The Short-term Effects of Instrument-Based Mobilization Compared With Manual Mobilization for Low Back Pain: A Randomized ClinicalTrial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of instrument-based mobilization compared with manual mobilization in patients with non-specific low back pain (NLBP), in terms of spinal muscle activation, decrease in pain, and improvement in range of motion (ROM). Design: Randomized clinical trial, double blind. Participants and interventions: A total of 66 participants with localized NLBP will be divided into 2 groups matched for sex, age, and body mass index. The intervention group will receive central postero-anterior mobilization with a force of 150 N through physiotherapy instrument mobilization at the level of pain in the lumbar spine. The control group will receive central postero-anterior grade III mobilization through the pisiform grip method at the level of pain in the lumbar spine. Main outcome measures: Measurements will be taken before the intervention, after the 1st session, after the 6th session, and at 4 weeks follow-up. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging will be done to identify lumbar multifidus (LM) activation through the measurement of muscle thickness at the level of L5-L4 vertebrae, during rest and lower-extremity movement. Each participant will self-rate the pain intensity in the lumbar spine according to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The pressure-pain threshold (PPT) will be measured using an algometer. Lumbar ROM will be measured using a dual inclinometer method in flexion and extension. The results will be compared between the intervention and control groups through mixed analysis of variance for LM thickness, lumbar ROM, PPT, and NPRS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2021
CompletedApril 29, 2020
April 1, 2020
7 months
April 26, 2020
April 28, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Numeric pain rating scale
a series of numbers from 0 to 10, with '0' indicating no pain and '10' indicating the most intense pain possible
2-3 weeks
Lumbar Multifidus muscle activation
muscle activation quantified by measuring the muscle thickness during rest and activation positions.
2-3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pressure pain threshold
2-3 weeks
Lumbar spine ROM
2-3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
manual therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe control group will receive central postero-anterior grade III mobilization through the pisiform grip method at the level of pain in the lumbar spine.
instrumental manual therapy
EXPERIMENTALthe intervention groub rcieved central postero-anterior mobilization with a force of 20-30 N through physiotherapy instrument mobilization at the level of pain in the lumbar spine.
Interventions
central postroanterion mobilization on the most painful vertebral level at the lumbar spine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 20-59 years (commonly affected age range), BMI 18.5-30 kg/m2 (normal to overweight), localized NLBP, pain duration \<12 months, and pain score ≥3/10 on the NPRS.
You may not qualify if:
- history of spinal surgery, significant previous back trauma, spinal or lower-extremity deformities, LBP associated with peripheral neurological symptoms (paraesthesia, anaesthesia, signs of nerve root compression), neurological diseases, systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis), and any contraindication to manual therapy (spinal instability, healing fracture, dislocations, pregnancy in women).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Khobar, Eastern Province, 31911, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ms.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2020
First Posted
April 29, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2020
Study Completion
April 30, 2021
Last Updated
April 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share