NCT04375462

Brief Summary

Individuals with cancer causing an intestinal or stomach obstruction often require gastric drainage to prevent symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and to prevent aspiration. This is often achieved by a nasogastric (NG) tube, although prolonged NG tube use can lead to unwanted side effects like ulcers, bleeding, and they are generally uncomfortable. Gastric drainage through the use of a percutaneously placed endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube has been used in people with cancer since the 1980s. This allows relief of symptoms of malignant bowel obstruction though venting of stomach contents. Decompressive PEG tubes are routinely used in individuals with malignant obstruction, although these tubes tend to get clogged from food blocking the tube. The AspireAssist is a weight loss device that allows participants to remove a large amount of the food in their stomachs after each meal to help them to lose weight via an aspiration device attached to the abdominal portion of the tube which allows instillation of water into the stomach, followed by aspiration of the gastric contents into a receptacle or the toilet. The device is placed endoscopically in an identical fashion to a standard PEG tube. Although most commonly used for weight loss, the device is FDA cleared to be used as a venting tube as well. The purpose of this study is to determine if the AspireAssist provides an improved quality of life when compared with a standard venting gastrostomy tube for participants with malignant bowel obstructions.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 5, 2020

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 24, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Number of tube related complications per day

    Number of tube related complications per day, including tube clogging, skin infection, dislodgement, etc.

    at 30 days

  • Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey scores

    Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey, with scores ranging from 0-15 with lower scores corresponding to higher satisfaction with the tube

    At baseline

  • Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey scores

    Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey, with scores ranging from 0-15 with lower scores corresponding to higher satisfaction with the tube

    At 7 days from the date of tube placement

  • Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey scores

    Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey, with scores ranging from 0-15 with lower scores corresponding to higher satisfaction with the tube

    At 30 days from the date of tube placement

  • Quality of life as measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)

    Quality of life as measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), with scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes

    At baseline

  • Quality of life as measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)

    Quality of life as measured by ESAS, with scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes

    At 7 days from the date of tube placement

  • Quality of life as measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)

    Quality of life as measured by ESAS, with scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes

    At 30 days from the date of tube placement

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of decompressions per day

    at 30 days

  • Number of ED visits or readmissions for tube related problems

    at 30 days

  • Number of calls or office visits for nausea or tube related issues

    at 30 days

  • Ability to eat/drink assessed via GOOSS

    At baseline

  • Ability to eat/drink assessed via GOOSS

    At 1 week from the date of tube placement

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

AspireAssist

EXPERIMENTAL

Gastrostomy tubes will be placed 1-2 days after enrollment. Questionnaires will be completed at 7 and 30 days, and the AspireAssist group will have a clinic visit at 7 days to have the skin-port placed. All participants will be placed on a diet consisting of liquids and soft foods to prevent clogging of the gastrostomy tube

Device: AspireAssist deviceOther: gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) questionnaireOther: Modified Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) questionnaireOther: Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey

Standard PEG

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Gastrostomy tubes will be placed 1-2 days after enrollment. Questionnaires will be completed at 7 and 30 days All participants will be placed on a diet consisting of liquids and soft foods to prevent clogging of the gastrostomy tube

Device: Standard decompressive PEG tubeOther: gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) questionnaireOther: Modified Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) questionnaireOther: Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey

Interventions

Allows for aspiration of gastric contents into a receptacle or the toilet to prevent symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and to prevent aspiration. Device is placed endoscopically in an identical fashion to a standard PEG tube G 1-2 days after enrollment

AspireAssist

Allows for gastric drainage to prevent symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and to prevent aspiration. Device is placed endoscopically 1-2 days after enrollment

Standard PEG

Gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) questionnaire Both groups will receive the questionnaires via a phone call

AspireAssistStandard PEG

Modified Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) questionnaire Both groups will receive the questionnaires via a phone call

AspireAssistStandard PEG

Patient satisfaction and ease of use survey Both groups will receive the questionnaires via a phone call

AspireAssistStandard PEG

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Malignant (cancer of any type) gastric or small bowel obstruction referred to surgery for placement of a venting gastrostomy tube for gastric decompression
  • Able to demonstrate the ability to use the AspireAssist prior to placement

You may not qualify if:

  • Those who are immobile and unable to at least sit up in bed to vent the gastrostomy tube.
  • Undergoing placement of a gastrostomy tube for any other indication other than malignant small bowel or gastric outlet obstruction.
  • Absolute contraindications to gastrostomy tube placement, such as occluding oral or esophageal tumors

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnairesgoblet cell silencer inhibitor

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Alisan Fathalizadeh, MD

    Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2020

First Posted

May 5, 2020

Study Start

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion

July 1, 2023

Study Completion

August 1, 2023

Last Updated

January 31, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This is a feasibility study of 40 participants and IPD will not be shared

Locations