Needlescopic Inversion and Snaring Versus Ligation of Hernia Sac in Girls
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Failure of closure of the processus vaginalis during intrauterine life will result in congenital inguinal hernia \[CIH\]. Exact incidence of CIH in children is not known but it has been reported between 1-5 %. In premature babies, the incidence may reach up to 15-30%. Congenital inguinal hernia is more common in boys than girls, ranging from 4:1 to 10:1 \[1\]. Although the open inguinal herniotomy and high ligation of the sac is the gold standard line of the treatment, Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair become a good option. The laparoscopy has many advantages that it is simple, feasible, and safe with detection of the contralateral hernia and other hernias. In addition to laparoscopy results in excellent cosmetic results low wound infection, less pain, and short hospital stay. The non-division of the hernia sac in during laparoscopic hernia repair may be the cause of recurrence and postoperative hydrocele \[5\]. Division of hernia sac and suturing of proximal part at IIR; is modification of the laparoscopic technique which mimic what happen during open herniotomy. Some authors resected the processus vaginalis and closed the inguinal ring for the repair of CIH. They claimed that they have excellent results with low recurrence.One author described a technique based on the theory that CIH is due to a patent processus vaginalis, and therefore, the procedure should be to entirely resect it, with or without closure of the internal ring. This allows the peritoneal scar tissue to close the area of the ring. Also, this scarring occurs in the extent of the inguinal canal where the dissection took place, therefore causing the same peritoneal scarring and sealing of the inguinal floor with complete resolution of the problem. However, a few studies address the superiority of technique over the other and to date there is no controlled randomized study to compare needlescopic disconnection of the hernia sac and closure of the peritoneum at IIR versus disconnection without closure of the peritoneum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2021
CompletedMay 7, 2020
May 1, 2020
12 months
April 29, 2020
May 5, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence of hernia [time frame]
All the patient will be examined during the period of the follow up to check the recurrence of hernia by clinical examination and inguino-scrotal U/S
at 1,2,3,6,10 and at12 moth
Secondary Outcomes (2)
cosmetic
At 3,6,12 month
Operative time
At the first day of operation in minutes
Study Arms (2)
Inversion and Snaring
ACTIVE COMPARATORVertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision \[Point A\] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min. Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.
Inversion and Ligation
ACTIVE COMPARATORVertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision \[Point A\] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min. Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.
Interventions
Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision \[Point A\] is made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min. Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac. Then, modified polypectomy snare (SN) was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen. SGD-C passed inside the loop of SN and re-catches the hernial sac, which was then twisted around its neck several times. SN was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current was applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) is then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients with congenital inguinal hernia (unilateral or bilateral) Hernia defect less than 1.5 cm. Age: from 6 months to 10 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Male patients Female patients with recurrent inguinal hernia Females below 6-Month Hernia defect more than 1.5 cm.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, Egypt
Faculty of Medicine
Tanta, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Shalaby RY, Fawy M, Soliman SM, Dorgham A. A new simplified technique for needlescopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Apr;41(4):863-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.042.
PMID: 16567212RESULTWantz GE. Testicular atrophy as a risk inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Apr;154(4):570-1.
PMID: 7064092RESULTNiyogi A, Tahim AS, Sherwood WJ, De Caluwe D, Madden NP, Abel RM, Haddad MJ, Clarke SA. A comparative study examining open inguinal herniotomy with and without hernioscopy to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a pediatric population. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Apr;26(4):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2549-x. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
PMID: 20143077RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rafik Y Shalaby, MD
Al-Azhar University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Pediatric Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2020
First Posted
May 1, 2020
Study Start
March 21, 2020
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Last Updated
May 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- will provide the data at the end of the study
- Access Criteria
- The data will be uploaded on google drive in the following link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1q7R23Bhv4ACKm70hQqffIHV1fvBmlXFt
Yes: There is a plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available