NCT04387370

Brief Summary

Stump safety is provided by different methods in laparoscopic appendectomy. Stapler use, binding with endoloop and nonabsorbable clip are the most common methods. Although the stapler is safe, it creates a significant cost increase. In connecting with the endoloop, the learning curve and surgical time are longer. Nonabsorbable clip application which has been used recently; Urethra was also used in appendectomy after its safety has been proven by large studies to close cystic ducts and vascular structures. Its advantages such as low cost, no need for a learning curve and shortening the surgical time have increased the frequency of use.In this prospective observational study; It will be aimed to investigate the effects of stump closure methods applied in laparoscopic appendectomy on short-term clinical results. In addition, the factors that determine the surgeon's stump closure method and cost results will be tried to be determined.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2020

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 18, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 19, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

April 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Laparoscopic appendectomyHem-o-lok clipstump closure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Is it safe to close the appendix stump with a single hem-o-lok clip?

    Complications of patients using single and double clips will be compared according to Clavien-Dindo scoring system.

    one year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The effect of single and double hem-o-lok clips on cost in laparoscopic appendectomy

    one week

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsPatients over 18 years old
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients operated on for acute appendicitis

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosis of acute appendicitis
  • Performing laparoscopic surgery
  • Patients with an ASA score of I-II-III

You may not qualify if:

  • Appendectomies with the patient's refusal to participate in the study
  • Open surgery
  • Primary pathology without appendicitis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dicle University Medical of School, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Diyarbakır, 21280, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Aday U, Cetin E, Kafadar MT, Oguz A, Bahadir MV, Ulger BV, Gedik E, Girgin S, Yilmaz M. Single versus double Hem-o-lok clips to secure the apendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized multicentric clinical trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Mar 8;409(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03281-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Appendicitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intraabdominal InfectionsInfectionsGastroenteritisGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesCecal DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Abdullah Oğuz, MD

    Dicle University Medical of School

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ulaş Aday, MD

    Dicle University Medical of School

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mehmet veysi Bahadır, MD

    Dicle University Medical of School

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
30 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2020

First Posted

May 13, 2020

Study Start

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion

January 31, 2023

Study Completion

April 18, 2023

Last Updated

April 19, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Since there are no plans yet, planning will be done later.

Locations