day 11
Total amount of anesthetics and analgesics required throughout the treatment
Day 11
Evaluation of burn improvement via the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I).
Day 3, day 5, day 7, day 9 and day 11
Evaluation of burn severity via the Clinical Global Impression Scale- Severity (CGI-S).
Day 1, day 3, day 5, day 7, day 9 and day 11
Study Arms (2)
Test - Tilapia Skin
EXPERIMENTALAfter cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, the tilapia skin was applied and covered with gauze and bandage.
Control - Silver sulfadiazine
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, a thin layer of silver sulfadiazine cream 1% was applied and covered with gauze and band
Interventions
After cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, the tilapia skin was applied and covered with gauze and bandage. These dressings were changed only if the tilapia skin did not adhere properly to the wound bed
After cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, a thin layer of silver sulfadiazine cream 1% was applied and covered with gauze and bandage. In these patients, the dressings were changed daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children between the ages of 2 and 12 years admitted to our institution with superficial partial thickness burns less than 72 hours from the thermal injury
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were excluded for a burn greater than 15% total body surface area (TBSA);
- Presence of a previous treatment for the current burn;
- Presence of a chemical or electrical burn;
- Presence of other significant diseases that could impact the volunteer's participation in the study;
- Presence of hypersensitivity to materials used in the study or to related compounds.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Burn Treatment Center, Dr. José Frota Institute
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60025-061, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Plastic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2020
First Posted
May 18, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 12, 2018
Study Completion
April 12, 2018
Last Updated
May 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05