MELD as an Adjunct for SEEG Trajectories
MAST
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Epilepsy is a disorder of the brain which is associated with disabling seizures and affects 100,000 people under 25. Many children with epilepsy also have a learning disability or problems with development. Although better outcomes occur in children who are successfully treated early for their epilepsy, 25% continue to have seizures despite best medical treatment. One potential treatment is a neurosurgical operation to remove parts of the brain that generate seizures. A proportion of these children have electrodes inserted into their brains as part of their clinical assessment, termed stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), to help localise these regions. Subsequent surgery is not always successful - up to 40% of children will have ongoing seizures 5 years after surgery. The planning of where to place SEEG electrodes relies on experts (neurologists, neurophysiologists and neurosurgeons) using information from multiple sources, which are used to generate hypotheses about where the seizures are coming from. The main components are the patient's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and video-electroencephalography (EEG) recordings during seizures. Using this information, between 5-18 electrodes are implanted and the recordings continue for 5-15 days in hospital. A focus is identified in about 75% of cases which means that the focus is sometimes missed. This prospective single arm pilot study aims to assess a new automated lesion detection algorithm, MELD, designed to identify focal cortical dysplasias (the most common pathology associated with focal epilepsy in children) on otherwise 'normal' MRI scans. The investigators will assess whether MELD can be used to improve the targeting of abnormalities in children undergoing SEEG recording at Great Ormond Street Hospital
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2022
CompletedNovember 19, 2021
November 1, 2021
1.8 years
April 21, 2020
November 18, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Additional contacts in neurophysiologically defined seizure onset zone
For each patient, the investigators will assess whether any of the additional electrodes (added as part of the trial to record from detected lesions) were in the neurophysiologically (SEEG) defined seizure onset zone. This will be a dichotomous yes/no outcome for each patient.
Baseline (During inpatient admission)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Pre-implantation confidence
Baseline (During inpatient admission)
Number of electrodes added
Baseline (During inpatient admission)
Number of electrodes added
Baseline (During inpatient admission)
Was a MELD-identified lesion part of the SOZ (and if so how many?)
Baseline (During inpatient admission)
Would the SOZ have been identified without MELD?
Baseline (During inpatient admission)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
MELD-assisted SEEG trajectory planning
EXPERIMENTALFollowing routine clinical planning, the MELD algorithm will be run on the enrolled patient's scans. Up to 3 extra electrodes may be used to target lesion clusters identified by the algorithm such that the investigators will record from the top 3 clusters, with the aim of improving the rate of identification of a focal seizure onset zone in patients undergoing SEEG.
Interventions
During the routine SEEG planning meetings, the planning of SEEG trajectories, including the number and location of electrodes, will follow the usual clinical pathway and be planned according to the expertise of the attending neurosurgeon, neurophysiologist and neurologist at the multidisciplinary team meeting. Once the trajectories have been planned, anonymised scans for each patient (linked to them via a unique study ID) will be run through the MELD classifier and the top 3 MELD identified lesion clusters will be considered for further implantation. These top 3 MELD classifier identified clusters will then be merged with the existing clinical plan to assess if each of the clusters are already being sampled by an SEEG electrode. If there is already an electrode in each lesion, no adjustments will be made. If there are clusters that are not being recorded from, and it is technically possible, extra electrodes (up to 3) will be added to record from these additional locations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 3-18 undergoing SEEG recording as part of the investigation of their epilepsy at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children.
You may not qualify if:
- Tuberous sclerosis
- Prior resective epilepsy surgery
- Insufficient imaging datasets for the algorithm
- Lack of informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2020
First Posted
May 11, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
May 30, 2022
Last Updated
November 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
As is current good scientific practice, heavily anonymised matrices of processed data and the processing code will be made available as part of any publication. These datasets will be fully anonymised and in abstract space (ie will not contain primary MRI scan images or electrode locations) and will rather be matrices that will in no way be relatable to the patient. They will definitely not contain any patient identifiable information and will not be able to be back-processed to get identifiable information.