Study Stopped
The blistering device used for harvesting the third arm was discontinued by the manufacturer.
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation Procedure in the Treatment of Vitiligo
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Vitiligo is a dermatologic disease characterized by depigmentation of the skin. While the loss of melanocytes observed in vitiligo is driven by the immune system, repigmentation of the skin that occurs during UV light treatment is driven by melanocytes that migrate out of the hair follicle and into the epidermis or the activation of stem cells within the epidermis. Unfortunately, some skin areas affected by vitiligo have very few hair follicle melanocytes and an indeterminate number of epidermal melanocytes and therefore unable to respond to light therapy. This pilot study seeks to examine the relative efficacy of different harvesting methods for the melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure (MKTP) in the treatment of vitiligo. In addition, this study will analyze the tissue of excess tissue harvested during the procedure to identify distinct cellular and molecular features of chronic vitiligo. Patients in Dr. Ganesan's clinic at the UCI (University of California, Irvine) Department of Dermatology will be approached for participation in the study. The study will include both men and women and will not be limited by race or ethnicity. The investigators will exclude individuals less than 18 years old for the study as the investigators believe it would be difficult for these subjects to tolerate the melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure. Participants will be offered a melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure with one of the three different tissue harvesting methods (a blade, suction blister) and the method without dissociation (Cellutome). This study has three arms:
- 1.MKTP with Surgical Blade
- 2.MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument (suction blistering device).
- 3.Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation utilizing Cellutome (a device used for treating chronic burn wounds)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 5, 2024
CompletedSeptember 5, 2024
August 1, 2024
4.2 years
April 20, 2020
November 29, 2023
August 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Patients Who Had a Percent Change in Body Surface Area in Response Rate to Treatment
Number of patients who had a percent change in body surface area in response rate to treatment as assessed by photography.
6 months
Change in VASI
Percent change in the transplanted areas as evaluated by VASI (Vitiligo Area Scoring Index). The negative scores mean improvement and positive scores means worsening.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Percent of Patients That Healed in One Week
6 months
Percentage of Patients That Experience Complications
6 months
Study Arms (3)
MKTP with Surgical Blade
EXPERIMENTALThe investigator harvested skin from the donor site and skin from the recipient site using a surgical blade in the first arm of the study.
MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument
EXPERIMENTALBlister grafting technique with dissociation of the cells was performed in the second arm of the study.
Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, transplanting the blisters without dissociation of the cells will be conducted.
Interventions
In this procedure, the donor skin will be harvested with a surgical blade and the donor skin will be dissociated
In this procedure, the investigator uses a negative pressure instrument to create a few blisters on the donor skin and use the blisters for grafting after cell dissociation.
In this procedure, an automated suction blister device will be used to create micro domes and these micro domes will be used directly for grafting without dissociation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Verified diagnosis of vitiligo by a board-certified dermatologist
- Candidate for vitiligo treatment as determined by lead researcher
- Has a 5 cm2 area of vitiligo and an area on the upper thigh that is not affected by the disease
- Over 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Ability to understand, abide by and participate in study procedures
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to understand or abide by instructions for participation in study and procedure
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Less than 18 years old at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Current use of tobacco products or within 1 month prior to procedure date
- History of coagulation disorder, platelet dysfunction disorder, platelet count less than \<150,000 platelets per microliter
- History of poor wound healing or condition that would compromise optimal healing of graft site as deemed by lead researcher
- History of keloids
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697, United States
Related Publications (2)
Shiu J, Zhang L, Lentsch G, Flesher JL, Jin S, Polleys C, Jo SJ, Mizzoni C, Mobasher P, Kwan J, Rius-Diaz F, Tromberg BJ, Georgakoudi I, Nie Q, Balu M, Ganesan AK. Multimodal analyses of vitiligo skin identify tissue characteristics of stable disease. JCI Insight. 2022 Jul 8;7(13):e154585. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.154585.
PMID: 35653192RESULTMobasher P, Shiu J, Lentsch G, Ganesan AK. Comparing the Efficacy of 2 Different Harvesting Techniques for Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation in Vitiligo. Dermatol Surg. 2021 May 1;47(5):732-733. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002922. No abstract available.
PMID: 33905400RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anand Ganesan, MD, Professor
- Organization
- University of California, Irvine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anand K Ganesan, MD, PhD
University of California, Irvine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The patients were not randomly assigned, rather each arm has been done sequentially with a retrospective comparison of the results.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2020
First Posted
May 5, 2020
Study Start
September 29, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
September 5, 2024
Results First Posted
September 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share