The Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Using Equine Xenograft and a Collagenated Porcine Cortical Lamina
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to clinically, radiographically and histologically evaluate the lateral bone augmentation of the soft porcine cortical lamina (OsteoBiol®) using equine-derived bone particles (OsteoBiol®)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 4, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 12, 2020
CompletedOctober 12, 2020
September 1, 2020
1.8 years
April 28, 2020
May 17, 2020
September 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Width Augmentation at 0 mm
Width difference measured at the top of the crest (0 mm) at the site of implant placement, measured in mm over superimposition of pre-operative (baseline) Cone Beam Computed Tomography and postoperative (at 6 months) Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). The value measured at 6 months minus the value measured at baseline = width difference measured at top of the crest (0 mm).
Six months after the regeneration procedure
Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Width Augmentation at 2 mm
Width difference measured at 2 mm of the top of the crest at the site of implant placement, measured in mm over superimposition of pre-operative (baseline) Cone Beam Computed Tomography and postoperative (at 6 months) Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). The value measured at 6 months minus the value measured at baseline = width difference measured at 2 mm of the top of the crest.
Six months after the regeneration procedure
Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Width Augmentation at 4 mm
Width difference measured at 4 mm of the top of the crest at the site of implant placement, measured in mm over superimposition of pre-operative (baseline) Cone Beam Computed Tomography and postoperative (at 6 months) Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). The value measured at 6 months minus the value measured at baseline = width difference measured at 4 mm of the top of the crest.
Six months after the regeneration procedure
Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Width Augmentation at 6 mm
Width difference measured at 6 mm of the top of the crest at the site of implant placement, measured in mm over superimposition of pre-operative (baseline) Cone Beam Computed Tomography and postoperative (at 6 months) Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). The value measured at 6 months minus the value measured at baseline = width difference measured at 6 mm of the top of the crest.
Six months after the regeneration procedure
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of Implants Placed at 6 Months From the Regeneration Procedure
Six months after the regeneration procedure
Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Height Augmentation in mm Measured Buccally
Six months after the regeneration procedure
Bone Percentage Superficially
Six months after the regeneration procedure
Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Height Augmentation in mm Measured Medially
Six months after the regeneration procedure
Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Height Augmentation in mm Measured Lingually
Six months after the regeneration procedure
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Study population
EXPERIMENTALFifteen patients (1 male, 14 females) aged between 27 and 64 years old
Interventions
The xenograft used in this study was the Gen-Os® by OsteoBiol; as described by the manufacturer, it is a carbonated nanocrystal bone mineral and collagen of natural heterologous origin, obtained by the treatment of cortical bone tissue of equine origins. Its granulometry ranges between 0.25 to 1 mm and it is described as being slightly radiopaque. The soft lamina (OsteoBiol®) used is a 35x35mm medium curved membrane of porcine origins. Its clinical indications as described by the fabricator: a co-adjuvant for the reconstruction or the partial or complete recovery of lost bone portions, fillers of non-infected, non-sclerotic and well blood bedewed bone defects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- systematically healthy
- good oral hygiene (FMPS and FMBS \<20%).
- having ridges with deficiencies in width (\<4 mm, Cawood and Howell class IV) which did not allow correct implant placement.
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant and lactating women,
- patients suffering from a systematic disease
- patients on bisphosphonates
- smokers (\>10 cigarettes/day)
- patients needing vertical augmentations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sarah Khalil
Beirut, 1200, Lebanon
Related Publications (3)
Rossi R, Rancitelli D, Poli PP, Rasia Dal Polo M, Nannmark U, Maiorana C. The use of a collagenated porcine cortical lamina in the reconstruction of alveolar ridge defects. A clinical and histological study. Minerva Stomatol. 2016 Oct;65(5):257-68.
PMID: 27580650BACKGROUNDDeepika-Penmetsa SL, Thomas R, Baron TK, Shah R, Mehta DS. Cortical lamina technique: A therapeutic approach for lateral ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jan 1;9(1):e21-e26. doi: 10.4317/jced.53008. eCollection 2017 Jan.
PMID: 28149458BACKGROUNDWachtel H, Fickl S, Hinze M, Bolz W, Thalmair T. The bone lamina technique: a novel approach for lateral ridge augmentation--a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):491-7. doi: 10.11607/prd.1248.
PMID: 23820709BACKGROUND
Limitations and Caveats
Technical problems with histomorphometric measurements: the distinction between pre-existent and newly formed bone was not possible in all the histological cuts
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Sarah Khalil
- Organization
- Saint Joseph University
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carole Chakar, PhD
Saint-Joseph University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2020
First Posted
May 6, 2020
Study Start
April 4, 2017
Primary Completion
January 31, 2019
Study Completion
January 31, 2019
Last Updated
October 12, 2020
Results First Posted
October 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- As soon as the study is published (summer 2020)
- Access Criteria
- Publication in a scientific journal
All IPD that underlie results in a publication