NCT04390893

Brief Summary

Compare the accuracy of two methods of ultrasound and air leakage test in positioning laryngeal mask. Validate the relationship between ultrasound scores, air leak levels, and bronchoscopic classification in positioning laryngeal mask

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
104

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 13, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 18, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 6, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 13, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

ultrasoundair leakage testbronchofiberscope

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Ultrasound scoring system

    Anesthesiologist who are familiar with ultrasound would scan three planes of neck

    during procedure (after laryngeal mask's placement)

  • Air leakage test grading system

    Anesthesiologist would auscultate the degree of leakage

    during procedure (after laryngeal mask's placement)

  • Fiberoptic scoring system

    Anesthesiologist would confirm the position of LMA by fiberscope

    procedure (after ultrasound examination or leakage test)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Complications related to LMA (laryngeal mask airway )

    24 hours after surgery

Study Arms (2)

ultrasound positioning group

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: ultrasound

leak test positioning group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Diagnostic Test: air leakage test

Interventions

Anesthesiologist would scan three planes of the neck to position the LMA

ultrasound positioning group
air leakage testDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Anesthesiologist would use air leakage test to position the LMA

leak test positioning group

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients selected for this study must meet all of the following criterion:
  • Age is between 17 to 65 years old;
  • ASA (Amecican Society of Anesthesiology ) scores I-II;
  • Actual weight is between 30 to 100 kilogram;
  • Patients undergo selective supine operations under general anesthesia (laryngeal mask);
  • Patients agree to participate in our study and sign Informed Consent Form

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients cannot participate in this study if they have any of the following conditions:
  • Airway stenosis, history of airway masses etc, whicn may cause obstruction to ventilation;
  • Swelling of the neck caused by huge mass in the neck and history of neck surgery etc, which doesn't contribute to ultrasound observation;
  • Stomach fullness, intestinal obstruction, gastroesophageal reflux disease etc, which may cause reflux aspiration.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518035, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Song K, Yi J, Liu W, Huang S, Huang Y. Confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement by ultrasound examination: a pilot study. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:638-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

  • Perez-Herrero MA, de la Varga O, Flores M, Sanchez-Ruano J, Otero M, Buisan F. Descriptive study of ultrasound images of the upper airway obtained after insertion of laryngeal mask. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 Oct;65(8):434-440. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 30. English, Spanish.

  • Osman A, Sum KM. Role of upper airway ultrasound in airway management. J Intensive Care. 2016 Aug 15;4:52. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0174-z. eCollection 2016.

  • Zhou ZF, Xia CZ, Wu M, Yu LN, Yan GZ, Ren QS, Hu CX, Yan M. Comparison of three methods for the confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 May;41(5):1212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

  • Kim J, Kim JY, Kim WO, Kil HK. An ultrasound evaluation of laryngeal mask airway position in pediatric patients: an observational study. Anesth Analg. 2015 Feb;120(2):427-32. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000551.

  • Ghai B, Ram J, Makkar JK, Wig J. Fiber-optic assessment of LMA position in children: a randomized crossover comparison of two techniques. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Nov;21(11):1142-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03632.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Ultrasonography

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Central Study Contacts

Li Xiong, master

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Anesthesiology Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2020

First Posted

May 18, 2020

Study Start

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion

July 31, 2021

Study Completion

October 31, 2021

Last Updated

April 6, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations