Individualized Assessment and Treatment for TMD
TMD3c
2 other identifiers
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Temporomandibular/orofacial pain disorders (TMD) are a group of painful conditions with multiple determinants.This proposal has two main goals: 1) to test a highly individualized, adaptive treatment for TMD that has potential to be more effective than other psychosocial treatments; and 2) to discover the mechanisms by which psychosocial treatments work in chronic pain. TMD patients (N=160) will be randomized to receive standard care (STD) + an individualized assessment and treatment program (IATP) or to standard care + conventional cognitive-behavioral treatment (STD+CBT). It is expected that the STD+IATP treatment will yield lower pain, depression and interference scores over time than STD+CBT, and that changes in coping ability will mediate the treatment effects on outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
April 14, 2026
April 1, 2026
6.2 years
May 1, 2020
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in pain from baseline as measured by the 11-point Characteristic Pain Intensity Index at each follow-up point
Characteristic Pain Intensity will be calculated by averaging the ratings of current pain, average pain, and worst pain in the past week from the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS; Von Korff et al., 1992). Each item is scored from 0 -10.
Baseline and at the follow-up points 7 weeks (posttreatment), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Change in interference with activities from Baseline as measured at all follow-up points by the 10-item Interference scale from the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI; Kerns, Turk, & Rudy, 1985).
The MPI is a widely used, validated self-report inventory assessing various areas of impact by chronic pain. The Interference scale iconsists of 10 itmes assessing various areas of life that may have been affected or changed by chronic pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 6 (No change to Extreme Change).
Baseline and at the follow-up points: 7 weeks (posttreatment), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Change in Depressive Symptoms from baseline as measured by the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale Revised (CESD-R) at each follow-up point
CESD-R is a 20-item scale assessing depressive symptoms. It was developed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies (Radlof, 1977), and has shown high reliability and validity. The 20 items describe behaviors or feelings characteristic of depression that people may have. Respondents are instructed to indicate the extent they experience each item on a scale from Rarely to Most of the Time. The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicting mroe severe depressive symptomatology.
Baseline and at the follow-up points 7 weeks (posttreatment), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in pain coping ability from baseline will be measured at each follow-up point using the Brief Pain Coping Inventory (BCPI; McCracken et al., 2005).
Baseline and at the follow-up points 7 weeks (posttreatment), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Change in pain self-efficacy from baseline as measured using the Facial Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (Brister, Turner, Aaron, & Mancl, 2006) at each follow-up point.
Baseline and at the follow-up points: 7 weeks (posttreatment), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Change in pain catastrophizing from baseline using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS; Sullivan et al., 1995) at each follow-up point
Baseline and at the follow-up points: 7 weeks (posttreatment), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Participant rating of improvement as measured at each follow-up by the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC; Hurst & Bolton, 2004).
Follow-up points: 7 weeks (posttreatment), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
STD+CBT
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard conservative dental orofacial pain care + cognitive-behavioral coping skills treatment
STD+IATP
EXPERIMENTALStandard conservative dental orofacial pain care + Individualized Assessment and Treatment Program; a highly individualized coping skills training procedure.
Interventions
Cognitive-behavioral coping skills training
Standard conservative dental care for orofacial pain
Experience-sampling based cognitive behavioral coping skills assessment and training
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Jaw pain \> 3 mo; \> 3/10 on pain scale
- Positive Axis I diagnosis on the Diagnostic Criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD), with or without disc displacement
- Positive on \> 1 of:
- Any myalgia diagnosis
- Any myofascial diagnosis
- Arthralgia
- TMD-related Headache
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of fluency in English
- Previous invasive surgery for TMD, not including arthrography or arthrocentesis
- Extensive anatomical destruction or deterioration of the TM joint
- Diagnosed as having pain of neuropathic or odontogenic origin
- Carrying a diagnosis of psychosis
- Taking narcotic pain medication
- Any comorbid condition necessitating use of an intraoral appliance (e.g., obstructive sleep apnea)
- Pregnancy (excluded due to prescription of NSAIDs)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UConn Health
Farmington, Connecticut, 06030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark D Litt, PhD
UConn Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Neither patient nor therapists can be blinded to treatment condition. The outcomes assessors and the investigators will be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2020
First Posted
May 6, 2020
Study Start
February 3, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
April 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be available once all data collection is completed and the primary article related to this study is published. Data will remain available until further notice.
- Access Criteria
- Requestors must be credentialed investigators, with active institutional affiliation, or students in active degree programs
De-identified data will be made available to other researchers upon request to the Principal Investigator once all data collection is completed and the primary article related to this study is published.