Virtual Teach-to-Goal Education vs. Brief Education for Children
V-TTG vs BI
A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Virtual Teach-to-Goal Education vs. Brief Intervention for Children
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two different ways to teach hospitalized children how to use a metered dose inhaler and to follow-up after discharge home from the hospital to determine durability of the education.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable asthma
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedApril 29, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.1 years
November 9, 2018
April 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of participants with metered dose inhaler (MDI) misuse immediately after V-TTG vs. BI education
Evaluate effectiveness of V-TTG as compared to BI as measured by inhaler technique post-intervention. This will provide data on the short-term effectiveness of the interventions. Each patient's inhaler technique will be assessed using validated inhaler checklists by the trained assessor.
Initial study visit / baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Acceptability of V-TTG among children and parents based on Likert-scale questions (1-5)
Initial study visit - after completing V-TTG intervention
Usability of V-TTG among children and parents based on open-ended questions
Initial study visit - after completing V-TTG intervention
Proportion of participants with metered dose inhaler (MDI) misuse in VTTG vs BI arms at 1 month after education
Follow-up visit at 1 month
Self-efficacy: Questionnaire
Initial study visit - at baseline and immediately after intervention
Study Arms (2)
Virtual Teach-to-Goal (V-TTG)
EXPERIMENTALThe RA will show the patient how to use the tablet to access the education module and be available for questions about the technology / tablet but not about the content. Within the module, the child will: * answer questions about how to use the inhaler as part of a pre-video assessment. * watch a video about how to correctly use a Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) and spacer. * answer questions on the tablet to assess how well they understand how to use the inhaler. If a child answers any questions incorrectly, they will watch the video again and have another chance to answer the incorrect questions. The child will receive instruction by video one or multiple times (up to 3 times), depending on how much they understand after each round of instruction, as demonstrated by their responses to questions.
Brief Intervention (BI)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe RA will give the patient a handout about inhaler technique and read the steps to the child.
Interventions
Virtual Teach-to-Goal is an educational module that teaches children how to use their inhaler properly; this is done with an IPAD. In the module, the child will complete a series of questions as a pre-assessment, watch a video about how to use the inhaler properly, and then answer a series of questions as a post-assessment. If a child answers any questions incorrectly, they will watch the video again and have another chance to answer the incorrect questions. The child will receive instruction by video one or multiple times (up to 3 times), depending on how much they understand after each round of instruction, as demonstrated by their responses to questions.
There is a handout that describes proper inhaler technique. The RA reads the handout to the child.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The child is between the ages of 5-10 years old
- The child is admitted for an asthma exacerbation, wheezing, or bronchospasm
- The child is admitted to the Pediatric Hospital Medicine Service at Comer Children's Hospital
- The child is prescribed albuterol
You may not qualify if:
- The child/parent decline or unable to provide consent/assent, do not speak/read English
- The child cannot use an inhaler by themselves without a mask
- The child previously participated in this study
- The child is currently in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Chicagolead
- American College of Chest Physicianscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Chicago Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Related Publications (1)
Volerman A, Balachandran U, Zhu M, Akel M, Hull A, Siros M, Luna V, Xu I, Press VG. Evaluating inhaler education interventions for hospitalized children with asthma: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Aug;131(2):217-223.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.02.023. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
PMID: 36870528DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 9, 2018
First Posted
May 4, 2020
Study Start
January 16, 2019
Primary Completion
February 27, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
April 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share