NCT04379921

Brief Summary

One of the primary goals of spine surgery is to reduce pain and increase mobility to improve patients' quality of life. Currently, there is no established method for surgeons to objectively track their patients' mobilization postoperatively. This study is the first prospective trial utilizing the Apple Watch to objectively track patients before and after elective spine surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the ability of patients to track their own activity and discuss with their surgeon objective mobilization goals will not only help patients achieve empowerment in their own care but also improve their overall satisfaction and self-reported outcomes after spine surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
255

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 8, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2020

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 19, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

April 30, 2020

Results QC Date

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Spine SurgeryApple WatchObjective Tracking of Spine Surgery Outcomes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (16)

  • Correlation Between Objective Patient Measures (Steps, Distance Travelled, From Apple Watch) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (SF-36, EQ-5D, PROMIS, NDI, ODI)

    Steps and distance (meters) collected by Apple Watch were averaged across the outcome measure time frame. Survey scores were collected at the end of the outcome measure time frame. * Short Form-36 (SF-36): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * EuroQOL-5 Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Scores range from 41 to 78.3. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Neck Disability Index (NDI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    2-6 weeks pre-operatively

  • Correlation Between Objective Patient Measures (Steps, Distance Travelled, From Apple Watch) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (SF-36, EQ-5D, PROMIS, NDI, ODI)

    Steps and distance (meters) collected by Apple Watch were averaged across the outcome measure time frame. Survey scores were collected at the end of the outcome measure time frame. * Short Form-36 (SF-36): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * EuroQOL-5 Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Scores range from 41 to 78.3. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Neck Disability Index (NDI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    4-6 weeks post-operatively

  • Correlation Between Objective Patient Measures (Steps, Distance Travelled, From Apple Watch) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (SF-36, EQ-5D, PROMIS, NDI, ODI)

    Steps and distance (meters) collected by Apple Watch were averaged across the outcome measure time frame. Survey scores were collected at the end of the outcome measure time frame. * Short Form-36 (SF-36): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * EuroQOL-5 Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Scores range from 41 to 78.3. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Neck Disability Index (NDI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    6 weeks-3 months post-operatively

  • Correlation Between Objective Patient Measures (Steps, Distance Travelled, From Apple Watch) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (SF-36, EQ-5D, PROMIS, NDI, ODI)

    Steps and distance (meters) collected by Apple Watch were averaged across the outcome measure time frame. Survey scores were collected at the end of the outcome measure time frame. * Short Form-36 (SF-36): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * EuroQOL-5 Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Scores range from 41 to 78.3. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Neck Disability Index (NDI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    3-6 months post-operatively

  • Correlation Between Objective Patient Measures (Steps, Distance Travelled, From Apple Watch) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (SF-36, EQ-5D, PROMIS, NDI, ODI)

    Steps and distance (meters) collected by Apple Watch were averaged across the outcome measure time frame. Survey scores were collected at the end of the outcome measure time frame. * Short Form-36 (SF-36): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * EuroQOL-5 Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health outcomes. * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Scores range from 41 to 78.3. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Neck Disability Index (NDI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    6-12 months post-operatively

  • Change in Objective Outcome Measures: Number of Steps After Surgery

    Steps per day collected by Apple Watch were averaged across the respective outcome measure time frame. Change was calculated as the post-baseline value minus the baseline value (which was normalized to zero).

    2-6 weeks pre-operatively; 4-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, 3-6 months, and 6-12 months post-operatively

  • Change in Objective Outcome Measures: Distance Traveled (Meters) After Surgery

    Meters per day collected by Apple Watch were averaged across the respective outcome measure time frame. Change was calculated as the post-baseline value minus the baseline value (which was normalized to zero).

    2-6 weeks pre-operatively; 4-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, 3-6 months, and 6-12 months post-operatively

  • Patient Compliance With Wearing Apple Watch - Wear Time

    Average hours wear time per day across the outcome measure time frame.

    2-6 weeks pre-operatively

  • Patient Compliance With Wearing Apple Watch - Wear Time

    Average hours wear time per day across the outcome measure time frame.

    4-6 weeks post-operatively

  • Patient Compliance With Wearing Apple Watch - Wear Time

    Average hours wear time per day across the outcome measure time frame.

    6 weeks-3 months post-operatively

  • Patient Compliance With Wearing Apple Watch - Wear Time

    Average hours wear time per day across the outcome measure time frame.

    3-6 months post-operatively

  • Patient Compliance With Wearing Apple Watch - Wear Time

    Average hours wear time per day across the outcome measure time frame.

    6-12 months post-operatively

  • Patient Satisfaction With Their Spine Care

    Reported as the number of participants, by response category.

    6 weeks post-operatively

  • Patient Satisfaction With Their Spine Care

    Reported as the number of participants, by response category.

    3 months post-operatively

  • Patient Satisfaction With Their Spine Care

    Reported as the number of participants, by response category.

