NCT04372810

Brief Summary

The study aimed to evaluate the acute effect of manual therapy on ankle joint mobility in diabetic patients. Forty volunteers, with a mean age of 59.35±7.85, with type 2 DM and neurological symptoms of Diabetic Distal Polyneuropathy according to a Diabetic Polyneuropathy Diagnostic Scale (EDPNDD) protocol with the amplitude were performed. Were divided into two groups: Sham group (GS), and intervention group (GI), which underwent manual manipulation intervention and seven-day follow-up. Joint range of motion analysis was performed using digital goniometry and static discharge of weights assessed by computerized baropodometry with open and closed eyes, and the Shapiro-Wilk normality test evaluated data distribution and relative, Tukey post hoc set ANOVA tests were used for non-normal variables. The Kruskal- Wallis test followed by Dunn\'s post-hoc test. SAS statistical software was used and the significance level of 5%. Results: The results showed an increased joint range of motion, plantar flexion, and dorsiflexion, between the moments and moments after manipulation and follow-up. It was still possible to make a significant difference between GI when it was with GS at poster and follow-up. No intragroup analysis was performed by GS, for analysis over time. Regarding intragroup comparisons over time (pre, post-intervention, and follow-up), a significant difference was made for Front and back displacement amplitude (PAD) with open eyes of the GI, with an increase after intervention and reduction without follow up. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, the work performed with manual therapy increased the ankle joint amplitude in diabetic individuals.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 9, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 20, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 14, 2017

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 4, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 4, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

April 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

PhysiotherapyDiabetes MelittusManual TherapyAnkle Joint

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tibiotarsal joint range of motion

    degrees

    2 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Static balance

    6 minute

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention group, assessed on day 1, then underwent manual manipulation intervention and were reevaluated post-intervention and again evaluated on the 7th post-treatment day and received preventive guidance at the end of the experiment (follow-up).

Procedure: High Velocity Low Amplitude manipulation (HVLA)Procedure: Care assessment and guidance

Sham Group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham group, evaluated on day 1 and day 7, and received preventive diabetes guidance at the end of the experiment (follow-up).

Procedure: Care assessment and guidance

Interventions

The thrust manipulation technique was used, which consists of high speed and small amplitude manipulation. The therapeutic intervention was performed through decompressive maneuvers for the tibiotarsal joints. The choice of the place of application of the manipulation technique was delimited by the identification of the area or areas with compressive compartmental impairment and joint restriction. The use of the method depended directly on the identification of one or more regions of joint restraint.

Intervention Group

Evaluation and care guidelines on glycemic control and diabetic foot care.

Intervention GroupSham Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients of both sexes aged between 35 and 70 years, and with more than 5 years of Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with skin lesions or lower limb fractures in the last six months, plantar malformations, severe postural changes and real difference in the length of the lower limbs.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Medical School of Ribeirão Preto

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil

Location

University of São Paulo

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Marron-Gomez D, Rodriguez-Fernandez AL, Martin-Urrialde JA. The effect of two mobilization techniques on dorsiflexion in people with chronic ankle instability. Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Feb;16(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Complications

Interventions

Counseling

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesCommunity Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Elaine CO Guirro, PhD

    University of Sao Paulo

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The volunteers were randomized by means of sealed matte envelopes in the following groups: sham group (GS), evaluated on day 1 and day 7, and received preventive diabetes guidance at the end of the experiment (follow-up) and intervention group (GI), assessed on day 1, then underwent manual manipulation intervention and were reevaluated post-intervention. They were again evaluated on the 7th post-treatment day and received preventive guidance at the end of the experiment (follow-up).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2020

First Posted

May 4, 2020

Study Start

August 9, 2017

Primary Completion

September 20, 2017

Study Completion

December 14, 2017

Last Updated

May 4, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

after the end of Research

Locations