Nursing Counseling on Stress and Depression for Women With Recurrent Miscarriage
Effectiveness of Nursing Counseling on Stress and Depression for Women With Recurrent Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
62
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Recurrent miscarriage is a frustrating event for couples. The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial was to examine the effectiveness of nursing counseling on sleep quality, depression, stress, and social support in women with recurrent miscarriage (RM). Sixty-two eligible women were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n = 31) or the control (n = 31) group. The experimental group received routine care and three sessions of nursing counseling during the 12-week prenatal genetic testing stage, while the control group received routine care only. Outcome measures included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Edinburgh Prenatal Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, and Interpersonal Support Evaluation List. Paired sample t-tests were conducted before and after nursing counseling to measure whether there were any statistically significant changes in outcome variables.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2020
CompletedApril 24, 2020
April 1, 2020
1.3 years
April 20, 2020
April 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., 1989). A PSQI global score of \> 5 was adopted to indicate poor sleep quality, which yields a diagnostic sensitivity of 98.7% and specificity of 84.4% for diagnosing sleep disturbances (Backhaus et al., 2002). The summed scores for the seven components form a global PSQI score (range = 0-21); higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.
12 weeks
Edinburgh Prenatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
The severity of depressive symptoms in our study participants during the previous week was measured using the EPDS (Cox, Holden, \& Sagovsky, 1987). The EPDS consists of 10 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (yes, most of the time). Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. EPDS can be used as a screening tool for depression in pregnant and postnatal women, and has been shown to have good reliability (Da Costa, Larouche, Dritsa, \& Brender, 2000; Eberhard-Gran, Eskild, Tambs, Opjordsmoen, \& Samuelsen, 2001; Evans, Heron, Francomb, Oke, \& Golding, 2001). In Taiwan, the Chinese-language version of the EPDS has good internal consistency (Heh, 2001; Hsu \& Chen, 2008; Ko et al., 2010; Su et al., 2007), concurrent validity of 0.79 with the Beck Depression Inventory (Heh, 2001), and a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 89% (Su et al., 2007). The Cronbach's alpha value for our study using the EPDS was 0.90.
12 weeks
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
The PSS was designed to measure the degree to which a person appraises the situations in one's life as stressful. Items of the PSS were designed to express how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded respondents find their lives to be (Cohen, Kamarch, \& Mermelstein, 1983). The 10 items on the scale are rated by the subject on a 4-point scale representing the frequency with which each item occurred. The greater the stress, the higher the scores. The Chinese version of the PSS has adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.
12 weeks
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL)
Social support was examined using the ISEL Short Form (Cohen, Mermelstein, Kamarch, \& Hoberman, 1985). This scale measures four types of social support: tangible, appraisal, self-esteem, and belonging. It consists of 16 items with a 4-point scale ranging from (0) definitely false, to (3) definitely true. The higher the score, the higher the level of perceived social support is. The Chinese version of the ISEL Short Form has adequate convergent validity (r = 0.55 with the Social Support Index), internal consistency (α = 0.81), and test-retest reliability (r = 0.77) (Chen et al., 1994). Cronbach's α in the present study was 0.90.
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
nursing counseling intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe nursing counseling intervention was implemented by a maternity nursing instructor. During the 12-week prenatal genetic testing evaluation period, experimental-group participants received three nursing consultation sessions plus regular care, while their control-group peers received regular care only. The counseling intervention was designed to facilitate self-awareness, reduce self-blame, clarify doubts, listen to patient concerns, promote forward thinking, and encourage life planning.
control group
NO INTERVENTIONcontrol group participants received regular care only
Interventions
The counseling intervention was designed to facilitate self-awareness, reduce self-blame, clarify doubts, listen to patient concerns, promote forward thinking, and encourage life planning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (1) having experienced at least two consecutive miscarriages and (2) providing informed consent to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pao-Lin Kuo, MD
College of Medicine, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The 62 women who met the inclusion criteria were assigned systematically from a random starting point using a week as the unit (Yang \& Chen, 2018) to either the experimental group (n = 31) or the control group (n = 31). To avoid contaminating data by allowing participants to communicate with one another during the prenatal genetic testing evaluation, data were collected on the first week from experimental-group participants, who were selected by a research assistant who draw lots (E for experimental group and C for control group) from a sack. Subsequently, the group allotment for the following week was systematically assigned in sequence to either the control group or the experimental group.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2020
First Posted
April 24, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 31, 2018
Study Completion
January 31, 2018
Last Updated
April 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share