NCT04372212

Brief Summary

Failure of closure of the processus vaginalis during intrauterine life will result in congenital inguinal hernia \[CIH\]. Exact incidence of CIH in children is not known but it has been reported between 1-5 %. In premature babies, the incidence may reach up to 15-30%. Congenital inguinal hernia is more common in boys than girls, ranging from 4:1 to 10:1 \[1\]. Although the open inguinal herniotomy and high ligation of the sac is the gold standard line of the treatment, Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair become a good option. The laparoscopy has many advantages that it is simple, feasible, and safe with detection of the contralateral hernia and other hernias. In addition to laparoscopy results in excellent cosmetic results low wound infection, less pain, and short hospital stay. The non-division of the hernia sac in during laparoscopic hernia repair may be the cause of recurrence and postoperative hydrocele \[5\]. Division of hernia sac and suturing of proximal part at IIR; is modification of the laparoscopic technique which mimic what happen during open herniotomy. Some authors resected the processus vaginalis and closed the inguinal ring for the repair of CIH. They claimed that they have excellent results with low recurrence.One author described a technique based on the theory that CIH is due to a patent processus vaginalis, and therefore, the procedure should be to entirely resect it, with or without closure of the internal ring. This allows the peritoneal scar tissue to close the area of the ring. Also, this scarring occurs in the extent of the inguinal canal where the dissection took place, therefore causing the same peritoneal scarring and sealing of the inguinal floor with complete resolution of the problem. However, a few studies address the superiority of technique over the other and to date there is no controlled randomized study to compare needlescopic disconnection of the hernia sac and closure of the peritoneum at IIR versus disconnection without closure of the peritoneum.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 21, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2020

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

April 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Recurrence of hernia [time frame]

    All the patient will be examined during the period of the follow up to check the recurrence of hernia by clinical examination and inguino-scrotal U/S

    at 1,2,3,6,10 and at12 moth

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • cosmetic

    At 3,6,12 month

  • Operative time

    At the first day of operation in minutes

Study Arms (2)

Inversion and Snaring

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision \[Point A\] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min. Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.

Device: Hernia sac inversion and Snaring

Inversion and Ligation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision \[Point A\] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min. Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.

Device: Hernia sac inversion and Snaring

Interventions

Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision \[Point A\] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min. Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.

Inversion and LigationInversion and Snaring

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 12 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailsthe technique is not suitable in boys as there are vas and vessels passing near the internal inguinal ring and are vulnerable to injury So. it is not practical in boys
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Female patients with congenital inguinal hernia (unilateral or bilateral) Hernia defect less than 1.5 cm. Age: from 6 months to 10 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • Male patients Female patients with recurrent inguinal hernia Females below 6-Month Hernia defect more than 1.5 cm.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine

Cairo, Egypt

RECRUITING

Faculty of Medicine

Tanta, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Shalaby RY, Fawy M, Soliman SM, Dorgham A. A new simplified technique for needlescopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Apr;41(4):863-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.042.

  • Wantz GE. Testicular atrophy as a risk inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Apr;154(4):570-1.

  • Niyogi A, Tahim AS, Sherwood WJ, De Caluwe D, Madden NP, Abel RM, Haddad MJ, Clarke SA. A comparative study examining open inguinal herniotomy with and without hernioscopy to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a pediatric population. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Apr;26(4):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2549-x. Epub 2010 Feb 9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HerniaWounds and Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Rafik Y Shalaby, MD

    Al-Azhar University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Rafik Y Shalaby, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Pediatric Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2020

First Posted

May 1, 2020

Study Start

March 21, 2020

Primary Completion

March 1, 2021

Study Completion

July 1, 2021

Last Updated

May 7, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Yes: There is a plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
will provide the data at the end of the study
Access Criteria
The data will be uploaded on google drive in the following link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1q7R23Bhv4ACKm70hQqffIHV1fvBmlXFt
More information

Locations