Efficacy of High and Low Intensity Percutaneous Electrolysis for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Muscle pain is frequently attributed to myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in which myofascial trigger points (MTrP) are a characteristic feature. Dry needling is a frequent clinical practice to manage MPS but few evidence is published about percutaneous electrolysis effects for the treatment of MPS. This is a randomized clinical trial with 3 parallel groups: 1) High intensity-short time percutaneous electrolysis; 2) Low intensity-long time percutaneous electrolysis; 3) dry needling control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2020
CompletedMay 15, 2020
April 1, 2020
1 month
April 30, 2020
May 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pressure Pain Threshold (Trigger Point)
Algometry (Wagner analogical algometer)
7 days
Pressure Pain Threshold (Patellar Tendon)
Algometry (Wagner analogical algometer)
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Subjective pain perception
7 days
Study Arms (3)
High-Intensity short time percutaneous electrolysis
EXPERIMENTALApplication of a 0,66uA galvanic current in the active TrP through a needle during 10 seconds. During the 20 seconds left necessary to blind the patient and the examiner, the needle was inside but with no electrical current
Low-Intensity long time percutaneous electrolysis
EXPERIMENTALApplication of a 0,22uA galvanic current in the active TrP through a needle during 30 seconds
Dry needling
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne acupuncture needle was placed in the active TrP to produce a local twitch response during 30 seconds
Interventions
Needle emplacement with a galvanic electrical current
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Athletes with knee pain
- Presence of at least one active Trigger point
You may not qualify if:
- Farmacologic treatment
- Surgery or traumas
- Skin alterations or infections
- Prior 6 weeks DN nor PT treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Camilo Jose Cela University
Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, 28692, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, PT, Msc
Camilo Jose Cela University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alberto Sanchez-Mayoral-Martín, PT
Free professional practice
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2020
First Posted
May 15, 2020
Study Start
February 17, 2020
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
April 27, 2020
Last Updated
May 15, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share