Effect of Manual Therapy on Tibiotarsal Joint Mobility in Diabetic Individuals
Acute Effect of Manual Therapy on Tibiotarsal Joint Mobility of Lower Limbs in Diabetic Individuals
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study aimed to evaluate the acute effect of manual therapy on ankle joint mobility in diabetic patients. Forty volunteers, with a mean age of 59.35±7.85, with type 2 DM and neurological symptoms of Diabetic Distal Polyneuropathy according to a Diabetic Polyneuropathy Diagnostic Scale (EDPNDD) protocol with the amplitude were performed. Were divided into two groups: Sham group (GS), and intervention group (GI), which underwent manual manipulation intervention and seven-day follow-up. Joint range of motion analysis was performed using digital goniometry and static discharge of weights assessed by computerized baropodometry with open and closed eyes, and the Shapiro-Wilk normality test evaluated data distribution and relative, Tukey post hoc set ANOVA tests were used for non-normal variables. The Kruskal- Wallis test followed by Dunn\'s post-hoc test. SAS statistical software was used and the significance level of 5%. Results: The results showed an increased joint range of motion, plantar flexion, and dorsiflexion, between the moments and moments after manipulation and follow-up. It was still possible to make a significant difference between GI when it was with GS at poster and follow-up. No intragroup analysis was performed by GS, for analysis over time. Regarding intragroup comparisons over time (pre, post-intervention, and follow-up), a significant difference was made for Front and back displacement amplitude (PAD) with open eyes of the GI, with an increase after intervention and reduction without follow up. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, the work performed with manual therapy increased the ankle joint amplitude in diabetic individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2020
CompletedMay 4, 2020
April 1, 2020
1 month
April 29, 2020
April 29, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Tibiotarsal joint range of motion
degrees
2 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Static balance
6 minute
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALIntervention group, assessed on day 1, then underwent manual manipulation intervention and were reevaluated post-intervention and again evaluated on the 7th post-treatment day and received preventive guidance at the end of the experiment (follow-up).
Sham Group
SHAM COMPARATORSham group, evaluated on day 1 and day 7, and received preventive diabetes guidance at the end of the experiment (follow-up).
Interventions
The thrust manipulation technique was used, which consists of high speed and small amplitude manipulation. The therapeutic intervention was performed through decompressive maneuvers for the tibiotarsal joints. The choice of the place of application of the manipulation technique was delimited by the identification of the area or areas with compressive compartmental impairment and joint restriction. The use of the method depended directly on the identification of one or more regions of joint restraint.
Evaluation and care guidelines on glycemic control and diabetic foot care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of both sexes aged between 35 and 70 years, and with more than 5 years of Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with skin lesions or lower limb fractures in the last six months, plantar malformations, severe postural changes and real difference in the length of the lower limbs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Medical School of Ribeirão Preto
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
University of São Paulo
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
Marron-Gomez D, Rodriguez-Fernandez AL, Martin-Urrialde JA. The effect of two mobilization techniques on dorsiflexion in people with chronic ankle instability. Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Feb;16(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
PMID: 24679362RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Elaine CO Guirro, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2020
First Posted
May 4, 2020
Study Start
August 9, 2017
Primary Completion
September 20, 2017
Study Completion
December 14, 2017
Last Updated
May 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
after the end of Research