    6 months post-operatively

  • Patient Satisfaction With Their Spine Care

    Reported as the number of participants, by response category.

    12 months post-operatively

Study Arms (2)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Participants will receive standard care.

Apple Watch and App

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive standard care, and an Apple Watch to record activity through the App.

Device: Apple Watch and App

Interventions

Participants in the Apple Watch and App arm will receive an Apple Watch and download an App (NeuroCoach). The Apple Watch and App are used for this study to record patient's mobility information (e.g., step counts, heart rate, stairs climbed, distance traveled) as well as provide an additional platform for patients to complete questionnaires.

Apple Watch and App

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English-speaking.
  • Undergoing elective spine surgery by attending physicians at Stanford University.
  • Own iPhone

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with spine trauma, tumors, or infection.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stanford University Hospital

Palo Alto, California, 94305, United States

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Bernstein DN, Brodell D, Li Y, Rubery PT, Mesfin A. Impact of the Economic Downturn on Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in the United States: A National Trend Analysis, 2003 to 2013. Global Spine J. 2017 May;7(3):213-219. doi: 10.1177/2192568217694151. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

    PMID: 28660102BACKGROUND
  • Davis H. Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979-1990. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 15;19(10):1117-23; discussion 1123-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199405001-00003.

    PMID: 8059266BACKGROUND
  • O'Lynnger TM, Zuckerman SL, Morone PJ, Dewan MC, Vasquez-Castellanos RA, Cheng JS. Trends for Spine Surgery for the Elderly: Implications for Access to Healthcare in North America. Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S136-41. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000945.

    PMID: 26378351BACKGROUND
  • Parker SL, Chotai S, Devin CJ, Tetreault L, Mroz TE, Brodke DS, Fehlings MG, McGirt MJ. Bending the Cost Curve-Establishing Value in Spine Surgery. Neurosurgery. 2017 Mar 1;80(3S):S61-S69. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw081.

    PMID: 28350948BACKGROUND
  • Epstein NE. A review article on the benefits of early mobilization following spinal surgery and other medical/surgical procedures. Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Apr 16;5(Suppl 3):S66-73. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.130674. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 24843814BACKGROUND
  • Guzman JZ, Cutler HS, Connolly J, Skovrlj B, Mroz TE, Riew KD, Cho SK. Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(5):429-37. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001211.

    PMID: 26571179BACKGROUND
  • Lu TC, Fu CM, Ma MH, Fang CC, Turner AM. Healthcare Applications of Smart Watches. A Systematic Review. Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Sep 14;7(3):850-69. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-03-R-0042.

    PMID: 27623763BACKGROUND
  • Reeder B, David A. Health at hand: A systematic review of smart watch uses for health and wellness. J Biomed Inform. 2016 Oct;63:269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

    PMID: 27612974BACKGROUND
  • Henriksen A, Haugen Mikalsen M, Woldaregay AZ, Muzny M, Hartvigsen G, Hopstock LA, Grimsgaard S. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 22;20(3):e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9157.

    PMID: 29567635BACKGROUND
  • Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Maharaj M, Rao PJ. Physical Activity Measured with Accelerometer and Self-Rated Disability in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Study. Global Spine J. 2016 Aug;6(5):459-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1565259. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

    PMID: 27433430BACKGROUND
  • Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Long-Term Objective Physical Activity Measurements using a Wireless Accelerometer Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery. Asian Spine J. 2016 Apr;10(2):366-9. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.366. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

    PMID: 27114781BACKGROUND
  • Breteler MJ, Janssen JH, Spiering W, Kalkman CJ, van Solinge WW, Dohmen DA. Measuring Free-Living Physical Activity With Three Commercially Available Activity Monitors for Telemonitoring Purposes: Validation Study. JMIR Form Res. 2019 Apr 24;3(2):e11489. doi: 10.2196/11489.

    PMID: 31017587BACKGROUND
  • Veerabhadrappa P, Moran MD, Renninger MD, Rhudy MB, Dreisbach SB, Gift KM. Tracking Steps on Apple Watch at Different Walking Speeds. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):795-796. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4332-y.

    PMID: 29633143BACKGROUND
  • Xie J, Wen D, Liang L, Jia Y, Gao L, Lei J. Evaluating the Validity of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Fitness Tracking Under Various Physical Activities: Comparative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 12;6(4):e94. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9754.

    PMID: 29650506BACKGROUND
  • Maldaner N, Tang M, Fatemi P, Leung C, Desai A, Tomkins-Lane C, Zygourakis C. Standardizing Physical Activity Monitoring in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Disorders. Neurosurgery. 2024 Apr 1;94(4):788-796. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002755. Epub 2023 Nov 13.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal DiseasesSpinal Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Corinna Zygourakis, MD
Organization
Stanford University

Study Officials

  • Corinna Zygourakis, MD

    Department of Neurosurgery at Stanford University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2020

First Posted

May 8, 2020

Study Start

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion

November 30, 2024

Study Completion

November 30, 2024

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Results First Posted

December 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations