NCT04391582

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Nile tilapia skin as a xenograft for the treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds in children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 12, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 12, 2018

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2020

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 18, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

April 30, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 12, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

BurnsWounds and InjuriesBiocompatible MaterialsNile TilapiaOreochromis niloticus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Complete burn wound healing

    The number of days to complete burn wound healing (≥95% reepithelialization), calculated via clinical judgment from the consultant.

    Day 11

  • Assessment of pain via the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).

    The pain evaluation via the FPS-R was performed by the patient himself or herself if aged 5 years or more, or by their caregiver in patients under 5 years of age. The scale consists of six faces, presented horizontally, that depict different degrees of pain, from "no pain" to "most pain possible". A numerical value from 0 to 10 is assigned to each face.

    Day 11

  • Assessment of pain via CONFORT-B scale.

    The pain evaluation via CONFORT-B Scale was performed by the physician responsible and assessed the pain based in a behavioral that consisted in six factors: alertness, calmness/agitation, respiratory response (or crying), physical movement, muscle tone, and facial tension.Each factor was scored with values ranging between 1 and 5, generating scores between 6 and 30 points.

    Day 11

  • Assessment of pain via FLACCr scale.

    The pain evaluation via FLACCr scale was performed by the physician responsible and answered five evaluation categories based on behavioral parameters with combined scores ranging from zero to ten (classified the scores as follows: zero to three (mild pain); four to six (moderate pain) and seven to ten (severe pain).

    Day 11

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of dressings performed.

    Day 11

  • Total amount of anesthetics and analgesics required throughout the treatment

    Day 11

  • Evaluation of burn improvement via the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I).

    Day 3, day 5, day 7, day 9 and day 11

  • Evaluation of burn severity via the Clinical Global Impression Scale- Severity (CGI-S).

    Day 1, day 3, day 5, day 7, day 9 and day 11

Study Arms (2)

Test - Tilapia Skin

EXPERIMENTAL

After cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, the tilapia skin was applied and covered with gauze and bandage.

Other: Tilapia skin

Control - Silver sulfadiazine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, a thin layer of silver sulfadiazine cream 1% was applied and covered with gauze and band

Drug: silver sulfadiazine cream 1%

Interventions

After cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, the tilapia skin was applied and covered with gauze and bandage. These dressings were changed only if the tilapia skin did not adhere properly to the wound bed

Test - Tilapia Skin

After cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, a thin layer of silver sulfadiazine cream 1% was applied and covered with gauze and bandage. In these patients, the dressings were changed daily

Control - Silver sulfadiazine

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children between the ages of 2 and 12 years admitted to our institution with superficial partial thickness burns less than 72 hours from the thermal injury

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients were excluded for a burn greater than 15% total body surface area (TBSA);
  • Presence of a previous treatment for the current burn;
  • Presence of a chemical or electrical burn;
  • Presence of other significant diseases that could impact the volunteer's participation in the study;
  • Presence of hypersensitivity to materials used in the study or to related compounds.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Burn Treatment Center, Dr. José Frota Institute

Fortaleza, Ceará, 60025-061, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

BurnsWounds and Injuries

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This was an open-label, monocentric, randomized phase II clinical trial.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Plastic Surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2020

First Posted

May 18, 2020

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

April 12, 2018

Study Completion

April 12, 2018

Last Updated

May 18, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Locations