NCT04380571

Brief Summary

Fecal incontinence is one of the most psychological frustrating problems. It occurs in children due to many causes. There is a wide range of non-invasive therapeutic approaches like Kegel exercise, Biofeedback, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation. However, up till now, there are no established guidelines for treatment. the objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the early effect of Biofeedback therapy versus bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPNS) as non-invasive methods in the treatment of functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) in children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
93

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 4, 2018

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 27, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 8, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 8, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Fecal incontinenceBiofeedbackTranscutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulationChildern

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Incontinence score using St' Mark's (Vaiszey)

    Questionnaire ranging from zero (indicating complete continence) to 24 (indicating total incontinence).

    3 months after intervention

  • incontinence score using St' Mark's (Vaiszey)

    Questionnaire ranging from zero (indicating complete continence) to 24 (indicating total incontinence).

    6 months after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Resting pressure (mm hg)

    3 months after intervention

  • Resting pressure (mm hg)

    6 months after intervention

  • Squeeze pressure (mm hg)

    3 months after intervention

  • Squeeze pressure (mm hg)

    6 months after intervention

  • First sensation (volume of the balloon by cm water)

    3 months after intervention

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Biofeedback

EXPERIMENTAL

Biofeedback therapy in addition to the conventional measures done in the control Group. It was performed in the same position used for baseline manometry. The used protocol included strength and sensory training, twice weekly for 3 months. Strength training was performed by a double-lumen rectal PVC balloon clothed catheter (MMS U-72210).

Device: Biofeedback

Electrical Stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Bilateral (TPTNS); was applied with an electrode above the medial malleolus A second electrode) was applied just below the same malleolus. Electrical stimulation with a low-frequency current (10 Hz), and adjustable intensity. The procedure was done for 20-30 minutes, three times per week for 3 months together with the conventional maneuvers applied in the control group.

Device: Electrical stimulation

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

were managed by conventional methods through Kegal exercises and dietetic regulation where they had received bulky food including vegetables, fruits bran and cereals. Fast foods, spicy drinks and caffeine should be limited in child's diet. Local hygiene and zinc oxide application to the perianal skin were advised to prevent skin excoriation.

Other: Traditional treatment

Interventions

Biofeedback therapy in addition to the conventional measures done in the control Group. It was performed in the same position used for baseline manometry. The used protocol included strength and sensory training, twice weekly for 3 months. Strength training was performed by a double-lumen rectal PVC balloon clothed catheter (MMS U-72210).

Biofeedback

A positive auto adhesive electrode was applied above the medial malleolus over the S3 dermatome. A second negative electrode was applied just below the same malleolus. Both electrodes were linked to an electrical stimulation device ( EMS physio Ltd, OX129 F, England) with a low frequency current (10 Hz), and adjustable intensity.

Also known as: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation
Electrical Stimulation

Conventional treatment through Kegal exercises and dietetic regulation where they had received bulky food including vegetables, fruits bran and cereals. Fast foods, spicy drinks and caffeine should be limited in child's diet. Local hygiene and zinc oxide application to the perianal skin were advised to prevent skin excoriation.

Also known as: Exercises
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • FecaI incontinence
  • Normal defecation frequency,
  • Normal bowel habits and
  • Normal stool consistency

You may not qualify if:

  • Children who are not cooperative,
  • Children with traumatic sphincter injury,
  • Children with fecal impaction,
  • Children with spinal diseases causing incontinence,
  • Children with anorectal malformation,

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Banha University

Banhā, Banha, 13518, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fecal IncontinenceEncopresis

Interventions

Biofeedback, PsychologyElectric StimulationExercise

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rectal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorElimination DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mind-Body TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesFeedback, PsychologicalPhysical StimulationInvestigative TechniquesMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Emad M Abdelrhman, PhD

    Benha University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The current prospective randomized controlled study included 93 children with FNRFI who were randomly divided and allocated into 3 groups. were managed by conventional methods through Kegal exercises and dietetic regulation where they had received bulky food including vegetables, fruits bran and cereals. Fast foods, spicy drinks and caffeine should be limited in child's diet. Local hygiene and zinc oxide application to the perianal skin were advised to prevent skin excoriation.Biofeedback group treated by biofeedback therapy in addition to traditional treatment, while the third group is the electrical stimulation group received bilateral (TPTNS) in addition to the traditional treatment. Initial manometric findings including resting pressure (mm hg), squeeze pressure (mm hg), 1st sensation (cm water), 1st urge (cm water), and intense urge (cm water) were recorded and repeated after 3 and 6 months together with incontinence score recorded in using St' Mark's (Varizey).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2020

First Posted

May 8, 2020

Study Start

March 4, 2018

Primary Completion

December 27, 2018

Study Completion

February 28, 2019

Last Updated

May 8, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

After Publication, the investigators would like to share the data with authors interested in this topic

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
After Publication
Access Criteria
Not available now

Locations