Resting Full-cycle Flow Ratio (RFR) Versus Angiography to Guide Revascularization Strategy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG)
RFR-CABG
1 other identifier
interventional
500
3 countries
4
Brief Summary
Different trials have shown that fractional flow reserve (FFR) could successfully guide revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is conceivable that a similar revascularization guidance could be useful also for surgical revascularization i.e. coronary by-pass graft (CABG). Experience learns that grafts placed on vessels with hemodynamically non-significant stenosis often occlude due to competitive antegrade flow. Resting full-cycle Flow Ratio (RFR) is a measurement performed to evaluate the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenosis. Differently from FFR which is a measurement performed in maximal hyperemia, the RFR is a measurement that is performed in rest and therefore may predict better than FFR the baseline equilibriums that could lead to graft failure, while it has similar capacity to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis as FFR. It is unknown whether RFR guided CABG revascularization is superior as compared to angiography alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Feb 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
ExpectedFebruary 1, 2024
January 1, 2024
4.7 years
May 1, 2020
January 31, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants who deceased, had a Myocardial Infarction (MI), Clinically-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR), Stroke or Graft Dysfunction at 3 months post CABG
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Cut-off value for the RFR that best predicts graft occlusion
Baseline
Number of participants with graft dysfunction at 3 months post CABG
3 months
Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of Death, MI, CD-TVR and Stroke at 1 year
1 year
Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of Death, MI, CD-TVR and Stroke at 3 years
3 years
CD-TVR at 3 months post CABG
1 year
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
angiography guided CABG
ACTIVE COMPARATORangiography guided CABG
RFR guided CABG
EXPERIMENTALRFR guided CABG
Interventions
All patients will undergo RFR and FFR measurement before CABG. RFR and FFR values will be blinded to the patients. In the experimental arm the decision to revascularize will be based on RFR.
All patients will undergo RFR and FFR measurement before CABG. RFR and FFR values will be blinded to the patients. In the control arm the RFR values will be blinded to the cardiothoracic surgeon.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients between 18 or older undergoing CABG
- Patients willing and capable to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous CABG
- Concomitant severe valvular disease intervention
- Remaining (expected) coronary stenosis of \> 50% diameter stenosis distally to graft anastomosis
- Left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%
- Known transmural myocardial infarction
- Documented microvascular disease
- RFR/FFR measurement judged impossible
- Life expectancy \<2 years
- Participation in other investigational clinical trials
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Diagram B.V.lead
Study Sites (4)
Imelda ziekenhuis
Bonheiden, Belgium
AZ Sint-Jan Brugge
Bruges, Belgium
Medical University of Silesia
Katowice, Poland
SUSCCH
Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- All patients will undergo RFR and FFR measurement before CABG. RFR and FFR values will be blinded to the patients in both arms. In the control arm (angiography guided CABG) the RFR values will be blinded to the cardiothoracic surgeon.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2020
First Posted
May 5, 2020
Study Start
February 3, 2020
Primary Completion
October 31, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
February 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01