PRF and Bone Graft in Endodontic Surgeries
'A Comparison of Platelet Rich Fibrin & Mineralised Freezed Dried Bone Allograft to Radiographically Evaluate Healing Post Endodontic Surgery'- an In-vivo Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the radiographic healing in patients undergoing apical surgery, using Freeze dried mineralized bone allograft and Platelet-rich Fibrin. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate radiographic healing after periapical surgery using Freeze dried mineralized bone allograft. To evaluate radiographic healing after periapical surgery using Platelet rich Fibrin. To compare the radiographic healing after periapical surgery using Freeze dried mineralized bone allograft and Platelet rich Fibrin. Method: Patients were selected(according to the inclusion criteria) and randomly allocated to PRF and Bone Graft groups.Following apicoectomy PRF gel and FDBA graft were prepared and placed in the osseous defect followed by placement of PRF membrane for graft stabilization and flap closure. Radiographic follow up was done at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months for evaluation of healing using Molven Criteria.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jan 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 24, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2020
CompletedMay 26, 2020
May 1, 2020
1.8 years
May 4, 2020
May 21, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in radiographic healing of periapical tissue after Apicoectomy
Two endodontists extraneous to the present study evaluated the radiographs post intervention and scored the healing according to Molven's scoring criteria for radiographic healing where 0 is representative of unsatisfactory healing and 3- complete healing
Change from Baseline radiographic score at 1 month
Change in radiographic healing of periapical tissue after Apicoectomy
Two endodontists extraneous to the present study evaluated the radiographs post intervention and scored the healing according to Molven's scoring criteria for radiographic healing where 0 is representative of unsatisfactory healing and 3- complete healing
Change from Baseline radiographic score at 3 months
Change in radiographic healing of periapical tissue after Apicoectomy
Two endodontists extraneous to the present study evaluated the radiographs post intervention and scored the healing according to Molven's scoring criteria for radiographic healing where 0 is representative of unsatisfactory healing and 3- complete healing
Change from Baseline radiographic score at 6 months
Change in radiographic healing of periapical tissue after Apicoectomy
Two endodontists extraneous to the present study evaluated the radiographs post intervention and scored the healing according to Molven's scoring criteria for radiographic healing where 0 is representative of unsatisfactory healing and 3- complete healing
Change from Baseline radiographic score at 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Platelet Rich Fibrin group(PRF)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFollowing apicoectomy PRF gel was prepared and placed in the osseous defect followed by placement of PRF membrane
Freezed Dried Bone Allograft group(FDBA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFollowing apicoectomy FDBA graft were prepared and placed in the osseous defect followed by placement of PRF membrane
Interventions
regeneration, restoration or reconstitution of the lost periapical tissues of the tooth by using regenerative therapies that utilize growth factors and barrier membranes.
regeneration, restoration or reconstitution of the lost periapical tissues of the tooth by using regenerative therapies that utilize growth factors and barrier membranes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult teeth with failed conventional endodontic therapy and a need for periapical root end surgery.
- Teeth with bony defect confined to periapical area.
- Adult individuals presenting a tooth with persisting periapical radiolucency.
- Adult individuals presenting a tooth with persistent fistula.
- Adult individuals presenting a tooth with persisting symptoms after orthograde re-treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with severe systemic disorder (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes, immunologic diseases, malignancy), thrombocytopenia or insufficient compliance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Madhur Garg
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 227105, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Madhur Garg
Saraswati Dental College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2020
First Posted
May 6, 2020
Study Start
January 24, 2018
Primary Completion
November 6, 2019
Study Completion
December 9, 2019
Last Updated
May 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share